Yaz??
incugator
Posts: 622
Does anybody besides me think that Yaz cards are under-valued? He was the last player to win the triple crown and he is a Red Sox great. He never won a championship, but he played on a bunch of very good teams. It seems like Rose cards are sold for 2X or more than Yaz cards and I don't doubt that Rose's accomplishments are greater than Yaz's, but the triple crown is looking like quite a feat. The triple crown hasn't had to many serious challengers in the past 20 years. The only one that I can really think of is Shef in the mid 90's. Any thoughts?
-Ryan
0
Comments
I got to know Tony Armas a little when he played for the A's. When he came back to Oakland while playing for the Red Sox he said that he didn't like Boston at all and said it was difficult to get a cab and that the environment there was not good for a Latin player. Heard the same stories in print articles from Jim Rice and some of the black Celtics players.
Not sure, but on the popularity scale, Rico Petrocelli and Tony Conigliaro might have been more popular than Yaz at the time.
I was an autograph hound in my youth, and Yaz was always tough if there was a crowd but he was very nice the time or two I was able to get him when I was the only one around. I've always been a Yaz fan.
He was a great defensive player with a powerful arm.
I would say his cards are valued about right. I am betting his rookie card in PSA 9 condition would be quite expensive.
JB
His name just isn't as sexy as Clemente, Koufax or Rose.
Value is where it should be, imho.
<< <i>His name just isn't as sexy as Clemente, Koufax or Rose. >>
"Yastrzemski" is so sexy that it's almost x-rated. Okay, that sounded a bit...
<< <i>
<< <i>His name just isn't as sexy as Clemente, Koufax or Rose. >>
"Yastrzemski" is so sexy that it's almost x-rated. Okay, that sounded a bit... >>
EB
I am from Boston and am a Yaz fan; just playing the devil's advocate role on arguments I've heard in the past from Yaz detractors.
Yaz cards are priced similar (or favorably) to McCovey's, who is an HOFer with 500+ homers and also has an RC in the 1960 set, so I don't think Yaz is very undervalued.
I collect Yaz and have bought and sold many items , as far as being undervalued , I don't think so. His prices sell at or better than the other stars of the 60's and 70's. Supply and demand are an issue as there aren't any real tough cards to create high prices on the regular issues . maybe 69 topps ? 73 topps in a 9 will sell for $500 if they ever show up. there was one that sold for 440 but it was a 7 in a 9 holder. His rookie sells for 3k in a 9 which is better than most from the 60's and in sets like 71 greatest moments , his cards sell for more than stars like rose and mays. The 64 stand up is a short print which sells for more. even some of his 60's cards in 9's sell for more than others. take 68 topps for example . and there are some big money spenders out there that buy up all the oddball stuff so that stuff sells for more than other players from similar oddball sets.
Found this at a yard sale about 10 years ago for $1.00
1962 Pressman Toys Carl Yastrzemski Action Baseball Game
Still has the original price sticker from Freese's for the large sum of $2.22
I'm sure that a few of the small parts are missing and unfortunately the batting tips sheet is long since gone.
Jeff
Miscut Museum
My Mess
I know I have been waiting for a 73 PSA 9 also (a true 9, last I checked pop was 2) and $500 may only scratch the surface on that one.
Value is simply supply and demand.
Michael Jordan cards have dropped significantly in 'value' over the past 5 years, but he is still the greatest basketball player ever.
Especially with the Master Set Registries on PSA - a handful of collectors can significantly swing the demand side of the equation. A few of the Yaz collectors I know spend more time/money/resources in pre-war than chasing down a PSA 10 instead of a PSA 9 of the same card.