It's 1964, What Would a Hobby Shop...
Stone193
Posts: 24,437 ✭✭✭✭✭
expect to pay for a vending case of 1964 Topps baseball?
$31.80
Not very important but I thought I would put it up there?
mike
PS: put me down for 10!
$31.80
Not very important but I thought I would put it up there?
mike
PS: put me down for 10!
Mike
0
Comments
partially alive then.
Adjusted for metals prices and printing-press
inflation, there has been a dramatic fall in the
wholesale/retail price of casegoods during the
past 40-years.
storm
I wonder what year the vending case actually started to grow in popularity? .... junk years of '86 and '87? Is it possible to believe
there was more of a product produced than 1989 Topps????
ALWAYS Looking for Chris Sabo cards!
<< <i>Wonder if Topps has any records of just how many vending cases were actually sold that year, or any other years for that matter.
I wonder what year the vending case actually started to grow in popularity? .... junk years of '86 and '87? Is it possible to believe
there was more of a product produced than 1989 Topps???? >>
Not sure.
But the only reason they would want/need them would be if one owned vending machines.
I have seen vending machines around in the 90s but not as of late.
In Murphy's catalog, he states that vending machines became outdated in the 70s - this I wouldn't know for sure.
Topps, e.g., kept making vending since they knew a lot of collectors wanted them. It's a cheaper way to get a lot of cards.
Also, hi volume card sellers in the 90s were probably breaking vending by the carload.
Except if sheets were being cut up - a stack of worthless RC's has to come from some place?
Just imagine, if someone found a 64T vending today - legit - what it would sell for?
mike
LOL jk
I'd LOVE to know it's real... course, I have no reason to belive it's not. How many of these can possibly still be laying around (legit) ???
ALWAYS Looking for Chris Sabo cards!
<< <i>expect to pay for a vending case of 1964 Topps baseball?
$31.80
Not very important but I thought I would put it up there?
mike
PS: put me down for 10! >>
Interesting that they use the phrase "per M" which is more of a paper and printing industry term.
Goes to show that the collectible value (investment?) was not yet a part of the business. They were more interested in the price per card, not how much the hot rookie would book for in a few months.
Oh to go back to the days of innocence in the card biz.
That could be the crapshoot of the century! A run of OCs and dings...
Big chance.
Heck, I bought two 83Ts that were near worthless.
mike