EF, AU or?

ajaan · September 17, 2006 5:31AM

1jester · September 17, 2006 5:49AM

AU50

dcamp78 · September 17, 2006 5:49AM

I'm assuming the white spots on the obverse are pieces of paper from the flips.
Is that verdigris above the P on the obverse or a stain?

I'd say that it's EF easy, I'd have to look at it closer to give it an AU.
It looks like there is some wear on the reverse, but very little.

Nice coin though.

laurentyvan · September 17, 2006 6:06AM

High quality EF, perhaps AU, agree with the reverse wear.

MacCrimmon · September 17, 2006 6:40AM

<< <i>

>>

Bodybag for PVC. Looks like 'greenies' are lurking in multiple recesses, IMO.

danglen · September 17, 2006 7:25AM

I have to agree with Mac.

grayroads · September 17, 2006 9:11AM

Have to give it an XF; the reverse holds it back from being AU. A split grade au/xf would be realistic. Still a nice coin. Bob

coinkat · September 17, 2006 10:04AM

I am concerned about little green things too... I would rather see the coin. If I am just seeing things... then AU50 is reasonable

ajaan · September 17, 2006 10:06AM

The green looks more like dirt to me on the actual coin. Not nearly as bad as the large image suggests.

Numismatics · September 17, 2006 12:33PM

I will say XF45 (EF/AU).

lordmarcovan · September 18, 2006 12:43PM

I would say AU53.

coinpictures · September 18, 2006 9:41PM

My first thought is EF45, but it would depend on what the surfaces are like. If flat/dead, then EF45, but if there's any decent portion of lustre remaining, I'd push it to AU50... I like to see at least a little bit of lustre before calling something AU.

EF, AU or?

Comments