holy crow! nice coin! can't see it by the picture, but I can tell, by the way cents is spelled out, that this is a reeded edge! coin (the finest '36??) or is there a better one?
Coins such as this [and the Pittman 1838 as well], make you realize that the Philadelphia Mint knew exactly how to make a proof in the 1830's ..... and casts a disparaging eye on many coins certified as such....
I don't get it. Did the scratches and hairlines keep this coin out of a TPG holder? Certainly such an expensive coin would bring more money in a holder.
I collect Capped Bust series by variety in PCGS AU/MS grades.
<< <i>I don't get it. Did the scratches and hairlines keep this coin out of a TPG holder? Certainly such an expensive coin would bring more money in a holder. >>
I believe Stack's usually deals in raw coins.
“When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.” — Benjamin Franklin
My icon IS my coin. It is a gem 1949 FBL Franklin.
<< <i>I don't get it. Did the scratches and hairlines keep this coin out of a TPG holder? Certainly such an expensive coin would bring more money in a holder. >>
I don't agree with this Mozin. I think that anyone in the market for this coin doesn't give a flying rats a$$ what a plastic company thinks--- you only buy a coin like this if you know what you are doing, and a plastic company's opinion means little with this type of coin.
Always took candy from strangers Didn't wanna get me no trade Never want to be like papa Working for the boss every night and day --"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
<< <i>I don't get it. Did the scratches and hairlines keep this coin out of a TPG holder? Certainly such an expensive coin would bring more money in a holder. >>
The marks wouldn't keep it out of a holder, only would keep it below gem status. Any 19th century proof graded below 65 can show some evidence of cleaning or mishandling, and 60-62 can be densely hairlined. I'd go with the 'Stacks don't need no stinkin TPG' line of thought.
<< <i>I don't get it. Did the scratches and hairlines keep this coin out of a TPG holder? Certainly such an expensive coin would bring more money in a holder. >>
The marks wouldn't keep it out of a holder, only would keep it below gem status. Any 19th century proof graded below 65 can show some evidence of cleaning or mishandling, and 60-62 can be densely hairlined. I'd go with the 'Stacks don't need no stinkin TPG' line of thought. >>
<< <i>I don't get it. Did the scratches and hairlines keep this coin out of a TPG holder? Certainly such an expensive coin would bring more money in a holder. >>
I don't agree with this Mozin. I think that anyone in the market for this coin doesn't give a flying rats a$$ what a plastic company thinks--- you only buy a coin like this if you know what you are doing, and a plastic company's opinion means little with this type of coin. >>
I consulted Steve Herrman's latest AUCTION & MAIL BID PRICES for the 1836 RE Busties. Of the top 30 highest graded coins sold in grades AU53 and better, only two were sold raw. I stand by my original suggestion that the Stack's coin in this thread might well be a scratched & hairlined BB coin.
I collect Capped Bust series by variety in PCGS AU/MS grades.
<< <i>I don't get it. Did the scratches and hairlines keep this coin out of a TPG holder? Certainly such an expensive coin would bring more money in a holder. >>
I don't agree with this Mozin. I think that anyone in the market for this coin doesn't give a flying rats a$$ what a plastic company thinks--- you only buy a coin like this if you know what you are doing, and a plastic company's opinion means little with this type of coin. >>
I consulted Steve Herrman's latest AUCTION & MAIL BID PRICES for the 1836 RE Busties. Of the top 30 highest graded coins sold in grades AU53 and better, only two were sold raw. I stand by my original suggestion that the Stack's coin in this thread might well be a scratched & hairlined BB coin. >>
I would think that anyone spending serious dollars on this coin would want to see it first, or have someone they trust see it- not just look at a pic. And once it is seen, anyone in the market for this coin should be able to see what they are buying. Once seen, a coin like this should sell on its own merits. If the coin was going to be bought sight unseen (very very foolish), then they might want another opinion (like a TPG)
<< <i>I would think that anyone spending serious dollars on this coin would want to see it first, or have someone they trust see it- not just look at a pic. >>
I'm in the ER corner on this one. Something just doesn't seem or look right to me on this coin.
I am the last person to claim any expertise on this series but if it were an Ike, I would expect PCGS to BB it inspite of the stunning detail that screams "authentic" bust proof. The toning just doesn't seem right to me in color, pattern or lack of transparency (as judged by the photo). But, Oh what a pretty sight it is!
