Home Sports Talk

Getting salaries under control

stevekstevek Posts: 29,359 ✭✭✭✭✭
Getting salaries under control

By Jeff Passan, Yahoo! Sports
December 4, 2006

LAKE BUENA VISTA, Fla. – Baseball's most valuable players this season raked in a combined $740,000 in salary, which is approximately what the Chicago Cubs plan to pay Alfonso Soriano every time he sneezes the next eight years.

If there seems an incongruity with Justin Morneau making $385,000 and Ryan Howard getting $355,000 while Jamie Walker signs for $4 million a year because he happens to throw his 50 or so innings with his left hand, there is. Other than World Series, there are no two sweeter words to a general manager than "under control," which is baseball-speak for bargain.

It's such a deal, in fact, that the under-control player – preferably one with less than three years of service time, though fourth- and fifth-year arbitration-eligible players qualify, too – no longer is simply a luxury. With free-agent salaries filling with helium leading up to this year's Winter Meetings and showing no signs of abating, a quality zero-to-five player is now the most desired commodity in the game.

"Forget the $20 million-a-year guy and forget prospects," one American League executive said. "Now it's guys who have established themselves who you can control for four or five years. It gives you maneuverability to do other things. Even if their talent level isn't elite, if you know they can be a starting pitcher, reliever or everyday player, it allows you to spend more in another area that you normally couldn't with a $6 million-a-year player."

Flexibility comes with cheap contracts, and even though the minimum salary was raised 16 percent in the new collective-bargaining agreement, it's still $380,000, pennies compared to the long-term deals free agents are snagging. In a player's first three years, salaries almost always stay under the million-dollar threshold unless he signs a contract extension, as David Wright and Jose Reyes did with the New York Mets. The Philadelphia Phillies likely will give Howard a raise for aesthetic purposes. Morneau, eligible for arbitration, should end up around $3.5 million.

Still less than Walker.

This season, Jered Weaver, Chien-Ming Wang, Felix Hernandez, Hanley Ramirez, Robinson Cano, Prince Fielder, Jonathan Papelbon, Ervin Santana, Brian McCann, Curtis Granderson, Huston Street, Garrett Atkins and Ryan Zimmerman – just to name a baker's dozen – should make less than $500,000.

In their first years of arbitration – the process in which a player states his worth, the team counters with a number and the parties either settle in between or let an arbitrator take one side – Miguel Cabrera, Joe Mauer, Chase Utley and J.J. Putz still will get about one-fifth of what they would on the open market, and Dontrelle Willis, a fifth-year player, should get $9 million, about half of what he would snag.

Only in a player's sixth season – one year before he becomes a free agent – does he get his true worth, as he can request a salary commensurate to his peers with similar statistics.

"Melky Cabrera is a huge example [of their value]," New York Yankees general manager Brian Cashman said. "He's an under-control, switch-hitting, 22-year-old outfielder, and look at what the marketplace is bearing for outfielders. The Phillies were having trouble moving Bobby Abreu because of his age and the money. By sheer change in market, that looks like a sensible contract, where before it was one that was tough to move. Johnny Damon, at $13 million a year, looks like a bargain.

"And when you go down to the Melky Cabreras of the world, it's gold. He can give you cost certainty going forward. What we're all trying to do is create a diverse talent foundation to stay out of the free-agent market. Whenever you go there, you're going to have to overpay. You have people competing for someone's talent. That's why you ought to rely on your amateur and international scouts to continue to feed that system."

With luxury-tax implications hanging over New York, the Cabreras, Canos and Scott Proctors allowed the Yankees to pick up Abreu's salary in a trade last year. Its desire to keep adding to them facilitated the Gary Sheffield trade to the Detroit Tigers, in which they received pitcher Humberto Sanchez, who figures to join New York's rotation in the near future.

"We all see guys like Cabrera, or like Jered Weaver, and we all want guys like him," one National League front-office man said. "And when we try to deal for guys like him, they're just not biting anymore. They want two arms and a leg."

Or two arms – preferably left-handed – and an everyday player.

"Every team asks about those players," said the front-office man. "If I don't ask about them, I'm not doing my job. And even though the answer is pretty much the same – he's not available – we'll all say, 'I've got to have a guy like that.' "

How to get an under-control player is a matter of circumstance more than anything. The Los Angeles Angels need a power hitter, and the free-agent crop is dry. Were they to dangle Weaver, who went 11-2 with a 2.56 earned-run average as a rookie last season, they could have their pick of 30-home run hitters.

