Home U.S. Coin Forum

Have the counterfeit VAMs increased in price?

When I was home for lunch today, Fey's newsletter was waiting in the mailbox. I was looking at his price sheet, particularly the micro O's and his price guide seems to indicate the counterfeits are moving up in price. Of course, I haven't had time to compare other sources and prior listings. Has anyone else seen this? I may have to scout around more for these coins if they're bringing those kinds of prices.
Jeff

image

Semper ubi sub ubi

Comments

  • RampageRampage Posts: 9,474 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I have not seen any for sale in quite some time. What kind of prices is he talking about? I could use one additional 1900-O micro-O, but other than that, I am all set. image
  • jdsinvajdsinva Posts: 1,508
    That's why I was wondering, because I don't recall seeing any for sale either and the prices listed looked like the slab prices just before PCGS quit slabbing them.
    Jeff

    image

    Semper ubi sub ubi
  • Glad to hear it - - I still have plenty of them
  • CoxeCoxe Posts: 11,139
    Yes, a lot of VAMs have gone up, particularly them --- except the 02-o micro o in fine. I have one in that grade. It's in a PCGS holder though so I don't take the Fey sheet price as seriously for that one.
    Select Rarities -- DMPLs and VAMs
    NSDR - Life Member
    SSDC - Life Member
    ANA - Pay As I Go Member
  • jdsinvajdsinva Posts: 1,508
    I have the 96-O and the 1900-O but not the 1902-O. As you can see I can't speak from experience but if one were to rank the three micro Os, which would be scarcest?
    Jeff

    image

    Semper ubi sub ubi
  • CoxeCoxe Posts: 11,139


    << <i>I have the 96-O and the 1900-O but not the 1902-O. As you can see I can't speak from experience but if one were to rank the three micro Os, which would be scarcest? >>



    Judging by a PCGS pop report prior to their elimination there (July 2005 is my handy one), 1900-o (pop 30) and 1902-o (pop 38) are too close to be statistically differentiated. 1896-o had a pop of 66, four in MS remarkably (highest MS64). The other two dates had 3 and 4 only, respectively, above VF.
    Select Rarities -- DMPLs and VAMs
    NSDR - Life Member
    SSDC - Life Member
    ANA - Pay As I Go Member
  • jdsinvajdsinva Posts: 1,508
    Thanks, that's some good info to keep tucked away!
    Jeff

    image

    Semper ubi sub ubi
  • RampageRampage Posts: 9,474 ✭✭✭✭✭
    All my micro-Os are VG and less, but I still like them. image I could not imagine what an MS64 would look like.
  • jdsinvajdsinva Posts: 1,508
    My 96-O is a VG. This 1900-O I have easily has AU luster but looks like XF wear.
    Jeff

    image

    Semper ubi sub ubi
  • CoxeCoxe Posts: 11,139
    Never saw an MS one either.

    Here's a sobering flashback ----> 1900-O VAM-5 VF Sold 7 Years Ago

    Note that the VAM Keys book had been out for 3 years at this point, the coin was attributed, and they were selling for 100 to 200 times common at the time. Some of us noticed it, after it was too late.
    Select Rarities -- DMPLs and VAMs
    NSDR - Life Member
    SSDC - Life Member
    ANA - Pay As I Go Member
  • DennisHDennisH Posts: 13,995 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Coxe:

    What numbers are you looking at? I also have a copy of the July '05 PCGS Pop Report. It shows no Mint State coins of any of the counterfeit Micro-O dates ('96, '00, '02). Total pop on the '96 was 27; the highest was two XF45s.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • jdsinvajdsinva Posts: 1,508
    Whoa, an $11 attributed 1900-O micro O, unbelievable!
    Jeff

    image

    Semper ubi sub ubi
  • DennisHDennisH Posts: 13,995 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The counterfeit dates rarely come up for sale anymore, and prices are very weak compared to their previous days when they were part of the "With Varieties" Registry set at PCGS.

