Did anyone watch Mamba beat the Jazz by himself tonite..
RANDYMOSS84
Posts: 1,980
in Sports Talk
30 points of his 52 in the 3rd. GOAT
Kobe on his 52 "It felt like I was playing a video game"
It also looked like he was playing a video game.
Kobe on his 52 "It felt like I was playing a video game"
It also looked like he was playing a video game.
0
Comments
Selfish, rips apart teams, gets coaches fired, dominant centers traded, cheats on his wife, alleged rapist.
Yeah, what a winner.
<< <i>You've picked quite a player to idolize.
Selfish, rips apart teams, gets coaches fired, dominant centers traded, cheats on his wife, alleged rapist.
Yeah, what a winner. >>
Ax,
I cant stand Kobe either, but why is it ok for you to use something a person " allegedly " did against him at one moment, yet when discussing another ( McGwire ) the word allegedly holds no water with you ?
-- Yogi Berra
<< <i>
Ax,
I cant stand Kobe either, but why is it ok for you to use something a person " allegedly " did against him at one moment, yet when discussing another ( McGwire ) the word allegedly holds no water with you ? >>
Because there was physical evidence pointing to Kobe committing the act, while there is no such evidence for McGwire.
<< <i>
<< <i>
Ax,
I cant stand Kobe either, but why is it ok for you to use something a person " allegedly " did against him at one moment, yet when discussing another ( McGwire ) the word allegedly holds no water with you ? >>
Because there was physical evidence pointing to Kobe committing the act, while there is no such evidence for McGwire. >>
Nice spin.
Dunno why I bothered asking.
-- Yogi Berra
Your fascination with my posting is curious.
I cant stand Kobe either, but why is it ok for you to use something a person " allegedly " did against him at one moment, yet when discussing another ( McGwire ) the word allegedly holds no water with you ? >>
Because there was physical evidence pointing to Kobe committing the act, while there is no such evidence for McGwire.
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
<< <i>Who's spinning? You asked a question, I gave an answer.
Your fascination with my posting is curious. >>
My fascination ?
I respond to one of your posts every 3 weeks, dont flatter yourself big guy
-- Yogi Berra
<< <i> Because there was physical evidence pointing to Kobe committing the act, while there is no such evidence for McGwire. >>
Really? I guess McGwire coming up as a string bean and all of the sudden becoming Paul Bunyan only to beome a withered piece of jerky after retirement says nothing huh .......
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
<< <i>
<< <i> Because there was physical evidence pointing to Kobe committing the act, while there is no such evidence for McGwire. >>
Really? I guess McGwire coming up as a string bean and all of the sudden becoming Paul Bunyan only to beome a withered piece of jerky after retirement says nothing huh ....... >>
I put this in the appropriate thread but it's sooooooooooo worth repeating
<< <i>
Really? I guess McGwire coming up as a string bean and all of the sudden becoming Paul Bunyan only to beome a withered piece of jerky after retirement says nothing huh ....... >>
'All of a sudden'?
He was a rookie in what, 1986?
He was swatting 49 HRs as a 'string bean'.
He hit 70 in 1998...so in 12 years he bulked up. Why is that so difficult to comprehend?
You guys want to base your assumptions on rumor and innuendo...please show me proof, otherwise, knock it off.
edited to add: stown, good to see your petty personality has reared its head yet again...what happened to the 'unprovoked flames' you say you're against in your sig line?
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
<< <i> 'All of a sudden'?
He was a rookie in what, 1986?
He was swatting 49 HRs as a 'string bean'.
He hit 70 in 1998...so in 12 years he bulked up. Why is that so difficult to comprehend?
>>
oh, just for the record, I was commenting on his slim to HUGE to withered body. Did I mention HR totals? Nahhhhhh
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
<< <i>
oh, just for the record, I was commenting on his slim to HUGE to withered body. Did I mention HR totals? Nahhhhhh >>
nahhhh you didn't. But nahhhhh you failed to mention that a guy is going to get HUGE working out, maturing, over 12 years. but nahhhhh you couldn't possibly be wrong, could you? nahhhhh
<< <i>Thats fine Ax. If you want to believe that Mark McGwire is innocent of juicing because of the lack of proof of a needle hanging from his a$$ then that is your opinion. Hell, worked for OJ too didn't it! That poor innocent guy >>
There was physical evidence leaking OJ to the scene...bloody glove, blood in the bronco, let's not get retarded here. The jury blew it, plain and simple.
Did anyone really think Axtell could keep himself from name calling ? Nahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
<< <i>Big Mac was a cheater and the longer he is kept out of the Hall the better >>
Are you privy to information that no one else knows? Do you have evidence that PROVES he cheated? If not, your witch hunt mentality belongs no where near the hall.
