Can someone help me w/ 1 of my balls, please?


I know what you were thinking

But seriously...
After attending the show, I got a little nostalgic so I went through some of my old boxes. This guy was hiding in the back corner of one (probably saw light for the first time in 15 years):






For some background, we were friends of the Fogelman family, who was part Owner of the Royals back in the 80s. We went to Game 1 & 2 in KC, both losses, and I believe that's when I got this ball. However, we also went to 1 game in '84 against DET, so the ball could have been from then.
I can make out Brett, Perry, Howser, Quisenberry, Amos, Wilson, Blue, Saberhagen (I think), and Washington.
If there's anyone out there that can help me date this ball, it would be greatly appreciated.
PS - This ball is not for sale or trade

So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
0
Comments
vida blue
ul washington
pat sheridan
gaylord perry
amos otis
don hood
paul splitorff
cesar geronimo
willie wilson
frank white (from my home town!)
bud buddy black
greg pryor
clint hurdle
eyes tired!
julen
RIP GURU
Second panel: Vida Blue, Joe Simpson, Leon Roberts, Hal McRae, Frank White, Bud(dy) Black, Steve Renko
Third panel: Greg Pryor, Jim Schaeffer, John Wathan, Gaylord Perry, Larry Gura, Paul Splittorff, Cesar Geronimo, Willie Wilson
Fourth Panel: Rocky Colavito, Willie (Mays) Aikens, UL Washington, Dan Quisenberry, Cloyd Boyer, Pat Sheridan, Mark Huisman, Joe Nossek
I think I got them all except the one under Brett...sorry I don't see Saberhagen. For what it's worth they all look fine to me and looks to be 1983 or 1982.
Anyone wanna play catch with a worthless 25-year old ball?
Thanks for the insight
Forget blocking him; find out where he lives and go punch him in the nuts. --WalterSobchak 9/12/12
Looking for Al Hrabosky and any OPC Dave Campbells (the ESPN guy)
mike
Red
Looking for 81-84 Topps Stickers in PSA 9 or better, 81 Topps Scratch offs, 83 Topps Fold outs in PSA 8 or better, 83 Fleer Stamps and 81/86 Fleer Star Stickers in PSA 9 or better.
>
61 Topps (100%) 7.96
62 Parkhurst (100%) 8.70
63 Topps (100%) 7.96
63 York WB's (50%) 8.52
68 Topps (39%) 8.54
69 Topps (3%) 9.00
69 OPC (83%) 8.21
71 Topps (100%) 9.21 #1 A.T.F.
72 Topps (100%) 9.39
73 Topps (13%) 9.35
74 OPC WHA (95%) 8.57
75 Topps (50%) 9.23
77 OPC WHA (86%) 8.62 #1 A.T.F.
88 Topps (5%) 10.00
Shane
While of course I was hoping it would be a '85 ball, I'm still happy about it. I mean, how many can say they have a 82 or 83 KC team autographed ball
Seriously, thanks to everyone of you for the help
<< <i>Oh I was just joking, hence the
While of course I was hoping it would be a '85 ball, I'm still happy about it. I mean, how many can say they have a 82 or 83 KC team autographed ball
Seriously, thanks to everyone of you for the help
I mentioned this before.
I remember 1985 well since I just got stationed in St. Louis just before the WS started. The I-70 series was incredible!
Stown - I think owning an 82-83 team ball - that's is definitely genuine - is off the chart!
The ball is in super fine shape also!
thanx for sharing it
mike
Vida Blue....why does it look like his name is signed under the Rawlings stamp?
Mark
Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
<< <i>is it the resolution on my pc...or are 1/2 those autos stamps??
Vida Blue....why does it look like his name is signed under the Rawlings stamp? >>
5stat
I'll defer to Stown on that one - good eye.
I'm not all that familiar with stamps - it doesn't look like a stamp to me.
On the Rawlings stamp thing - the ink from the stamp is denser than the pen used I believe - so it just didn't attach to the blue?
or it could be a stamp and that's why the ink didn't cover the blue?
Wow - I'm so confused.
It's the scan because in hand, the sig is on top.
I'm confused too..that's why I asked...
1/2 look real....1/2 look fascimile..they are the same shade..same thickness...almost too uniform...
Then other look authentic....
I'm lost too....
<< <i>Stone,
I'm confused too..that's why I asked...
1/2 look real....1/2 look fascimile..they are the same shade..same thickness...almost too uniform...
Then other look authentic....
I'm lost too.... >>
I'm looking at it right now and I can see how the pictures appear to be misleading. I am absolutely, positively confident each sig is legit.
In fact, would be willing to put up a PSA/DNA test if anyone would like. If it's fake, I pay. If it's not, you do.
Deal or no deal?
It's late.....I'm waiting for the Pats game...too much to sort....too much to grade..someone just stick a knife in me..I'm done!!