More VAM crossover sillyness
DennisH
Posts: 14,009 ✭✭✭✭✭
Economy crossovers, all coins submitted in their holders, VAM attributions not requested. Awesome turnaround time!!!
Line #1 was submitted for a friend and is the BIG happy dance of this bunch. (Any of you who have ever tried to find a VAM 123 know what a monster b*tch it is!) Lines #2 and #3 are two more examples of why I no longer take DNCs as a personal failure or slap in the face. The first time I submitted them for crossover I speciifed a minimum AU50 for each and neither one crossed. No, they do not appear to be 8 points apart in quality. Oh well...
1 1 08526602 7074 1878 7TF $1 Reverse of 1878 US VF30
VAM 123, was ANACS-30
2 1 08526603 7082 1878-S $1 US XF45
VAM 50, was ANACS-55, specified minimum XF45
3 1 08526604 7082 1878-S $1 US AU53
VAM 50, was ANACS-55, specified minimum XF45
4 1 08526605 7298 1921-D $1 US MS62
VAM 1B1, was NGC-62, expected MS62
5 1 08526606 7180 1887-S $1 US MS62
VAM 2, was PCI-63, expected MS62
6 1 08526607 7264 1900 $1 US MS63
VAM 30A, was NTC-65, expected MS63
7 1 08526608 7292 1904-O $1 US MS63
VAM 28B, was ANACS-63, expected MS63
8 1 08526609 7184 1888-O $1 US MS63
VAM 1B2, was ICG-64, expected MS63
9 1 08526610 7162 1885-O $1 US MS64
strike-through coin, was PCI-64, expected MS63
10 1 08526611 7296 1921 $1 Morgan US MS63
VAM 27 MDS, was NGC-63, specified minimum MS63
11 1 08526612 97075 1878 7TF $1 Reverse of 1878 US DNC
VAM 195A, is PCI-64DM, specified minimum MS64DM
Date Received: 8/23/2006
Grades Posted: 9/22/2006
Line #1 was submitted for a friend and is the BIG happy dance of this bunch. (Any of you who have ever tried to find a VAM 123 know what a monster b*tch it is!) Lines #2 and #3 are two more examples of why I no longer take DNCs as a personal failure or slap in the face. The first time I submitted them for crossover I speciifed a minimum AU50 for each and neither one crossed. No, they do not appear to be 8 points apart in quality. Oh well...
1 1 08526602 7074 1878 7TF $1 Reverse of 1878 US VF30
VAM 123, was ANACS-30
2 1 08526603 7082 1878-S $1 US XF45
VAM 50, was ANACS-55, specified minimum XF45
3 1 08526604 7082 1878-S $1 US AU53
VAM 50, was ANACS-55, specified minimum XF45
4 1 08526605 7298 1921-D $1 US MS62
VAM 1B1, was NGC-62, expected MS62
5 1 08526606 7180 1887-S $1 US MS62
VAM 2, was PCI-63, expected MS62
6 1 08526607 7264 1900 $1 US MS63
VAM 30A, was NTC-65, expected MS63
7 1 08526608 7292 1904-O $1 US MS63
VAM 28B, was ANACS-63, expected MS63
8 1 08526609 7184 1888-O $1 US MS63
VAM 1B2, was ICG-64, expected MS63
9 1 08526610 7162 1885-O $1 US MS64
strike-through coin, was PCI-64, expected MS63
10 1 08526611 7296 1921 $1 Morgan US MS63
VAM 27 MDS, was NGC-63, specified minimum MS63
11 1 08526612 97075 1878 7TF $1 Reverse of 1878 US DNC
VAM 195A, is PCI-64DM, specified minimum MS64DM
Date Received: 8/23/2006
Grades Posted: 9/22/2006
When in doubt, don't.
0
Comments
VAM 195A, is PCI-64DM, specified minimum MS64DM
PCGS doesn't attribute this VAM do they?
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
No, they don't attribute VAM 195A. But the point of submitting this coin is, a 64DMPL in a PCGS holder is worth $800, while a 63DMPL is $140. A PCI-64DMPL isn't even worth somewhere comfortably in the middle.
You did pretty well with yours.
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member