Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

I NEED THIS CARD!

image What a great scan! (sarcasm) Why bother listing a card with a scan like this?

nice scan

image



matt

Comments

  • " This scan is not the best "

    No, you don't say lol


    Matt, i'd be afraid that thats what the card actually looks like

    Dave
  • What's funny is that every one of his other auctions has crystal
    clear pictures. I bet you the card does look like that
    because the holder and the screw looks pretty clear. image
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    looks like some million dollar art piece.


    lol

    steve


    edited to add: well, maybe not
    Good for you.
  • StingrayStingray Posts: 8,843 ✭✭✭
    Appears that the scan is ok, it is just the card has issues??
  • detroitfan2detroitfan2 Posts: 3,337 ✭✭✭✭
    If you look at the scan quickly, it looks like it could be a card of Barry Sanders. Maybe the seller's hoping that he'll get more for the card if he deceives people into thinking that it's a card of a good running back?
  • GDM67GDM67 Posts: 2,526 ✭✭✭✭
    ^ My Plan

    1. Laugh

    2. Put on helmet

    3. Duck and cover
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Actually if you stare at it just right you will see it...............

    Steve
    Good for you.
  • shagrotn77shagrotn77 Posts: 5,607 ✭✭✭✭
    Here's another one for you guys:

    "I want $770 for this card. My steadfast policy is to scan all my cards the size of a stamp...in order to slow down the global warming process of course!"

    Minnie TB
    "My father would womanize, he would drink. He would make outrageous claims like he invented the question mark. Sometimes he would accuse chestnuts of being lazy. The sort of general malaise that only the genius possess and the insane lament. Our childhood was typical. Summers in Rangoon, luge lessons. In the spring we'd make meat helmets. When we were insolent we were placed in a burlap bag and beaten with reeds - pretty standard really."
  • rbdjr1rbdjr1 Posts: 4,474 ✭✭
    matt, I was thinkin' about the, I think it was 1986 Sportflics Pete Rose. I have a handful of varieties. When you move the card a little the picture changes. When I scanned these items, it seemed to catch multiple images at the same time and what was a beautiful looking card in real life, looked a little messed-up, via the scan, as the pic was a type of 3-D, but the scan picked-up a two dimensional view of two different pics at the same time. Sorry if I'm not explaining all this a little clearer but,,,, image ....this is most likely not the case with this card, but it just may be a nice lookin' example if it turned out to be one of those 3-D, "mutiple images" cards, that just do not seem to scan accurately.

    Just the "smallest of movement" with one of those "multiple images cards", will change the picture. And if you move the card just a "tiny bit" you could witness a total mess of multiple images, maybe even simular to the said item in question here.

    Oh bull, who am I kidding, that card scan really sucks! image

    P.S. I just "dug-out of my stash", a few examples of what I'm attempting to explain (...and most likley did a cr@ppy job tryin'!). I took a "few takes" to even get the scans this good, to represent the image desired, and my examples are of the highest end of the scale. The seller in question, seemed to scan the said card in a scratch-up thick sleeve, that most likely "distorted the scanned pic even more"!

    This seller should be dragged-out of his house and beatin' to a pulp by a bunch of crazed Emmitt Smith sportscard junkies in front of his neighbors and children! image

    rd

    image
Sign In or Register to comment.