The beauty of the small salary lies in the possibilities. Only a handful of teams can afford Manny Ramirez's $18 million salary, even if the Red Sox agreed to eat some of it. Even the Kansas City Royals and Florida Marlins can afford a $500,000 player.

"You're not limited to just talking to bigger clubs," said an AL talent evaluator. "When you have a player of that caliber, you can talk to all 29 teams. Doors open. You don't have to go to your owner. You don't have to negotiate with an agent. You don't have to worry about arbitration."

You just worry about the results, and every team can live with that. Salaries have spiked so dramatically this offseason that, as the front-office man put it, "we're worrying more about balancing our budgets than figuring out who can play," something that under-control players can alleviate, if not erase.

"We're all desperate for young talent that has a chance to succeed at the major-league level," Cashman said. "If you can hit on these guys, like the Oakland A's and Minnesota Twins and Atlanta Braves have done – and we're starting to show we can do that – it gets a great deal of value. We're pushing that direction, going back to our roots."

Not just because their near-$200 million payroll, full of bloated free-agent contracts, was excessive.

"It's what built our championship clubs," Cashman said. "We got away from that after the 2001 World Series, and we're getting back to it now."



Jeff Passan is Yahoo! Sports' national baseball writer. Send Jeff a question or comment for potential use in a future column or webcast.



Comments

  • They get paid way way way too much money! I play the lottery every Friday night just hoping to hit the $2 million dollar jackpot. Some of these players makes more in one swing of the bat than most people make in a year.....and it's probably a swing and a miss too!!
  • DaBigHurtDaBigHurt Posts: 1,066 ✭✭
    That's why I don't watch baseball anymore. Nothing but a bunch of overpaid thugs who drive around with guns in their car, listening to rap music and slapping their girlfriends. image
    image

    GO MARLINS! Home of the best fans in baseball!!
  • dirtmonkeydirtmonkey Posts: 3,048 ✭✭
    How to get them under control. Stop going to games & stop buying the merchandise (ie: shoes, clothes, hats, cards, etc). That's a start... I rarely go to games anymore unless I get the tickets free from friends or vendors. It's fun sometimes, but $50 for a ticket, $8 for a beer (x10 -LOL), $7 for a sandwich, $25 for a hat, $30 for a shirt, $30 for gas... I'll pass. $200+ everytime.

    Compare that to home where I spend $10 a week for my cable, $20 for a case of beer, $3 for a bag of chips... No shirt, no shower, no gas, no line for the crapper and Tivo if I gotta pinch one off, a remote control for volume... Woohoo, bout $30.
    image
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭
    Get them under control?

    Put a hard cap in place. Force owners to play on the same field. No huge signing bonuses, put a cap on those as well.

    Until this happens, salaries will continue to spiral out of control, and the fans are the ones that will suffer. People say 'baseball is awash with cash!' but forget that it's YOUR CASH it's awash with.

    Expect concessions to continue to rise to pay for these contracts. Expect parking to rise. Expect ticket prices to rise.

    Baseball is in serious, serious trouble.
  • DaBigHurt.......that sounds more like a description of the NBA. I agree, I only go to games when I get free tickets and I don't buy merchandise. I will however watch a game on TV, because I've seen all the reruns of Married With Children and CSI already and a replay of the 1997 World's Strongest Man competition just doesn't appeal to me.
  • DaBigHurtDaBigHurt Posts: 1,066 ✭✭


    << <i>DaBigHurt.......that sounds more like a description of the NBA. I agree, I only go to games when I get free tickets and I don't buy merchandise. I will however watch a game on TV, because I've seen all the reruns of Married With Children and CSI already and a replay of the 1997 World's Strongest Man competition just doesn't appeal to me. >>



    Maybe your description of the NBA, but I'm talking about MLB thx
    image

    GO MARLINS! Home of the best fans in baseball!!
  • perkdogperkdog Posts: 31,082 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This may sound ridiculas but my answer to the problem would be this, a "Base" salary for players with a step raise for each year of service with bonus incentives for performance IE: a million bucks if you bat .300 or hit 30 Hr's, score 10 td's or rush for a thousand yards maybe? Another thing to add, enough of these monetary fines for off field stupidity, why not order community service? A millionaire will laugh at a ten thousand dollar fine but will grunt about a 30 hour week consisting of some actual work?
  • stevekstevek Posts: 29,359 ✭✭✭✭✭
    <<< We're pushing that direction, going back to our roots." >>>


