Dave Parker!
Skinpinch
Posts: 1,531
in Sports Talk
The more I look at it, and the more I look back, the Cobra was simply a stud.
0
Comments
JS
Parker at 365 runs above average.
Molitor at 328
Puckett at 239
Rice at 189
The measurement isn't pefect, as it gives credit to the batter of the good/bad deeds of the baserunners that were on base, i.e thrown out on base, or advancing extra. But it paints a pretty strong picture.
I always liked Parker, my lasting image of him was against Toronto with Oakland in the 1989 play-offs. Early in the series Kelly Gruber sounded off about how the Oakland batters were styling around the bases after their homers. The next game Parker hit a long homer and after taking about half an hour to get to third he waved his finger scoldingly at Gruber. Gruber did not say another word.
JS - You probably should have listed them earlier.
I always liked Parker as a young kid too. Some of my earliest baseball memories were of the Pirates. I dont know if it was on TWIB, but it seemed him, Madlock, Stargell and them were always on TV, even in the NY area. Back in the late 70's and early 80's there was a huge amount of Pittsburgh coverage between them and the Steelers. The coke commercial with Mean Joe Greene made me beg my father for a jersey when I was 6. i thought he was the greatest guy in the world at that age for giving that kid his jersey !
-- Yogi Berra
Combine that with his drug problems and I'd imagine he's not going to get a lot of support for the HOF. He doesn't have the magic numbers anyway. He's there with Jim Rice, Dick Allen, Fred Lynn, Andre Dawson --- great at times, but not for long enough period.
Don't get me wrong, he was great --- just not HOF great for enough years.
Erik
Not playing early enough? Maybe he has a gripe. Their outfield was good, and he found himself behind some good talent. Or maybe he was upset that RObertson was still playing too much, and that Stargell should have been moved to 1B two years sooner. Either way, he probably was good enough to be playing full time his first couple of seasons, or maybe called up a season sooner. Just think how differently he would be viewed with those extra 1,000 at bats? He would have 3,000 hits! So that is basically keeping him out of the HOF. And that is the gripe I have with how the Hall is viewed and voted on. How does two decent seasons from a young Dave Parker change his Hall of Fame status? As that is basically the difference because if he was playing full time like he was probably capable of doing and that allowed him to get 3,000, then he would be viewed as a HOF lock.
<< <i>Parker was a great ball player when he wasn't doing drugs. However, he was a grade A jerk. Being a big Pirate fan and growing up near Pittsburgh, I used to hang out with the other kids outside the player exit after the games. Parker said some things to the fans that I can't repeat here. Maybe it was the drugs or maybe that's his regular personality but it definitely soured my image of him. >>
this stuff doesnt matter to me. i view a player by onfield performance. i dont feel they owe me anything as a fan other then trying hard on the field.