Oh, here's another funny one. The 1953 Iranian 1-rial piece is listed with a mintage of 3 pieces, and Krause has a note below that states "Much rarer than mintage would indicate". Ha! Rarer than THREE?
And the prices for that one start at four dollars.
<< <i>Oh, here's another funny one. The 1953 Iranian 1-rial piece is listed with a mintage of 3 pieces, and Krause has a note below that states "Much rarer than mintage would indicate". Ha! Rarer than THREE?
And the prices for that one start at four dollars. >>
Judging by how Iranian coins sell, sounds about right $4 for one with a mintage of three.
OK, here's another Krause related question, O Wise Ones:
Let us discuss the French KM939 50-centime pieces of 1962-64. The 1962 with "4 folds in collar" is obviously a good cherrypick, while the "3 folds in collar" is common.
But how to tell the difference? I see folds everywhere in the collar!? Which folds are we countin', here?
Oh... wait... izzit the ones behind her neck, over the shoulder?
Comments
Funny how Krause doesn't list it?
And the prices for that one start at four dollars.
They used to have a mintage of 3.320 million for the 1332 (1953) rial.
World Coin & PM Collector
My Coin Info Pages <> My All Experts Profile
Krause doesn't list any EA strikes for all of the minors, but they do exist for many of the years, but not all.
<< <i>Oh, here's another funny one. The 1953 Iranian 1-rial piece is listed with a mintage of 3 pieces, and Krause has a note below that states "Much rarer than mintage would indicate". Ha! Rarer than THREE?
And the prices for that one start at four dollars.
Judging by how Iranian coins sell, sounds about right $4 for one with a mintage of three.
<< <i>Check the last listings for Swiss 10 rappen. For unknown reasons the brass and nickel pieces are listed after the copper-nickel ones. >>
But this one IS copper-ni ...
Oh, wait. I see what you're sayin'. It's nickel, not cupronickel. Hm.
Another case of my not scrutinizing the Krause closely enough, I suppose.
Wonder why they struck them in different compositions like that?
<< <i>They used to have a mintage of 3.320 million for the 1332 (1953) rial. >>
So apparently they edited the mintage (or survival) total, and forgot to remove the footnote about the mintage/scarcity discrepancy?
Well, ya learn somethin' new every day. Thanks- in my Yetidom, I had almost forgotten what a font of wisdom the Darkside is.
Let us discuss the French KM939 50-centime pieces of 1962-64. The 1962 with "4 folds in collar" is obviously a good cherrypick, while the "3 folds in collar" is common.
But how to tell the difference? I see folds everywhere in the collar!? Which folds are we countin', here?
Oh... wait... izzit the ones behind her neck, over the shoulder?
<< <i>Wonder why they struck them in different compositions like that? >>
Ever hear of nickel ammo cartridges?? Maybe the Swiss were a lot smarter than Chamberlain regarding Herr Hitler.
... but I suppose the Swiss coulda seen the writing on the wall.