Thoughts on eliminating guarantees for turnaround times
Dennisl
Posts: 547
PCGS has announced 2007 pricing. Pricing remains the same but show "Black Out" dates have been eliminated as well as eliminating guarantees for turnaround times. Their justification is:
" However, we fully intend to meet the published turn-around times, as we have been doing since increasing our processing capacity. The elimination of the guarantees will eliminate customer service calls, vouchers, and other processing log jams that really don't do anything to help us service you more efficiently. '
Would like to hear other forum member's thoughts on the subject.
Thanks
Dennis
" However, we fully intend to meet the published turn-around times, as we have been doing since increasing our processing capacity. The elimination of the guarantees will eliminate customer service calls, vouchers, and other processing log jams that really don't do anything to help us service you more efficiently. '
Would like to hear other forum member's thoughts on the subject.
Thanks
Dennis
0
Comments
My last three submissions went thru like clockwork and were all ahead of schedule!
Yes, I know what the announcement says, that they'll continue to get things done as quickly as they can. And yes, I know things have been getting graded FAST of late. But I'm enough of a realist to believe it won't last forever.
My Mr. Cynic side also says the reality is that if/when submission volume goes berserk again, up to 2004-05 levels when Economy orders were taking 100+ days, the no turnaround time guarantee is going to create massive frustration and outcry from submitters.
Personally, I think they will cost themselves a bunch of business at the $50 and $100 submission levels in particular, since the quick turnaround times will no longer be guaranteed.
<< <i>I always thought it was nonproductive to guarantee something that is often beyond their control. I like the idea of not wasting time on calls and vouchers and putting the manpower into better service. >>
I agree. It seems to be working for NGC.
<< <i>SMART MOVE ON THEIR PART. If it were my business, I'd do the same thing. >>
I agree. The way the system was setup was confusing for many, and was the genesis of a lot of complaining.
Russ, NCNE