BOOM's Quarters, #14 in the 32-64 division is viewable in the BS&T Forum. Considering selling. H

Boom

I've finally learned to host large pix. CAN YOU IMAGINE? These were taken some time ago but still you can see the potential for upgrade.

Talk is cheap but pictures are worth 1000s of words. Many people whose opinions I respect, with absolutely no knowledge of each others' opinions ALL arrive at the very same conclusion and that is that the vast majority of these coins are undergraded. See what you think. It DOES make a difference when the 67s are viewable right beside the so-called 66s.

I've studied this series non-stop for 8 years straight and have learned many things from people I perceive to be Masters. Side by side comparisons with not only my own 67s but others out there, I now offer Proof Positive to back my and their opinions.

I may need to reshoot them as over the course of time my skills as a photographer have improved thanks to the very patient people I have asked to help me LEARN. Contrary to popular belief, there ARE collectors with good eyes for coins.

The set is viewable in it's entirety and then some. I still have others that I could add and perhaps I should lay some 66s right next to 67s of like kind.

Regards all,

BOOM

PQpeace

Why don't you think you will get a fair shake ??

They have always been fair with me.

If your coins are really good,send them in..and you will be rewarded..

If your coins are not, well
Larry

Boom

No malice intended here, I assure you, as PCGS has actually been quite good to me in the past. I have always had utmost respect for David Hall and his brainchild. What an accomplishment! He knows what PCGS means to me and how I have always felt about this organization.

With so many graders and key personnel having come and gone I don't want to be subjected to the overly tight grading that many collectors have been and still are complaining about.

I just want my coins graded according to their merits, the first time around. No more - no less.

Look at the coins posted in the BS&T Forum. Some of those 66s are every bit as nice as my own 67s, if not better.

No one is perfect. As long as human beings grade coins there will be differences of opinion. People have good days and bad days.

The 32-D certainly is unlike any PCGS 64 I've ever seen. The 35-D, 36-D, 37-D, 39-D are ALL as nice as any PCGS 67 Washington Quarter I've handled over the years and believe me, I've handled my fair share and have supplied many a fellow collector with some low pop coins that command hefty premiums. D Poole, Nye's Folly and several collectors that rank higher than I.

It's NOT about envy or anything like that. It has everything to do with the consistancy of being Professional and looked upon as #1.

Boom

I have plenty interested in portions of the set. I've taken it down for now because I believe I'll try to send the best candidates for regrade in a time or two ... or three.

Boom

I have had several solid inquiries from people I've worked with before. I am still in the contemplative mode.