Options
I wonder if the mint will send out rejected ASE sets?

I returned 10 - 20th Ann. SAE sets to the mint and have received 5 replacements so far. The other 5 are listed as in stock and reserved. The 10 sets I returned all had milk spots and pitting of some kind on the reverse proofs. Now I wonder if the mint will send those out to someone else. I doubt that any of them would get anything better than a PR68, and would guess that two would have been body bagged for the spots. I wonder what the mint does with the returned sets? Do they melt them down or re-sell them?
Who is General Failure, and why is he reading my hard drive?
0
Comments
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
BST successful dealings with:MsMorrisine, goldman86
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
"Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
My order, which the mint screwed me on, says "3 units backordered. Expected to ship on 12/08/2006."
So.................... it looks like, you received 10 sets, returned all ten and have received 5 replacement sets in return yet those of us that have orders yet to be fulfilled still have to wait until 12/8?
I have no doubts in my mind that the mint DOES NOT MELT but REPACKAGES and RESHIPS returned merchandise. So, of all the sets that have been shipped and returned, it looks like those of us at the back of the line will end up with all the CRAP coins!
My thoughts are that if you return the sets, you should go to the back of the line and not get to go through their current stock to get what you like.
The name is LEE!
<< <i>They probably shipped them to me. Mine just shipped yesterday.
Or me, mine shipped yesterday too.
I'm probably "a day late and a dollar short" but I proceeded to order another set last night. They took the order and , no, I won't hold my breath.
"Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working" Pablo Picasso
Also notice the diagonal striations on the first two and a kind of "carpet" look on the surface of the replacement coin. I think that must be caused by two different sets of dies.
Herb
<< <i> I wonder what the mint does with the returned sets? Do they melt them down or re-sell them? >>
This thread about the SF Old Mint commems may shed light on that.
<< <i>My thoughts are that if you return the sets, you should go to the back of the line and not get to go through their current stock to get what you like. >>
Why should one have to accept crap and then be told to go to the end of the line when they want to exchange that crap for the good stuff they wanted in the first place? Most folks have expectations of high quality for proof manufactured coins and milk spots and gouges aren't part of those expectations.
If the mint has replacements to send out, why weren't those "replacements" sent to unfilled orders? If all orders had been filled before replacements were sent, I could understand but these have been shipping since OCTOBER 12th!
The name is LEE!
<< <i>If the mint has replacements to send out, why weren't those "replacements" sent to unfilled orders? If all orders had been filled before replacements were sent, I could understand but these have been shipping since OCTOBER 12th! >>
I sure wouldn't want to wait for 3 months to get replacements. I expect they take the returned sets, replace the obviously defective coins and use those to fulfill orders OR they just reship them and hope the new owners don't complain.
Hmm - Proof does not mean perfect these days.. and First Strike means early submission.
<< <i>Are they "defective" or merely mint "errors"? Maybe we should see re-evaluate the situation ...
Hmm - Proof does not mean perfect these days.. and First Strike means early submission. >>
To me, the ones I sent back were defective. If they had been "collector" errors- say die cracks, double strikes, broad struck, or die clashes I would have made a bundle of money. However, milk spots and pits made by the mint are generally considered damage as opposed to errors. No one wants damaged coins including me.
The thing that is troubling me is that I have not seen any other reports of milk spots or pits. Surely I did not receive the only 10 damaged sets out of 250,000 minted. I suspect that a lot of the PR68 grades are due to the spots, but at least two maybe four of mine did not measure up to even a PR68. I'm not overly critical (at least I don't think I am) and there are a lot of experienced collectors and dealers looking at the coins (not to mention PCGS, NGC, et. al.) so am I puzzled as to why I am the only one seeing them?
The other interesting fact is that the regular proof and the non-proof coins in the sets with the damaged RP proofs looked pretty good. There were no milk spots or pits - some had minor nicks, but overall they looked good.
<< <i>I sure wouldn't want to wait for 3 months to get replacements. I expect they take the returned sets, replace the obviously defective coins and use those to fulfill orders OR they just reship them and hope the new owners don't complain. >>
Why Not? Those of us that didn't get in on the first wave have to wait 3 months! What makes you, as a mint customer, any different than the rest of us?
In my opinion, the US Mint has some very serious customer issues and I sure as h3ll would like the opportunity to take one of their "survey's"!
The name is LEE!
<< <i>
<< <i>I sure wouldn't want to wait for 3 months to get replacements. I expect they take the returned sets, replace the obviously defective coins and use those to fulfill orders OR they just reship them and hope the new owners don't complain. >>
Why Not? Those of us that didn't get in on the first wave have to wait 3 months! What makes you, as a mint customer, any different than the rest of us?
In my opinion, the US Mint has some very serious customer issues and I sure as h3ll would like the opportunity to take one of their "survey's"! >>
I can understand your frustration and I would be feel the same in your position. However, I wish you would start your own thread to complain about the mint's order processing deficiencies.
<< <i>Here are some shots to show the two reverse proofs that I think would have been body bagged and one of the replacement coins. The spot inside the red circle is a mark I found on each of the ten RPs. At first I thought it was dust on my sensor or lens, but I rotated the coin and the spot stayed in the same place.
Also notice the diagonal striations on the first two and a kind of "carpet" look on the surface of the replacement coin. I think that must be caused by two different sets of dies.
Im glad you posted these pics. I went thru some for a friend last night, advising him what he should keep. Look at the rim at 2 & 10 o'clock, what causes the seeming non uniform rim at these positions? Ive noticed this one alot of the anniversery coins?
Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
<< <i>Why Not? Those of us that didn't get in on the first wave have to wait 3 months! What makes you, as a mint customer, any different than the rest of us? >>
I'm not saying that I would be any better than the rest of the Mint's customers; only that they should have gotten it right the first time.