It's more about skill and technique than the actual camera... true a higher quality camera is nice, but if you don't have the technique and skills to be able to take good pictures, it won't do you much, while if you have the techniques you can take good pictures even with a crappier camera...
With that being said, I prefer the Nikon Coolpix series of cameras...
<< <i>It's more about skill and technique than the actual camera... true a higher quality camera is nice, but if you don't have the technique and skills to be able to take good pictures, it won't do you much, while if you have the techniques you can take good pictures even with a crappier camera...
With that being said, I prefer the Nikon Coolpix series of cameras... >>
Comments
-Amanda
I'm a YN working on a type set!
My Buffalo Nickel Website Home of the Quirky Buffaloes Collection!
Proud member of the CUFYNA
This was taken with a camera that costs close to $100 brand new. The pictures are also much bigger-- I just sized this down.
Russ, NCNE
With that being said, I prefer the Nikon Coolpix series of cameras...
42/92
It's an excellent camera for the money, once you learn how to use it (e.g., setting the white balance).
-- Adam Duritz, of Counting Crows
My Ebay Auctions
<< <i>It's more about skill and technique than the actual camera... true a higher quality camera is nice, but if you don't have the technique and skills to be able to take good pictures, it won't do you much, while if you have the techniques you can take good pictures even with a crappier camera...
With that being said, I prefer the Nikon Coolpix series of cameras... >>
this is true. its technique more than the camera.
i use a coolpix L3, link to a good site
edited to add pic
"Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
http://www.american-legacy-coins.com
a lot has to do with lighting...more has to do with technique...just a little depends on the camera
although macro (or a similiar lens) is necessary.