I find that coin rather appealing as far as the coin goes. The price for such a historical coin is still too high. How many people can say they have owned a real one before. Not too many, so some collector will be happy to own it.
<< <i>I find that coin rather appealing as far as the coin goes. The price for such a historical coin is still too high. How many people can say they have owned a real one before. Not too many, so some collector will be happy to own it. >>
I agree with you. ER should blow us away with a pic of his pretty soon, however.
<< <i>I find that coin rather appealing as far as the coin goes. The price for such a historical coin is still too high. How many people can say they have owned a real one before. Not too many, so some collector will be happy to own it. >>
I agree with you. ER should blow us away with a pic of his pretty soon, however. >>
Comments
That would make my day if I dug it up while out detecting (somebody probably did), but otherwise, I wouldn't want it anywhere near me!
<< <i>I find that coin rather appealing as far as the coin goes. The price for such a historical coin is still too high. How many people can say they have owned a real one before. Not too many, so some collector will be happy to own it. >>
I agree with you. ER should blow us away with a pic of his pretty soon, however.
<< <i>I would think they could spit shine that a little bit- at least remove a little crust......
That was my first thought. Then I got to thinking what the coin would look like and what details would be lost. Crust is most likely better left on.
<< <i>
<< <i>I find that coin rather appealing as far as the coin goes. The price for such a historical coin is still too high. How many people can say they have owned a real one before. Not too many, so some collector will be happy to own it. >>
I agree with you. ER should blow us away with a pic of his pretty soon, however.
I am a collector
And things, well things
They tend to accumulate