We don't need no stinkin' QX5
lsica
Posts: 1,620 ✭✭✭✭
Canon A430, Super Macro Mode
Philately will get you nowhere....
0
Comments
Wait..I thought you sneezed on that coin!
Never mind
"Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
<< <i>We don't need no stinkin' QX5 >>
.........
Santa's bringin' me one....!!!
<< <i>And what is the cost difference between the QX5 and Canon A430? >>
My question exactly. If you can get me a Canon A430 for seventy bucks, we can deal. Otherwise, I refer you to Mr Jillette:
<< <i>And what is the cost difference between the QX5 and Canon A430? >>
Canon A430 on eBay = about $125
QX5 on eBay = about $80
You can do a lot more with the Canon tho.
<< <i>
<< <i>And what is the cost difference between the QX5 and Canon A430? >>
My question exactly. If you can get me a Canon A430 for seventy bucks, we can deal. Otherwise, I refer you to Mr Jillette:
(image above) >>
Beheheh.... I think you need to add "Curmudgeon" to your list of titles, Bob.
I also agree with you and Mike (Conder), a digital camera can't beat the bang you get from the QX5 for the buck. Instead of paying several hundred for a high-end camera, I have my $140 FinePix, my $50 QX3, and another $40 in OTT lights. I may not know entirely what I'm doing with any of them yet, but for the money I'm very pleased with the results so far.
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
<< <i>You can do a lot more with the Canon tho. >>
yup
San Diego, CA
<< <i>Beheheh.... I think you need to add "Curmudgeon" to your list of titles, Bob. >>
Good call! Done and done.
That said, the Canon does seem a lot less expensive than I thought it would be. Sounds like a pretty good camera; may have to check it out sometime.