Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Eisenhower Gift Grade ?!?

19Lyds19Lyds Posts: 26,492 ✭✭✭✭
Would one of the IKE Experts please explain how this coin could have gotten an MS66 Grade?

Heritage Link

image

It may have great luster but that scrape in front of IKEs eye is pretty serious not to mention that huge gouge below the bust to the right of the MM!

I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.



The name is LEE!

Comments

  • cupronikcupronik Posts: 773 ✭✭✭
    That coin was apparently graded over four years ago.

    These days I routinely receive Ikes better than this 78-D in MS-64 holders from PCGS.
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,726 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That big "gouge" under the "L" is actually a very shallow scrape. The one by the "8" appears to be in the plastic.

    I suspect that the coin is a knockout in hand and has a slightly PL reverse. It's surprising they gave it the bump since this date isn't that tough in gem. Looks like a low end 65 with a bump to me.

    It's almost certainly a mint set coin.
    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,726 ✭✭✭✭✭
    In quarters it is much easier to differentiate between mint set coins and those made for circulation because there were so very few saved that any coin well struck by new dies has an extremely high probability of coming from a mint set. With Ikes it's more problematical because they were more actively collected and saved. Collectors are more likely to seek and retain nice specimens than poor from any source. There were also a much higher number of gems (proportionately) made for general circulation in the Ikes. Obviously all gem Ikes are quite scarce. Still the newness of the die that struck this specimen stands out. The rich, dense, creamy luster is extremely typical of the mint set coins for this date. And even that die looks familiar. The coins made for circulation in '78 had a sort of "lighter" look to them. They are bright and very white without the "closely packed" look of the mint set coins.
    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • Steve27Steve27 Posts: 13,275 ✭✭✭
    "The one by the "8" appears to be in the plastic."

    That looks like a reed mark on the coin to me.

    IMO it's no better than a 64.
    "It's far easier to fight for principles, than to live up to them." Adlai Stevenson
  • 19Lyds19Lyds Posts: 26,492 ✭✭✭✭
    Well, I've looked at the Heritage image over and over again and I just do not think that the gouge above the "8" is in the plastic. There appears to be nothing else that would indicate a mishandled slab.

    It will be interesting to see where the hammer falls on this piece!
    I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.



    The name is LEE!
  • GoldenEyeNumismaticsGoldenEyeNumismatics Posts: 13,187 ✭✭✭
    maybe it was 5 pm on a friday when this coin was graded image
  • RampageRampage Posts: 9,512 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wow. That looks like an MS64 to me, too.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file