Would you call Mike Schmidt a cheater for taking a federally banned substance (greenies) in order to improve his performance at the plate? Or is that ok because the moral police (i.e. YOU) don't think they give an advantage?
<< <i>Did anyone really think Axtell could keep himself from name calling ? Nahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh >>
nahhhhhhh I didn't call anyone names...did I? nahhhh you couldn't help but wait for a chance to get in a squabble. How funny is it how quickly this thread deviated from kobe bryant.
You yankee apologists need a new hobby in the offseason.
Don't waste your time and fees listing on ebay before getting in touch me by PM or at gregmo32@aol.com !
Not every word on these boards is cause for a world altering rumble just because an opinion that differs from yours is expressed.
-- Yogi Berra
War Kobe!
Come home Jerry West
<< <i>It is just impossible for someone to dissagree with you Ax without you starting a tirade of name calling, city bashing, and unfounded claims of derailment. >>
This coming from the guy who derailed the thread into McGwire town? Hilarious!
<< <i>Not every word on these boards is cause for a world altering rumble just because an opinion that differs from yours is expressed. >>
No one said it was...but if you wanted to talk McGwire, keep it in the McGwire thread. Why's that so difficult to understand? And city bashing? Grow up already...please. Do us all a favor and embrace maturity, ok?
<< <i>
<< <i>It is just impossible for someone to dissagree with you Ax without you starting a tirade of name calling, city bashing, and unfounded claims of derailment. >>
This coming from the guy who derailed the thread into McGwire town? Hilarious!
<< <i>Not every word on these boards is cause for a world altering rumble just because an opinion that differs from yours is expressed. >>
No one said it was...but if you wanted to talk McGwire, keep it in the McGwire thread. Why's that so difficult to understand? And city bashing? Grow up already...please. Do us all a favor and embrace maturity, ok? >>
Ax, mentioning McGwire was perfectly legitimate in this thread. It was related 100%. You commented on Kobes alleged activities, and I simply followed it up by noting one persons alleged activities are enough to condemn, while anothers ( McGwire ) were not.
Again with the personal attacks i noticed though..just cant help yourself can you ?
I swear, I have never encountered another human being in my life with a chip on his shoulder and poorer attitude than you.
This is all I am going to say on this, since I have managed to avoid getting into it with you and wasting my time for months now and intend to keep it that way. Have yourself a good night.
-- Yogi Berra
<< <i>
Ax, mentioning McGwire was perfectly legitimate in this thread. It was related 100%. You commented on Kobes alleged activities, and I simply followed it up by noting one persons alleged activities are enough to condemn, while anothers ( McGwire ) were not.
>>
Dude, drop it. If you want to ramble on incoherently about McGwire, you should do so in the thread with McGwire in it, not Kobe.
<< <i>Again with the personal attacks i noticed though..just cant help yourself can you ? >>
What's the matter princess? yankees aren't in the news while all the other teams are making big signings, so you're sad? Don't take it out on me.
<< <i>I swear, I have never encountered another human being in my life with a chip on his shoulder and poorer attitude than you. >>
Then why in god's name do you bother responding to me, cupcake? Christ if I have such a 'chip on my shoulder' and such a bad attitude, then why do you respond? I guess you love the abuse.
<< <i>This is all I am going to say on this, since I have managed to avoid getting into it with you and wasting my time for months now and intend to keep it that way. Have yourself a good night. >>
Hah! You've managed to avoid exactly nothing. Your posts in this very thread prove it.
Now, let's see if you can manage to not 'waste your time' and not reply.
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
I'll assume then you are for removing known 'cheaters' such as Mike Schmidt who have admitted that they frequently used greenies to rebound from night games the day after?
If not, you're a hypocrite.
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
<< <i>greenies were not muscle building coctails that give a player super human strength that distorted many outcomes of games and skewed many stats and records forever. Sorry, but that one holds no water. You might as well blast the guy who takes a aspirin for a headache too. >>
Greenies do allow a guy to recover from a late night game to improve his hitting for a day game the next day, and it was a widely used substance. If these 'greenies' didn't give a player a definite advantage at the plate, then why did they take them?
You want to give passes to guys who have freely admitted to playing the game while on federally banned substances, but blast guys for doing the same thing?
That, my friend, is the very definition of hypocrisy.
They would smoke some doobies, relax after a long game and go to sleep faster and harder. Because of this, they felt more refreshed the next day and performed better compared to had they not.
Most, if not all, ballplayers have smoked pot at one point or another during the season.
Do you see how ridiculous this is? Well, it's the same as comparing greenies to steroids.
Don't compare apples to oranges.