<< <i>Pretty coin but how can they call it MS-68 with those scratches on the left shield? >>
I don't disagree with you, but this is precisely the reason why posting any coin in this forum which is less than absolutely perfect is a terrible idea. And I include myself in that comment. Something about sitting there in front of your computer makes you immediately want to find some fleck or scratch to point out.
Given a point for the color maybe. The hairlines/scratches on the shield bother me too. It'll still sell for premium bucks. I wonder if it's more attractive in person. Still a gorgeous coin. Nice originality.
Just to play devil's advocate, the image is huge, and the scratches relatively small. With the lighting, you can't really tell depth. It's very possible that in hand, with the full lustre, the scratches are far less visible. Of course, it's also possible that the coin is overgraded, and that's that.
Always took candy from strangers Didn't wanna get me no trade Never want to be like papa Working for the boss every night and day --"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
Purdy coin, but those scratches stick out like a sore thumb. If they were in some more inconspicuous area, I wouldn't care as much, but they're very prominent on a big piece of empty. I agree that the color gave it a bump in grade.
"Just to play devil's advocate, the image is huge, and the scratches relatively small. With the lighting, you can't really tell depth. It's very possible that in hand, with the full lustre, the scratches are far less visible."
The images are indeed huge but I think it is possible to determine the width and depth of the scratches by looking at the images.
Wow dizz that sez it all..it is SO after the fact, and i am a pcgs guy but i honestly was gonna say..68 ok maybe but star too? not at pcgs..to my knowlege..and its been a bit..2 graded at pcgs..tough to get a 68 on that coin on our side of the road.. bruce scher
Comments
-Amanda
I'm a YN working on a type set!
My Buffalo Nickel Website Home of the Quirky Buffaloes Collection!
Proud member of the CUFYNA
<< <i>Pretty coin but how can they call it MS-68 with those scratches on the left shield? >>
I don't disagree with you, but this is precisely the reason why posting any coin in this forum which is less than absolutely perfect is a terrible idea. And I include myself in that comment. Something about sitting there in front of your computer makes you immediately want to find some fleck or scratch to point out.
<< <i>Pretty coin but how can they call it MS-68 with those scratches on the left shield? >>
NGC
<< <i>NGC >>
Did you see that PCGS-graded "MS-65" $20 Lib posted here recently?
Didn't wanna get me no trade
Never want to be like papa
Working for the boss every night and day
--"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
The images are indeed huge but I think it is possible to determine the width and depth of the scratches by looking at the images.
<< <i>One for Amanda >>
Are we to assume this will soon be a gift to Amanda ????
That's very nice of you ...
Beautiful coin!
bruce scher
TorinoCobra71