OPINION: I see that the leaders in the WS Trading contest are playing bullion...
saintguru
Posts: 7,724 ✭✭✭
Now I know that this is not against the rules...but do you think that it was in the "spirit of the contest" when it was initiated?
Wasn't this really supposed to be a numismatic challenge? Is buying 2000 Eagles (or whatever) what this is about? Or was it meant to be a coin picking competition?
I'd be interested in opinions.
Wasn't this really supposed to be a numismatic challenge? Is buying 2000 Eagles (or whatever) what this is about? Or was it meant to be a coin picking competition?
I'd be interested in opinions.
0
Comments
Russ, NCNE
Russ, NCNE
of course
anything and anyway to make a buck ...............
Knowledge is the enemy of fear
<< <i>Now I know that this is not against the rules...but do you think that it was in the "spirit of the contest" when it was initiated? >>
Not in the spirit of the contest, as I've mentioned elsewhere, but there's $10000 on the line. PCGS could make it more difficult to play bullion if they wanted to by updating the values at unpredictable times.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
I suppose if the 3 cent coins were winning, someone would complain they are not a current denomination used in circulation. It seems to me a childish waste of time game anyway, and the prize is no big deal. Go back to playing chess.
<< <i>and the prize is no big deal. >>
No big deal? If I win I could get off welfare for a few months.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>..but do you think that it was in the "spirit of the contest" when it was initiated? >>
I am not a participant in and know virtually nothing about the contest.
However, I am guessing that some entrants are making $ by acquiring multiples of various coins that they could not necessarily acquire in that time frame in real life?
I also suspect that they and/or others are profiting from scanning the PCGS price guide and finding, then buying certain coins because the listed prices are way too low/unrealistic. That would be another situation by which buyers would make $ through a means they could not accomplish in the real world.
As an example of just one other flaw in the contest as set up, I'm also guessing that contestants can sell (even) large positions in a given coin, with no negative impact on the sales price? (Edited to add: Likewise, I imagine that quantities of coins can be bought with no upward price pressure). Again, it doesn't always work that way in the real world.
So, let's face it, the contest might be fun, challenging and something to brag about and/or complain about, but it has little to do with reality. I expect that those who are doing particularly well will disagree, but that others who aren't near the top, will agree with my "reality" comment.
I agree. Of course, I did not agree with this statement when I was ranked #3. I jumped into the top ten by buying all of the Dahlonega and Charlotte $5's which were unrealistically priced and complaining about it on the forum. Since then, while my portfolio value has been stable to slightly upward, my ranking has dropped like a rock.
Sorry Russ, I'll send your June payment early. Actually, you know my big mouth. I have no idea what the prize(s) are.
But I think bullion should not have been an option. Only coins.