Options
Should this coin be considered a pattern?
Flying Eagle cents were struck for circulation in a composition of 88% copper, 12% nickel.
A large number of experimental compositions were tested for cents between 1850 and 1857.
The coin below is 88.2% copper, 10.5% nickel, 0.8% zinc and 0.4% Iron. Despite being so close to the adopted copper-nickel composition, this coin looks far more like bronze.
Judd doesn't list this composition, but Judd is hardly comprehensive when things like this are concerned.
Is something like this worthy of inclusion in the Judd book? Is it a legitimate pattern or an inconsequential aberration?

A large number of experimental compositions were tested for cents between 1850 and 1857.
The coin below is 88.2% copper, 10.5% nickel, 0.8% zinc and 0.4% Iron. Despite being so close to the adopted copper-nickel composition, this coin looks far more like bronze.
Judd doesn't list this composition, but Judd is hardly comprehensive when things like this are concerned.
Is something like this worthy of inclusion in the Judd book? Is it a legitimate pattern or an inconsequential aberration?

Andy Lustig
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
0
Comments
Specializing in 1854 and 1855 large FE patterns
<
Split the difference and call it an inconsequential pattern.
Rick -- when are you going to publish the results of your study?
<< <i>-- "Is it a legitimate pattern or an inconsequential aberration?" --
Split the difference and call it an inconsequential pattern.
Rick -- when are you going to publish the results of your study? >>
I'm sending off another 30 or so in a few weeks, so, at the VERY soonest, I'll release some info in a few months.
Specializing in 1854 and 1855 large FE patterns
<
I'm about as far from an authority as one can be, but I guess that doesn't prevent me from tossing out an opinion
Proud recipient of two "You Suck" awards
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Wow look at those die polish lines or are they hair lines on the reverse?
The stated percentages are way to close to this coins actual results.
IMHO, there is no way that this coin is a pattern or a trial.
I firmly believe in numismatics as the world's greatest hobby, but recognize that this is a luxury and without collectors, we can all spend/melt our collections/inventories.
eBaystore
Also, how do you know that the Zinc and Iron didn't show up on the surface, after the coin was minted? The presence of Zinc and Iron might indicate that some coin doctor once tried to tone the coin or clean the coin, possibly with electrolysis. That process could explain the coin's bronze-like appearance, also. I don't think that such a tiny percentage of Zinc or Iron would cause the coin's appearance to look significantly different after 150 years.
I just don't think it's a pattern. Sorry, but I think that coin might have been doctored.
I'd like to hear a chemist's opinion. For all I know, Zinc and Iron may have an immediate effect on the alloy's color. Perhaps they were added to this coin for that purpose. Remember, it was not that much later that a decision was made to bring back the copper color for the cent. Perhaps this was an early experiment to show how nickel could still be used in the cent without sacrificing the traditional red/brown color scheme...
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
They're die polish lines.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.