For serious money, however, please provide a serious provinance..... please! I'd so like to be wrong. Rob
Modern dollars are like children - before you know it they'll be all grown up.....
the color is accurate to the picture. however, looking at the coin dead on, it is dark in appearance. the color is seen when held in a light and viewed at an angle. i have seen this kind of toning on other proofs and some business strikes.
Raw is good at Stacks. Lots of buyers with lots of money, lots that know how to grade and lots that dont. In a good market, that spells big money at auction, that is why many dealers crack out tweener coins and let avarice kick in.
you can buy AT coins in PCGS and NGC holders from any of the auction houses. Buy an AT coin not in a holder and likely it won't get holdered. Buy an NT coin without a holder and there is always a chance it will be body bagged as AT. Buy a raw coin at Stacks and even if you know what you're doing, there's a risk it won't be holdered for whatever reason, unless of course, this is no matter to you. For some, it doesn't matter.
I would also like to add that Stack's has made errors in determining what is proof or not proof (I am not referring to this particular coin) and they have even made errors on certain coins where they said that the 'lintmark' was a pedigree marker when indeed the same exact 'lintmark' could be seen on all the coins minted with that particular die. Personally, unless I had an eyepiece, examined the coin myself, and knew exactly what I was doing, I wouldn't purchase anything from Stacks.
<< <i>Coins such as this [and the Pittman 1838 as well], make you realize that the Philadelphia Mint knew exactly how to make a proof in the 1830's ..... and casts a disparaging eye on many coins certified as such.... >>
That's what I was thinking.
That coin is a monster and would have no problem getting into a 3rd party holder.
The whole Northern Bay Collection is a fresh old time collection. The fact that it's raw will not hold down the prices.
"you can buy AT coins in PCGS and NGC holders from any of the auction houses. Buy an AT coin not in a holder and likely it won't get holdered. Buy an NT coin without a holder and there is always a chance it will be body bagged as AT. Buy a raw coin at Stacks and even if you know what you're doing, there's a risk it won't be holdered for whatever reason, unless of course, this is no matter to you. For some, it doesn't matter.
I would also like to add that Stack's has made errors in determining what is proof or not proof (I am not referring to this particular coin) and they have even made errors on certain coins where they said that the 'lintmark' was a pedigree marker when indeed the same exact 'lintmark' could be seen on all the coins minted with that particular die. Personally, unless I had an eyepiece, examined the coin myself, and knew exactly what I was doing, I wouldn't purchase anything from Stacks."
Thank you Mike for expressing my thoughts on this Stacks' issue.
I collect Capped Bust series by variety in PCGS AU/MS grades.
Comments
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
Tom
<< <i>I don't get it. Did the scratches and hairlines keep this coin out of a TPG holder? Certainly such an expensive coin would bring more money in a holder. >>
I believe Stack's usually deals in raw coins.
My icon IS my coin. It is a gem 1949 FBL Franklin.
<< <i>I don't get it. Did the scratches and hairlines keep this coin out of a TPG holder? Certainly such an expensive coin would bring more money in a holder. >>
I don't agree with this Mozin. I think that anyone in the market for this coin doesn't give a flying rats a$$ what a plastic company thinks--- you only buy a coin like this if you know what you are doing, and a plastic company's opinion means little with this type of coin.
<< <i>Holy Moses, what a strike! It looks like a high-end proof to me. Clearly a reeded edge. Is that coin real? Is it the finest known?
Tom[/q
It's hard to get used to seeing a reeded-edge half that is well-struck. Wow!
Didn't wanna get me no trade
Never want to be like papa
Working for the boss every night and day
--"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
<< <i>I don't get it. Did the scratches and hairlines keep this coin out of a TPG holder? Certainly such an expensive coin would bring more money in a holder. >>
The marks wouldn't keep it out of a holder, only would keep it below gem status. Any 19th century proof graded below 65 can show some evidence of cleaning or mishandling, and 60-62 can be densely hairlined. I'd go with the 'Stacks don't need no stinkin TPG' line of thought.
