1972 mays- any way this could be a psa 9?
Ahmanfan
Posts: 4,395 ✭✭✭✭
what do you guys think... just from what you can see?
thanks
John
Collecting
HOF SIGNED FOOTBALL RCS
HOF SIGNED FOOTBALL RCS
0
Comments
My Auctions
Matt
1994 Pro Line Live
TheDallasCowboyBackfieldProject
* C. PASCUAL BASIC #3
* T. PEREZ BASIC #4 100%
* L. TIANT BASIC #1
* DRYSDALE BASIC #4 100%
* MAGIC MASTER #4/BASIC #3
* PALMEIRO MASTER/BASIC #1
* '65 DISNEYLAND #2
* '78 ELVIS PRESLEY #6
* '78 THREE'S COMPANY #1
WaltDisneyBoards
HOF SIGNED FOOTBALL RCS
1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better
Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete
<< <i>Check out the centering and corners on this PSA 9 Carew. The left side is rather rough cut also. >>
Actually the bottom two corners on the Carew show wear.
I need a 9 , but passed on this one.
Loves me some shiny!
Could ya rescan for more detail but just show the corners?
The centering does fall within the range of a 9 IMO - your card is somewhere between 65/35 and 60/40
R-L.
mike
<< <i>
<< <i>Check out the centering and corners on this PSA 9 Carew. The left side is rather rough cut also. >>
Actually the bottom two corners on the Carew show wear.
I need a 9 , but passed on this one. >>
I think the upper right shows wear too. I just had some 72's come back as 6's that look that nice. I thought they were 8's and that's why they are cracked out already
My Auctions
I would expect an 8 on the Mays, but I don't think a 9 is out of the question. I've certainly seen 9s with worse centering. Check out the centering on this 1978 Topps FB Wilbur Summers. I know it's a different issue, but, still... it seems they let it slide now and then.