Ebay Second Offer ripoffs
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95458/95458bad48c880c7292134f5f8fa20c9ea75277d" alt="MCMLVTopps"
I recently bid on a high dollar baseball card. When the auction ended, I was 4th lowest in the final bidding. The next morning, I had a Second Offer for the card for my original bid of just over $1k. I knew of course it was a ripoff offer, as the card is pretty rare.
Was wondering if many collectors have been bitten by this outrageous tactic.
And, any idea if eBay is addressing this, or is it a situation of "they could care less"?
Was wondering if many collectors have been bitten by this outrageous tactic.
And, any idea if eBay is addressing this, or is it a situation of "they could care less"?
0
Comments
I was more curious to know if many people have been victimized by this ripoff.
huge revenue generators for sellers and for EBAY.
EBAY claims that far less than 3% of SCOs are scams,
but refuses to report the total number of legitimate SCOs.
There are numerous ways that scamsters can defeat EBAY's
"My Messages" security promise. The ONLY way to know for
sure if an SCO is legitimate is to contact the seller via telephone;
AND, when you do that, make sure the seller you are talking to,
REALLY IS the seller.
Scamsters are very glad that EBAY will never do away with
SCOs.
While I haven't been hit with a second-chance offer in the same way you have I have been shilled up until I lost and then immediately received the SCO after the auction ended. I think there should be some sort of middle ground on this. Let's say that the winning bidder is a schiller or just a deadbeat and screws the seller over .... the way I see it, the next highest bid should be one more increment up from what the third highest bidder bid. If the high bidder just shafts the seller than his/her bids shouldn't really count and the auction should be treated as though those bids were never entered.
I realize that this sort of throws a monkey wrench into the genuine SCO's out there for sellers who have multiple copies of a particular item but the way I see it, they should just be listing the fact that they have multiple copies available under the quantity section or listing multiple auctions. If a deal can't be worked out with the high-bidder for whatever reason (the high bidder is clearly not completing their end of the contract) than the auction should be treated as though that bidder never was involved. It would grossly cut down on schills.
Does anyone know if the seller has to pay fees on SCO's and, if so, are they comparable to the fees of listing an auction? Thanks
Arthur
Does anyone know if the seller has to pay fees on SCO's and, if so, are they comparable to the fees of listing an auction? Thanks
Arthur >>
if someone buys a second chance offer then yes, the seller pays the same selling/listing fees they would had the original buyer purchased the item.
Arthur
Doug
<< <i>Does anyone know if the seller has to pay fees on SCO's and, if so, are they comparable to the fees of listing an auction? Thanks
Arthur >>
if someone buys a second chance offer then yes, the seller pays the same selling/listing fees they would had the original buyer purchased the item. >>
Wrong.
Only selling fees are charged (i.e., NO listing fees).