<< <i>
<< <i>I don't get it. Did the scratches and hairlines keep this coin out of a TPG holder? Certainly such an expensive coin would bring more money in a holder. >>
The marks wouldn't keep it out of a holder, only would keep it below gem status. Any 19th century proof graded below 65 can show some evidence of cleaning or mishandling, and 60-62 can be densely hairlined. I'd go with the 'Stacks don't need no stinkin TPG' line of thought. >>
Bingo!
<< <i>
<< <i>I don't get it. Did the scratches and hairlines keep this coin out of a TPG holder? Certainly such an expensive coin would bring more money in a holder. >>
I don't agree with this Mozin. I think that anyone in the market for this coin doesn't give a flying rats a$$ what a plastic company thinks--- you only buy a coin like this if you know what you are doing, and a plastic company's opinion means little with this type of coin. >>
I consulted Steve Herrman's latest AUCTION & MAIL BID PRICES for the 1836 RE Busties. Of the top 30 highest graded coins sold in grades AU53 and better, only two were sold raw. I stand by my original suggestion that the Stack's coin in this thread might well be a scratched & hairlined BB coin.
er,
what is wrong with it to you? i noticed what you said.
can you explain a bit more? maybe you do not like the
"look" of the coin.
<< <i>it looks very nice to say the least.
er,
what is wrong with it to you? i noticed what you said.
can you explain a bit more? maybe you do not like the
"look" of the coin. >>
First impression.
I looked again, still don't like it. Looks like painted on. Hey, just me. People like it, it's ok with me. Even if I'm rich, I would not buy it.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>I don't get it. Did the scratches and hairlines keep this coin out of a TPG holder? Certainly such an expensive coin would bring more money in a holder. >>
I don't agree with this Mozin. I think that anyone in the market for this coin doesn't give a flying rats a$$ what a plastic company thinks--- you only buy a coin like this if you know what you are doing, and a plastic company's opinion means little with this type of coin. >>
I consulted Steve Herrman's latest AUCTION & MAIL BID PRICES for the 1836 RE Busties. Of the top 30 highest graded coins sold in grades AU53 and better, only two were sold raw. I stand by my original suggestion that the Stack's coin in this thread might well be a scratched & hairlined BB coin. >>
I would think that anyone spending serious dollars on this coin would want to see it first, or have someone they trust see it- not just look at a pic. And once it is seen, anyone in the market for this coin should be able to see what they are buying. Once seen, a coin like this should sell on its own merits. If the coin was going to be bought sight unseen (very very foolish), then they might want another opinion (like a TPG)
<< <i>I think Good Ol' Tom will offer you $150 for it. >>
Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
<< <i>I would think that anyone spending serious dollars on this coin would want to see it first, or have someone they trust see it- not just look at a pic. >>
I'm in the ER corner on this one. Something just doesn't seem or look right to me on this coin.
For serious money, however, please provide a serious provinance..... please! I'd so like to be wrong. Rob
Questions about Ikes? Go to The IKE GROUP WEB SITE
siliconvalleycoins.com
<< <i>I think Good Ol' Tom will offer you $150 for it. >>
he might offer me a little more. i was thinking $350 max
Somebody should dip that thing.
<< <i>Coins such as this [and the Pittman 1838 as well], make you realize that the Philadelphia Mint knew exactly how to make a proof in the 1830's ..... and casts a disparaging eye on many coins certified as such.... >>
That's what I was thinking.
That coin is a monster and would have no problem getting into a 3rd party holder.
The whole Northern Bay Collection is a fresh old time collection. The fact that it's raw will not hold down the prices.
MikeKing said,
"you can buy AT coins in PCGS and NGC holders from any of the auction houses. Buy an AT coin not in a holder and likely it won't get holdered. Buy an NT coin without a holder and there is always a chance it will be body bagged as AT. Buy a raw coin at Stacks and even if you know what you're doing, there's a risk it won't be holdered for whatever reason, unless of course, this is no matter to you. For some, it doesn't matter.
I would also like to add that Stack's has made errors in determining what is proof or not proof (I am not referring to this particular coin) and they have even made errors on certain coins where they said that the 'lintmark' was a pedigree marker when indeed the same exact 'lintmark' could be seen on all the coins minted with that particular die. Personally, unless I had an eyepiece, examined the coin myself, and knew exactly what I was doing, I wouldn't purchase anything from Stacks."
Thank you Mike for expressing my thoughts on this Stacks' issue.
I love it!