Home World & Ancient Coins Forum

Newps ..Three German Coins

Hamburg 1726 2 Shillings
Prussia 1861 Thaler
Empire 1901 5 Mark
image
image

Comments

  • TwoKopeikiTwoKopeiki Posts: 9,737 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nice coins, Smittys. I always liked the design of that coronation thaler, featuring King Wilhelm and Queen Augusta. image
  • UdoUdo Posts: 984 ✭✭
    image
    imageimage
  • Rickc300Rickc300 Posts: 876 ✭✭
    Nice! I see you state Empire 1901 5 mark instead of a Prussian 5 mark, I do the same and have often wondered why all the coinage reform marks are still listed under the individual states. It seems to me if the Empire came into being in 1873 all of the following should be listed as Empire coinage, not under the states. Does anyone else feel that way? Any arguments either way from anyone?
    Just wondering,
    Rick
    Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed lamb contesting that vote. Benjamin Franklin - 1779

    image
    1836 Capped Liberty
    dime. My oldest US
    detecting find so far.
    I dig almost every
    signal I get for the most
    part. Go figure...
  • PreussenPreussen Posts: 2,307 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Nice! I see you state Empire 1901 5 mark instead of a Prussian 5 mark, I do the same and have often wondered why all the coinage reform marks are still listed under the individual states. It seems to me if the Empire came into being in 1873 all of the following should be listed as Empire coinage, not under the states. Does anyone else feel that way? Any arguments either way from anyone?
    Just wondering,
    Rick >>



    image Interesting subject. I suppose it could be argued either way, but to me the coin is clearly Prussian. While Prussia was a part of the Empire, the individual German States retained the right to issue their own distinctive coinage above the 1 Mark denomination (with few exceptions, they had the common reverse design). Coins of 1 Mark denomination and below, even if minted in Berlin, are listed (correctly, IMO) under Empire coinage instead of Prussia because they were the common coinage of the Empire. - Preussen
    "Illegitimis non carborundum" -General Joseph Stilwell. See my auctions
  • 3Mark3Mark Posts: 593 ✭✭✭
    [
    image Interesting subject. I suppose it could be argued either way, but to me the coin is clearly Prussian. While Prussia was a part of the Empire, the individual German States retained the right to issue their own distinctive coinage above the 1 Mark denomination (with few exceptions, they had the common reverse design). Coins of 1 Mark denomination and below, even if minted in Berlin, are listed (correctly, IMO) under Empire coinage instead of Prussia because they were the common coinage of the Empire. - Preussen >>



    image

    And it gives me a lot of different types to collectimage3Mark
    I'm traveling on memory and running out of fuel.
Sign In or Register to comment.