When someone beats you to 100%/10.0 do you stop caring or keep building?
GeoffEighinger
Posts: 431 ✭✭
Just curious. I'm mainly speaking of the 1999 Bowman Chrome Baseball, where a couple guys have 100% and one is a perfect 10. I started building mine a few months ago and knew I wasn't gonna get to 100%/10.0 first but continued anyway. Is it more of a competition for you guys or just the satisfaction of getting it 100%/10.0 (or 100%/9.0 for vintage sets)?
0
Comments
<< <i>I always say collect for your own enjoyment. If people are collecting with the sole purpose of achieving #1 ranking status, they are collecting for the wrong reasons. It's ok to strive to be #1 as long as it's not the sole purpose for collecting. >>
I could not say it better myself. It is nice to be #1 but sometimes you can't afford it.
<< <i>I always say collect for your own enjoyment. If people are collecting with the sole purpose of achieving #1 ranking status, they are collecting for the wrong reasons. It's ok to strive to be #1 as long as it's not the sole purpose for collecting. >>
1990 leaf in (10)
1986 topps mets (10)
2008 ring kings cut signatures
any Darryl Strawberry, Dwight Gooden, Keith Hernandez cards in (10)
<< <i>I always say collect for your own enjoyment. If people are collecting with the sole purpose of achieving #1 ranking status, they are collecting for the wrong reasons. It's ok to strive to be #1 as long as it's not the sole purpose for collecting. >>
Well said.
al.
Anyway If one truly enjoys the set, so what if someone has an equal or better set. As expressed before, collect what you like, obviously, we all would prefer having the best set out there, but unfortunately, we all can't have the number one set. I'd like a Caddy but am reasonably happy with a nice Chevy, somewhat similar with our card collections.
<< <i>I always say collect for your own enjoyment. If people are collecting with the sole purpose of achieving #1 ranking status, they are collecting for the wrong reasons. It's ok to strive to be #1 as long as it's not the sole purpose for collecting.
>>
I agree with the "enjoyment" point . However, if someone is collecting a set with the number one spot in mind and it is as affordable as it is enjoyable for them why is that the "wrong" reasons? Since when did wanting to be the best or have the best start being considered wrong?
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
I agree that these shouldn't be viewed as mutually exclusive. I have some sets that I view as extremely enjoyable to have/pursue the best possible set in (whether I share top spot or not) and others that a solid grade level is sufficient even if it's lower down in the pack.
Red
Looking for 81-84 Topps Stickers in PSA 9 or better, 81 Topps Scratch offs, 83 Topps Fold outs in PSA 8 or better, 83 Fleer Stamps and 81/86 Fleer Star Stickers in PSA 9 or better.
>
<< <i>Gemint hit it on the head..I'm into the Rose Master Set and know there is no way I can compete with the deep pockets at #1. I collect for my own enjoyment. Not to go" NaaNaa I'm #1"
Red >>
you are totally missing the point. Some DO collect for their "own enjoyment" like you do and it so happens that they do have deep pockets and can afford it. How is that collecting to say "NaaNaa I'm # 1" ???????????
I guess I am asking this ....
Why is it that those who can afford to ENJOYABLY compete for a best set get picked apart by the guy who can't afford to? Why do the guys who cant afford these high grade big dollar sets think THEY are collecting for the RIGHT reasons? When the high grade guy is having the same satisfaction as the mid grade guy?
Is it ENVY that makes the mid grade guy think he is collecting the way you "should" ???
Dan
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
<< <i>
<< <i>I always say collect for your own enjoyment. If people are collecting with the sole purpose of achieving #1 ranking status, they are collecting for the wrong reasons. It's ok to strive to be #1 as long as it's not the sole purpose for collecting.
>>
I agree with the "enjoyment" point . However, if someone is collecting a set with the number one spot in mind and it is as affordable as it is enjoyable for them why is that the "wrong" reasons? Since when did wanting to be the best or have the best start being considered wrong? >>
You misunderstood what I said. I said it's ok to collect what you like and try to be #1. I only say those who collect only to have the best set and would not collect the set otherwise is the wrong reason to collect. I guess the latter case would be a strict investment portfolio and not really a collection.
1) I collect for my own enjoyment, I can't compete with deep pockets.....not picking anyone apart here
2) I do not collect to say I'm #1 refer to statement #1...still not picking anyone apart.
3) If you do collect to say " I'm #1" then that's up to you...I don't....still not picking anyone apart
If you can afford to buy high grade, high dollar cards then that's great. To be honest I don't care why or who collects what and for whatever reasons.
Looking for 81-84 Topps Stickers in PSA 9 or better, 81 Topps Scratch offs, 83 Topps Fold outs in PSA 8 or better, 83 Fleer Stamps and 81/86 Fleer Star Stickers in PSA 9 or better.
>
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
By the way I'm looking for some 78 Reds to finish up my set. Do you have any available
Looking for 81-84 Topps Stickers in PSA 9 or better, 81 Topps Scratch offs, 83 Topps Fold outs in PSA 8 or better, 83 Fleer Stamps and 81/86 Fleer Star Stickers in PSA 9 or better.
>