Tom Glavine, which is his "key" rookie card?
digicat
Posts: 8,551 ✭✭
He's 13 wins away from the 300 win mark and is probably already getting photographed for his HoF plaque.
There's a "300 Game Winners Rookie Cards" reg set as well as a "Hall of Fame Players - Post War Rookies" set that he'll get a card with.
Which of his cards should be his representative card for these sets?
All his cards are from the 1988 glut year, all readily avaliable.
Of the 4, the 88 Donruss seems to be the toughest to get in high grade. Only 27% of the cards submitted got a 9 or higher (3% 10s).
That's a major contract to Fleer (87%) and Topps (84%). Score's the next toughest with only 55%.
Currently, the SMR has the Score rookie at $50 in a PSA 10, with the others under $30.
There's a "300 Game Winners Rookie Cards" reg set as well as a "Hall of Fame Players - Post War Rookies" set that he'll get a card with.
Which of his cards should be his representative card for these sets?
All his cards are from the 1988 glut year, all readily avaliable.
Of the 4, the 88 Donruss seems to be the toughest to get in high grade. Only 27% of the cards submitted got a 9 or higher (3% 10s).
That's a major contract to Fleer (87%) and Topps (84%). Score's the next toughest with only 55%.
Currently, the SMR has the Score rookie at $50 in a PSA 10, with the others under $30.
0
Comments
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
i think the glossy is the most difficult, but like digi said, i don't know that they are included in the sets mentioned.
Thanks,
David (LD_Ferg)
1985 Topps Football (starting in psa 8) - #9 - started 05/21/06
I adore Tom and have for a long, long time, and the Fleer has always been my favorite.
Currently collecting 1934 Butterfinger, 1969 Nabisco, 1991 Topps Desert Shield (in PSA 9 or 10), and 1990 Donruss Learning Series (in PSA 10).
<< <i>To answer your question, I think the regular Score version is the one that will be used for the 300 game winners and HOF rookies sets. That is his most popular/valuable mainstream rookie. >>
Shag - since when has the Score been the more popular card? Is it after grading became popular? The only reason I ask is because in the early 90's I was buying Glavine RCs and the Fleer was always the card that was more popular and sold for the most. The Score, Topps and Donruss RCs all were viewed the same back then.
Since the Fleer was made from sturdier paper stock, I can understand why it would tend to grade out better than the others, but I'm not sure if I agree that better availability in high grade should make it any less desirable from a registry perspective.
Why do you think the Score RC is selling for more nowadays though? It just seems weird because it was just one of the other junk RCs back then. I'm thinking that the scarcity of the Score Traded sets from '88 might be transferring over to the base Score set?
<< <i>I think it is probably the condition sensitivity that pushed the Glavine Score rookie slightly ahead of the others. Personally, I like the Fleer better because of the superior card stock that you mentioned previously. I guess the good thing is that you could buy all of his base rookies in PSA 10 for well under $100. >>
Yeah, I can definitely see how the condition will make the Score harder to get in high grade. I just find it a little odd that the most valuable card now was one of the undesirable cards 15 years ago. Very true too on how affordable all of his basic RCs are. Even the Score RC can be picked up for around $10-15 in a PSA 10 nowadays.
CDsNuts, 1/9/15
<< <i>The Score Glossy in a 10 may just kill me before it's over. >>
You and me, too.
I see from your set list that we're largely on the same wavelength. Any reason you don't collect Smoltz?