So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
The ones on EBAY do look different, each from the other.
I was thinking about this the other day.
If each board member who wished to participate was assigned one player to grab exemplars for from EBAY listings of PSA/DNA sigs, a pretty substantial bank of sigs could be assembled.
They could all be dumped on a site somewhere for easy look-see.
Folks Who Bite Get Bitten. Folks Who Don't Bite Get Eaten.
This came out of a blister pack my son picked up around 1993. It was packaged by Treat Corporation which supplied Walmart with repackaged stuff.
Now for my observation.
I looked at the sig real quick with a loupe to see if it was a true sig and it was.
But, I think it may be an autopen.
Reason? The dark spot at the end of the sig looks like ink had pooled - people don't usually pool ink when they sign since they "lift" their pen upon completion.
I will say - this one may be from the same supplier - tho the ebayer doesn't say that's the source. The sig is different - the odds of two people getting this particular card signed and in exactly the same place if pretty hard to fathom.
So, maybe Javy does leave a little ink when he signs?
"Reason? The dark spot at the end of the sig looks like ink had pooled - people don't usually pool ink when they sign since they "lift" their pen upon completion. What do ya think?"
//////////////////////////////////
So-called "pools" also happen when a signer "pushes-off" at the end of the stroke, rather than "lifting." It can also come from a "pull-away" of the card, if the card was palmed while it was signed; rather than lifting the pen, the signer pulls or drops the palmed card away from the pen.
Those marks are super-common in political documents, which actually are signed with an auto-pen. Many auto-pen docs are quite valuable.
Folks Who Bite Get Bitten. Folks Who Don't Bite Get Eaten.
Comments
Javy Lopez
And this one is autheticated by Upper Deck
The ones on EBAY do look different, each from the other.
I was thinking about this the other day.
If each board member who wished to participate was
assigned one player to grab exemplars for from EBAY
listings of PSA/DNA sigs, a pretty substantial bank of
sigs could be assembled.
They could all be dumped on a site somewhere for easy
look-see.
<< <i>who would fake his sig? >>
Very good question Drew.
This came out of a blister pack my son picked up around 1993. It was packaged by Treat Corporation which supplied Walmart with repackaged stuff.
Now for my observation.
I looked at the sig real quick with a loupe to see if it was a true sig and it was.
But, I think it may be an autopen.
Reason? The dark spot at the end of the sig looks like ink had pooled - people don't usually pool ink when they sign since they "lift" their pen upon completion.
What do ya think?
mike
I will say - this one may be from the same supplier - tho the ebayer doesn't say that's the source. The sig is different - the odds of two people getting this particular card signed and in exactly the same place if pretty hard to fathom.
So, maybe Javy does leave a little ink when he signs?
Thanx for the link basestealer and stown.
mike
- people don't usually pool ink when they sign since they "lift" their pen
upon completion. What do ya think?"
//////////////////////////////////
So-called "pools" also happen when a signer "pushes-off" at the end of the
stroke, rather than "lifting." It can also come from a "pull-away" of the card,
if the card was palmed while it was signed; rather than lifting the pen, the
signer pulls or drops the palmed card away from the pen.
Those marks are super-common in political documents, which actually are
signed with an auto-pen. Many auto-pen docs are quite valuable.