PSA Should Remove Cards Like These from Circulation
Morgoth
Posts: 3,950 ✭✭✭
Who thinks PSA should spend some of it's money to remove cards like these from circulation. They should hire anonymous buyers who do nothing but keep these from public viewing. That's just awful.1963 Topps PSA 8 Clemente
Currently completing the following registry sets: Cardinal HOF's, 1961 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1972 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1980 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, Bill Mazeroski Master & Basic Sets, Roberto Clemente Master & Basic Sets, Willie Stargell Master & Basic Sets and Terry Bradshaw Basic Set
0
Comments
Fantastic condition!
Four crisp corners
Terrific colors
Great centering
To be fair it seems that is how the other grading companies operate as well.
If it was PERFECT in every other way, I could call it an 8. However, it looks from the picture as if at least one of the bottom corners is showing white.
There's some cracking along the right part of the slab too...
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
I will have to take your word on the pixel count, but that looks closer to 85/15 to me based on a quick glance. My opinion remains that NM-MT to MINT cards need to have at least 60/40 centering for 8 level, and at least 55/45 to be a 9. Seems that both SGC and PSA have centering req's that are loose and are quite different than mine.
edited to add .... if you need to count pixels to determine centering, it isn't centered.
Mark Mulder rookies
Chipper Jones rookies
Orlando Cabrera rookies
Lawrence Taylor
Sam Huff
Lavar Arrington
NY Giants
NY Yankees
NJ Nets
NJ Devils
1950s-1960s Topps NY Giants Team cards
Looking for Topps rookies as well.
References:
GregM13
VintageJeff
GO MARLINS! Home of the best fans in baseball!!
<< <i>Looks like it was fairly graded. Meets all the criteria for a PSA 8. What's the problem? >>
Let's start with you.
Loves me some shiny!
<< <i>Looks like it was fairly graded. Meets all the criteria for a PSA 8. What's the problem? >>
How can you say that when the centering falls outside of the PSA guidelines of 70/30???
<< <i>
<< <i>Looks like it was fairly graded. Meets all the criteria for a PSA 8. What's the problem? >>
How can you say that when the centering falls outside of the PSA guidelines of 70/30??? >>
One should never take DaBigHurt's posts literally. He answers as if he was a "Joe Orlando-type" spokesperson for PSA. Treat all his responses accordingly.
The ability to recognize satire seems to have become a lost art........
1957 Topps PSA
1961 Fleer SGC
Mark Mulder rookies
Chipper Jones rookies
Orlando Cabrera rookies
Lawrence Taylor
Sam Huff
Lavar Arrington
NY Giants
NY Yankees
NJ Nets
NJ Devils
1950s-1960s Topps NY Giants Team cards
Looking for Topps rookies as well.
References:
GregM13
VintageJeff
<< <i>and I'm not even going to get started about how the right side of the holder appears to be seriously cracked. >>
i noticed this..
i noticed this..
me too, but the seller seems to really like caffeine so i attributed the crack to Dbl. expresso jitters while scanning
00000001 = Wagner
01000001= 34 Goudey Gehrig which I believe to be the second card through the door?
Then it goes to 01000099 which is a Desert Shield Griffey then it stops and I am guessing the next group is
02000001 which would be #101 = 52 Topps Lou Kretlow then to this Clemente?
Purely a guess ?
ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
<< <i>Hey Southern You should keep your trap shut as there are many SGC 88s out there with equal or worse centering. >>
Hell, I had an SGC 92 [and this was after the split grades, so it was 8.5, too], that upon cracking and submitting to PSA came back as PSA 8 o/c. And it deserved that grade....
<< <i>If this card came out of the WIWAG fiasco then wouldn't PSA have the cert's that were affected and could get this card pulled? They needed to print a list of all possible affected cards so we wouldn't have to speculate when one came up. >>
It's too early to be a WIWAG. They did away with that font well before that went down.