ANACS missed the boat. Keep or throw back?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04cfa/04cfab6cdb03111020c9ad660fd2b70db9cd07e2" alt="coinpictures"
Picked up a British Penny, 1831, in an ANACS EF45 holder for $96 net on Ebay, which had it been a legitimate EF45, wouldn't be a bad deal.
I think ANACS screwed the pooch. Too much wear on the hair, a hit on the base of the bust (you can't really see it in the pics), and a few rim nicks. I'd give it a VF35 most likely.
I contacted the seller about returning the coin, and he's amenable to doing a full refund minus S&H (he said that he agrees that ANACS overgraded it and that I'm the second person wanting to return the coin).
But he also tossed out this option: Keep the coin for $50 and he'd refund the difference.
What do you think? Keep for half price, or return? Pics below.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88a57/88a5772c3ec119f9aba4dbcde73f0877c71979aa" alt="image"
I think ANACS screwed the pooch. Too much wear on the hair, a hit on the base of the bust (you can't really see it in the pics), and a few rim nicks. I'd give it a VF35 most likely.
I contacted the seller about returning the coin, and he's amenable to doing a full refund minus S&H (he said that he agrees that ANACS overgraded it and that I'm the second person wanting to return the coin).
But he also tossed out this option: Keep the coin for $50 and he'd refund the difference.
What do you think? Keep for half price, or return? Pics below.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88a57/88a5772c3ec119f9aba4dbcde73f0877c71979aa" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1831e/1831e7f4c9f724a7a4444b7f7b319c74d735ab62" alt="image"
0
Comments
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Doug
WNC Coins, LLC
1987-C Hendersonville Road
Asheville, NC 28803
wnccoins.com
No, the seller offered two options:
1. Return the coin for full refund minus S&H
2. Keep the coin and get a $43 refund
The question is "Is the coin worth keeping for $53 net, given that it's a high-end VF rather than an XF?"
I really need to start paying attention to what I type...
1/2 Cents
U.S. Revenue Stamps
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
1/2 Cents
U.S. Revenue Stamps
<< <i>..... Too much wear on the hair, a hit on the base of the bust (you can't really see it in the pics), and a few rim nicks. I'd give it a VF35 most likely...... >>
Think about the coin, itself. It's a VF35, in your opinion. Do you like it?? Is a VF35 acceptable in your collection (or are you trying to build an XF set?). If you can get past this, and like the coin on it's own merits, then you need to decide if $50 is a fair price that you are willing to pay for it. Once you get past that, then crack it out, and be happy with a raw coin in VF that you paid a fair price for.
I'm afraid to be alive without being aware of it
My OmniCoin Collection
My BankNoteBank Collection
Tom, formerly in Albuquerque, NM.
Well, just Love coins, period.
I've sent a 2005 Satin Finish WJ nickels into ANACS for grading -- several different batches, both before and after the move. Since it was the same type/date/mint of coin over and over again, it was pretty easy to judge the concistancy in their grading. IMO, they seem to have tightened up on their grades since the move. Nickels that were grading MS68/MS67 9 months ago are now coming back MS67/MS66. I don't know if that is a trend, or the luck of the draw for the what grader I got. But if they are grading tighter now, then a resubmit of that coin might be worth it, especially if you have some other coins to submit at the same time.
KR
1/2 Cents
U.S. Revenue Stamps