Mantle PSA 9 Goes for $282,587!!
Davalillo
Posts: 1,846 ✭✭
In the Memory Lane auction that ended this week the 1952 Topps Mantle PSA 9 former owned by John Branca went for $282,587 including buyers premium--
Truly a staggering number.
Truly a staggering number.
0
Comments
1990 leaf in (10)
1986 topps mets (10)
2008 ring kings cut signatures
any Darryl Strawberry, Dwight Gooden, Keith Hernandez cards in (10)
1957 Topps 99% 7.40 GPA
Hank Aaron Basic PSA 7-8(75%)
Jim
---Not in my collection!!--
In any event I hope the buyer is happy with the purchase as that is all that matters. If he/she is happy then I am happy for them.
Steve
I find some of these auction results absolutely unbelievable, and agree with Ron- can it really be a quarter of a million dollars better than a 7? The buyers premium alone would've bought Ron's (8 years ago, of course) 4 times over.
But 280K to one person is like a few thousand to someone else. If it was me I'd rather spend that amount on a rarity, rather than a condition rarity. But to each his own, it's a really nice card no matter what the price.
Always looking for Topps Salesman Samples, pre '51 unopened packs, E90-2, E91a, N690 Kalamazoo Bats, and T204 Square Frame Ramly's
Ron,
I dont think you get a decent 7 for 12k nowdays. If my memory is correct I think fogel purchased a 10 for 300k.
But yeah 295 for a 9 is whacko just makes you wonder how many people were over 2. I think last 9 i rember seeing was 185 or so.
Matt
I thought Mr. Fogel bought his PSA 10 for $120K or so a long time ago.
bobsbbcards SGC Registry Sets
Scott
1977 Topps Star Wars - "Space Swashbucklers"
I'm still content though!
Shane
Do you remember back around 1992, there was a spot in Beckett about the sale of one of the PSA 10s for 125K$.
I believe some x-music guy picked up it - I thought that was a lot of dough.
So, if someone decides to sell their 10? What will it go for?
mike
<< <i>The Centering on this card is SUPERB! >>
Am I the only one who found this line in the listing laughable? Not that I can even comprehend spending that much on a card, but if I had that kind of dough, I think I'd hold out for a Mantle with better centering and less tilt. Centering's not usually a deal breaker for me, but I think it would be on PSA 9's, especially PSA 9's that sell for more than a quarter of a million dollars.
Probably $700,00-$800,000 with an outside shot at a million.
Incredible but in this bifurcated income world we live in there are a lot of people making ridiculous money.
Jim
Mr Mint found what...30-40 Mantles in his great 52 Topps high number find? We all like to criticize PSA for being lax or making big mistakes but they sure don't give out 9's and 10's very easily. Does anyone know if there are many raw Mantles from that find left?
It also makes some of the pre war 9's look cheap by comparison. There was a gorgeous '41 Playball DiMaggio 9 at the National being auctioned off by Mastro. The eye appeal was tremendous. I think it sold for $60-65 k...that's almost 5 Dimaggios for the price of the Mantle. Wow.
<< <i>It's interesting that there have only been a few 9's and a few 10's graded after all these years.
Mr Mint found what...30-40 Mantles in his great 52 Topps high number find? We all like to criticize PSA for being lax or making big mistakes but they sure don't give out 9's and 10's very easily. Does anyone know if there are many raw Mantles from that find left?
It also makes some of the pre war 9's look cheap by comparison. There was a gorgeous '41 Playball DiMaggio 9 at the National being auctioned off by Mastro. The eye appeal was tremendous. I think it sold for $60-65 k...that's almost 5 Dimaggios for the price of the Mantle. Wow. >>
Good question John
And it begs the issue on the question - whether or not there's still a lot of high grade stuff out there to be graded?
mike
<< <i>What proof do we actually have that 283K was a real bid by a true, live, non-ML shill? >>
Here is the bidding. It looks like the final two went head to head starting from about $180K. I don't think it makes good business sense to run up a customer on that high profile of a card for 10K (ML's share of the 60K).
Anything is possible, but I don't see it in this case.
Jim, I know that you need this card for your collection. Be patient and bid semi-aggressively on the nice ones. It is worth buying a quality card sooner than later. (IMHO)
Shane
The Mantle that went for $72,000 has already changed hands again. I tried to buy it from the new buyer or even trade for it but the new owner loves the card.
Jim
I saw that the card was flipped after he won it from Drent on the 54 board. It was definately a nice PSA 8. When you do go after the Mantle, find one that is as nice as this one. What time period do you think it will take you to get the remaining 53 cards for your set in all PSA 8's? As I look at your list, many of those that you lack are not the tough ones. I guess it is just finding them when they come available. What value do you place on your Mantle PSA 8oc?
Shane
They seem tough to me--picked up one yesterday(Podbielan). I was the underbidder on Mathews in Mastro auction.
Toughest will probaly be Pafko, Runnels, Wehmeier, Maxwell.
My Mantle has a value I think of about $20K--it is a spectacular card with a tilt cut that is probably 75/25 at its worst point.
What do you think a Pafko strong 8 would go for?
The Pafko card is an interesting card because you rarely see this one come available. I can't recall the last one that sold. I have a lead on a gentlemen who is a retired pilot which has roughly 400 cards from the 1952 set in all high grade (raw). The three Pafko cards were strong. One was a lock PSA 8/9 and the other two were for sure high end PSa 7's. I graded out five cards that I bought from him and all of them came back in a PSA 8 (he had four of these).
I will let you know the day he sells me them.
Shane
duh
Did you notice at what times of the day those bids were executed?