Home World & Ancient Coins Forum
Options

Need real world pricing on this half farthing.

Pictures aren't worth squat, but should give you an idea of the color/toning. I know what the Krause and Spink say, but I don't know realistic they are. I've seen plenty of these in grades up to AU, but not in mint state very often.

The prices are gone from the web page from the Colin Cooke auction, so I don't know how much theirs went for.

Great Britain 1/2 Farthing, 1844. E/N in REGINA. NGC MS63 BN.

imageimage

Comments

  • Options
    $40-$50. Just a guess.
    Terry

    eBay Store

    DPOTD Jan 2005, Meet the Darksiders
  • Options
    coinpicturescoinpictures Posts: 5,345 ✭✭✭
    ??????

    For the E/N variety?

    Krause lists it at $200 in UNC and Spink lists it at 175 pounds.

    Why so low? You don't like the color?
  • Options
    Hi,
    Colin's went for £300- it was however VERY nice.
    He has sold UNC before for nearer £100

    Teg
  • Options
    coinpicturescoinpictures Posts: 5,345 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Hi,
    Colin's went for �300- it was however VERY nice.
    He has sold UNC before for nearer �100

    Teg >>



    Ok, that makes me feel better. The one above cost me about 92 pounds including shipping.
  • Options
    7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This date turns up with frequency, but if you like it, go for it...
    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • Options
    coinpicturescoinpictures Posts: 5,345 ✭✭✭
    I'm either being obtuse or am not communicating effectively.

    Yes, the 1844 is the most common date of the series. You can't swing a dead cat without hitting a dozen of them. I probably own 5-10 examples.

    But I'm not talking about a plain 1844, yet some seem to be assuming that I am.

    The E/N variety is a major variety listed in both Krause and Spink. It is NOT the same as a plain 1844.

    Or does everyone else simply treat the E/N the same as a plain 1844, and Krause and Spink have it wrong?
  • Options
    SYRACUSIANSYRACUSIAN Posts: 6,448 ✭✭✭✭
    OK we got it.


    If you could post a picture of the regular and the E/A obverses side by side, we could perhaps understand the visual difference too, I don't see any slash (/) between E and N in REGINA. image
    Dimitri



    myEbay



    DPOTD 3
  • Options
    UdoUdo Posts: 984 ✭✭
    image

    I agree with Dimitri, side by side pics would be of interest for me too. image
    imageimage
  • Options
    coinpicturescoinpictures Posts: 5,345 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I don't see any slash (/) between E and N in REGINA. image >>




    image




    image





    image
  • Options
    MacCrimmonMacCrimmon Posts: 7,054 ✭✭✭


    << <i>OK we got it.


    If you could post a picture of the regular and the E/A obverses side by side, we could perhaps understand the visual difference too, I don't see any slash (/) between E and N in REGINA. image >>



    imageimageimage
  • Options
    Sorry , I missed the variety. So, no idea.
    Terry

    eBay Store

    DPOTD Jan 2005, Meet the Darksiders
  • Options
    GDJMSPGDJMSP Posts: 799


    << <i>Pictures aren't worth squat, but should give you an idea of the color/toning. I know what the Krause and Spink say, but I don't know realistic they are. I've seen plenty of these in grades up to AU, but not in mint state very often.

    The prices are gone from the web page from the Colin Cooke auction, so I don't know how much theirs went for.

    Great Britain 1/2 Farthing, 1844. E/N in REGINA. NGC MS63 BN. >>




    Try this one - Victoria, Half-Farthing, 1844, with E over N in regina, (Peck 1595; S.3951)
    knowledge ........ share it
Sign In or Register to comment.