Two 1965 MS67FB's Roosies sold on eBay in the last 30 days.
Stooge
Posts: 4,668 ✭✭✭✭✭
$860 & $865.
Any Comments?
Later, Paul.
Any Comments?
Later, Paul.
Later, Paul.
0
Comments
but I am trying to save a little cash for the fun show
Tim
I did pick up a 82d from teletrade in 7fb pop3
Tim
<< <i>yeah, they sold for a good price, wish I could have bought one of them
but I am trying to save a little cash for the fun show
Tim
I did pick up a 82d from teletrade in 7fb pop3
Tim >>
That's an interesting comment. I wonder if either or perhaps both of these specimens will wind up being sold at the FUN show. Anybody know of who the buyers are?
COMPLETE KENNEDY VARIETY SET, CIRCULATION STRIKES AND PROOFS
1964 MINT SET
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>I did pick up a 82d from teletrade in 7fb pop3 >>
Tim I think you got the better coin, also better deal in pop and price.
65/67FB 5/0 weight of 1 in the registry
82-D/67FB 2/0 weight of 2 in the registry
And if memory serves me right, prices were $860/$865 for the two 65's... price for the 82-D/$625.
A super coin with 2 point weight, a lower pop, and for over $200 less than either of the 65's.
That 82-d was on teletrade a month ago. Maybe it didn't really sell the first time or got returned by the buyer. You'll have to let us know if the coin is deserving of the grade. Many of these low pop dimes are not.
reserve price so they probable sent it back to teletrade, I should have it in hand this week
Hey Russ the dimes sell cheaper b/c they are some much smaller than the halfs (lol)
tim
<< <i>I just submitted 2 that should make ms67fb. Bad timing, I wish I had got mine back first. >>
Jaime anything else coming in Roosie's that you want to let us in on??
did you submit the 65 or the 82d that should make 67fb??
<< <i>that 82d from teletrade , was bought by someone then placed on ebay but did not reach there
reserve price so they probable sent it back to teletrade, I should have it in hand this week
tim >>
Tim, Thats exactly what happened. They tried to get greedy and of course they got burned and sent the coin back to TT and took a big loss. Dan60 is correct in stating that the better deal was the '82-D MS67FB. I believe that the pops on the 1965 will continue to rise vs. the 1982. '65 rolls are actually more attainable then the 82-D and cost 10x's less.
Later, Paul.
Later, Paul.
My only comment is, that (860) would get me an 1821 small date in AU55 or an early Merc tuff date in 64 or 65.
Jon
<< <i>
Tim, Thats exactly what happened. They tried to get greedy and of course they got burned and sent the coin back to TT and took a big loss. Dan60 is correct in stating that the better deal was the '82-D MS67FB. I believe that the pops on the 1965 will continue to rise vs. the 1982. '65 rolls are actually more attainable then the 82-D and cost 10x's less.
Later, Paul. >>
While I can't even imagine finding an MS-67 in either date roll, gems are much easier
in the '82-D rolls in my experience. '65 rolls are very common and there are still lots
sitting in safety deposit boxes but all I ever see in them is junk and stuff that would
be charitably described as MS-60. There are a few choice rolls around but I rarely will
even look at these rolls anymore.
<< <i>While I can't even imagine finding an MS-67 in either date roll, gems are much easier
in the '82-D rolls in my experience. '65 rolls are very common and there are still lots
sitting in safety deposit boxes but all I ever see in them is junk and stuff that would
be charitably described as MS-60. There are a few choice rolls around but I rarely will
even look at these rolls anymore. >>
CladKing:
The sheer fact that there are hundreds more collectors collecting the difficult 1965-1967 years is one contributing factor as to why there will be more of this date. Just look at the 2 purchasers of those 2 coins in question. They are collecting 2 high grade Roosies for their "Year" set, not for a "Roosie" set. These will probably never see a 100% dime set, unless they sell them off. I know Andrea and she is what I consider Stong Hands. That coin will not see a new owner for several years. I do not know the other guy.
As far as the 1982-D. Most of these rolls go for several $100 dollars and not many collectors will put out for that price. I would gather that there are actually quite a few 82 rolls and they are just sitting around. Doesn't the 82-P command North of $400 for a single roll now?
Later, Paul.
Later, Paul.
<< <i>
As far as the 1982-D. Most of these rolls go for several $100 dollars and not many collectors will put out for that price. I would gather that there are actually quite a few 82 rolls and they are just sitting around. Doesn't the 82-P command North of $400 for a single roll now?
Later, Paul. >>
I wasn't aware that the '82-D rolls would command such a premium to CDN price.
Most people don't realize these rolls are much more widely available than other dates of the
era because people set these aside. The high price is reflective of the fact that they are almost
the sole source for the coins while other dates are in mint sets. The other dates are scarcer
but no one cares because there are mint sets.
There is a steady demand for the '82-D which is difficult to meet from existing supply. I've sampled
thousands of these coins from rolls and in circulation as sliders and AU's. I've probably seen an
example from nearly every die. There are some nice coins but they are elusive. This one comes
nice in the souvenir set but choice gems are hardly common in the 20,000 mintage.
I wish I knew a reliable person that sold OBW clad rolls, then I could have a steady supply coming in. On that note, if anyone reads this and knows a "good" roll dealer, please share your information.
If I had it my way, stupidity would be painful!
If my submission goes poorly that'll be it, no more submitting. I just resubmitted 3 73-s Lincolns that pcgs had graded ms66 the first time. They're nicer than any ms67 S I've ever owned (over a dozen). This time, they graded ms65. I'm not putting up with this any more.
<< <i>I submitted a few each of 1965, 70,70-d,71,72, 73,73-d,76, 83-d. On a good day everything could go ms67. Likely I'll get some ms67's and the rest ms66s. The 1965s are the only ones that'll likely make fb. >>
Aren't you afraid of the SMS curse on the 1965's??
I gave up submitting the 1965-67's because of the curse.
and they're cold.
I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole."
Mary
Best Franklin Website
<< <i>The problem is finding "true" OBW rolls. So many have been opened and rewrapped that you need to see the rolls to know for sure what you are getting. Making sure you get a look at BOTH ends of the roll is also important.
I wish I knew a reliable person that sold OBW clad rolls, then I could have a steady supply coming in. On that note, if anyone reads this and knows a "good" roll dealer, please share your information.
Of course there are the big three; Kramer, Jarvis and another guy whose name escapes me right now,
but these guys have been around forever and they usually only distributed a few bags of each date and
sometimes even less. I think they're all still doing business but no one is going to be willing to make a
market in items that are impossible to locate and sell for close to face value.
Then there are the new guys like G&F galleries and Wayne Herndon. Everyone seems to like doing bus-
iness with the latter but I'd be sure to tell him up-front that you're looking only for original rolls. I'd guess
that the best place to find rolls would be to pick them up a few at a time on Ebay.
Back in the old days I'd pick up a roll of this and that as a sample and then re-order if there was anything
I liked. I almost never re-ordered.
Really, I have absolutely no idea how you guys find as many rolls as you do. I don't think I could have found
that many if I bought everything I could.