    I really laughed at Cashman's comment here. Yea sure - LOL - What a crock of chit! The first bigtime free agent that comes along the Yankees will break out the checkbook and pen and start writing.
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭
    The problem isn't superstars earning $100 million contracts. The problem is that so many mediocre journeymen make $3-5M a year (or more) when they are barely, if at all, above replacement level talent which is available for close to league minimum.
  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭


    << <i><<< We're pushing that direction, going back to our roots." >>>


    I really laughed at Cashman's comment here. Yea sure - LOL - What a crock of chit! The first bigtime free agent that comes along the Yankees will break out the checkbook and pen and start writing. >>



    There's a report out that the Yankees have offered Pettitte a one year deal at $15,000,000. He's an exception, since he was a product of their system, but still...
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭
    The yankees are going back to their roots? Uhm, what roots are those, exactly?
  • A-Rod will be paid more than the whole Astros team.
  • JoeBanzaiJoeBanzai Posts: 11,944 ✭✭✭✭✭
    My gosh, people have been bitshing about salaries since Babe Ruth was "overpaid". The truth of the matter is none of them are overpaid, they get what the market will bear.

    As long a moron owners are willing to spend the money, the players will get it.

    Move on!

    Joe
    2013,14 and 15 Certificate Award Winner Harmon Killebrew Master Set and Master Topps Set
  • mcadamsmcadams Posts: 2,618 ✭✭✭


    << <i>My gosh, people have been bitshing about salaries since Babe Ruth was "overpaid". The truth of the matter is none of them are overpaid, they get what the market will bear.

    As long a moron owners are willing to spend the money, the players will get it.

    Move on!

    Joe >>



    Moron owners? Right.... Don't think for a second the game would exist in the quality that it does without the oversight of ownership. If the players ran the league, it would be a complete trainwreck. Look no further than the corrupt MLBPA for proof of that. The players and the MLBPA union fought PED testing tooth and nail for years. Its the MLBPA that are the morons, not the owners.
    Successful transactions with: thedutymon, tsalems1, davidpuddy, probstein123, lodibrewfan, gododgersfan, dialj, jwgators, copperjj, larryp, hookem, boopotts, crimsontider, rogermnj, swartz1, Counselor

    Always buying Bobby Cox inserts. PM me.
  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭


    << <i>A-Rod will be paid more than the whole Astros team. >>



    Yeah but we'll have minimal, if any at all, beer and bathroom lines.

    image
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • JoeBanzaiJoeBanzai Posts: 11,944 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>My gosh, people have been bitshing about salaries since Babe Ruth was "overpaid". The truth of the matter is none of them are overpaid, they get what the market will bear.

    As long a moron owners are willing to spend the money, the players will get it.

    Move on!

    Joe >>



    Moron owners? Right.... Don't think for a second the game would exist in the quality that it does without the oversight of ownership. If the players ran the league, it would be a complete trainwreck. Look no further than the corrupt MLBPA for proof of that. The players and the MLBPA union fought PED testing tooth and nail for years. Its the MLBPA that are the morons, not the owners. >>





    The subject was SALARIES. That's what I was referring to. The only way the owners were EVER able to keep salaries down was when the reserve clause (unconstitutional) was in effect. Remember the "Bonus Baby" rule instituted by the OWNERS? There's a trainwreck for you. It didn't hold down salaries either.

    The simple fact is many owners pay marginal players WAY too much, which gives the other marginal players leverage in negotiations. That's called fairness. The superstar players always made a lot of money, they "deserve" it because they are the best of the best, and put fans in the seats.

    I grew up watching the last team to have an owner who derived ALL of his income from the baseball team (Calvin Griffith), the new breed of owners are, in my opinion, more like high end baseball card collectors who are willing to overpay for the players they "need". Funny now the Twins have the richest owners in baseball and one of the lowest payrolls, so I would exclude the Pohlad family from being called morons.

    Perhaps you are correct. Maybe the REAL morons are the fans who are willing to pay literally hundreds of dollars to attend a single professional baseball game. I can't afford to go anymore, I am probably just a bitter old man.

    Going OFF TOPIC ownership was equally to blame for the PED problem, they were loving the money and popularity during the time when McGuire and Sosa were going crazy.

    Staying off topic, if you know anything about the MLBPA's beginnings, you know the players were not all excited about the union, but the OWNERS offered such an insultingly low offer to the players they decided to go with the union.

    You sound like a union hater, well they were directly created by business owners who were the $cum of the earth, working people, including children, and denying them basic human rights.

    Have a nice day

    Joe, the bitter old man.
    2013,14 and 15 Certificate Award Winner Harmon Killebrew Master Set and Master Topps Set
Sign In or Register to comment.