    Here are prices from the VAMview archives. Keep in mind that PCGS pulled the plug on the three counterfeit dates in mid-2005. The three ANACS coins whose grades are shown as "none" are for recently holdered coins; ANACS did not state a grade at all, and put "questionable authenticity" on the holder.

    date --VAM--grade--service--date sold--where--price
    1896-O 4 40 PCGS Nov-04 H $2,990
    1896-O 4 35 PCGS Apr-05 E $3,905
    1896-O 4 20 raw Apr-05 E $431
    1896-O 4 12 ANACS Aug-05 E $160
    1896-O 4 8 ANACS Dec-05 E $350
    1896-O 4 none ANACS Dec-05 E $108
    1896-O 4 none ANACS Dec-05 E $103

    1900-O 5 35 PCGS Nov-04 E $2,025
    1900-O 5 20 PCGS Apr-05 E $825
    1900-O 5 20 SEGS Apr-05 E $204
    1900-O 5 12 PCGS Apr-05 E $906
    1900-O 5 8 raw Mar-06 E $138
    1900-O 5 8 raw Nov-04 E $114
    1900-O 5 8 raw Sep-04 E $108
    1900-O 5 3 raw Sep-05 PP $195
    1900-O 5 none ANACS Dec-05 E $112

    1902-O 3 55 ANACS Feb-05 PP $11,000
    1902-O 3 40 ANACS Apr-05 PP $4,500
    1902-O 3 35 PCGS Nov-05 E $1,826
    1902-O 3 30 PCGS Jan-05 S $5,100
    1902-O 3 30 raw Apr-05 E $660
    1902-O 3 25 PCGS Apr-05 E $3,251
    1902-O 3 25 PCGS Jun-05 E $1,703
    1902-O 3 20 PCGS Nov-04 H $2,070
    1902-O 3 15 raw Apr-05 E $921
    1902-O 3 15 PCGS Mar-05 E $400
    1902-O 3 15 raw Oct-05 E $179
    1902-O 3 12 PCGS Apr-05 E $1,515
    1902-O 3 10 PCGS Apr-05 E $1,365
    1902-O 3 10 raw Aug-05 E $177
    1902-O 3 10 raw Jul-05 E $158
    1902-O 3 8 PCGS Jan-05 E $1,275
    1902-O 3 8 raw Feb-05 E $450
    1902-O 3 8 raw Aug-05 E $97
    1902-O 3 6 PCGS Apr-05 PP $900
    1902-O 3 6 PCGS Oct-05 E $338
    1902-O 3 4 ANACS Sep-05 E $169
    1902-O 3 none ANACS Dec-05 E $142
    When in doubt, don't.
  • CoxeCoxe Posts: 11,139


    << <i>Coxe:

    What numbers are you looking at? I also have a copy of the July '05 PCGS Pop Report. It shows no Mint State coins of any of the counterfeit Micro-O dates ('96, '00, '02). Total pop on the '96 was 27; the highest was two XF45s. >>



    Thanks for the correction. With my eyesight, I have no responsible business doing VAMs. I ended up reading the 99-o line, not the 96-o one. 96-o micro o had 27 total, 8 above VF but no AU and no MS. They are all rare and if you see a PCGS VF or above it won't be aroubd for long.

    I only have 2 of these counterfeits: 1896-o ANACS VF35 and 1902-o PCGS F12.
    Select Rarities -- DMPLs and VAMs
    NSDR - Life Member
    SSDC - Life Member
    ANA - Pay As I Go Member
  • CoxeCoxe Posts: 11,139


    << <i>Whoa, an $11 attributed 1900-O micro O, unbelievable! >>



    And that is with the juice (10% at the time I think, but with a minimum) and was still actually cheaper than the common. Common certified G and VG were selling for more. I have wondered who got that coin. The winner was the ONLY bidder too!
    Select Rarities -- DMPLs and VAMs
    NSDR - Life Member
    SSDC - Life Member
    ANA - Pay As I Go Member
  • jdsinvajdsinva Posts: 1,508
    I cherried my 96-O off of eBay for $9.99 plus $3 S&H back 5 or so years ago (has it been that long already?). The 1900-O I won a couple of months ago and maybe paid like $25 for it off of eBay. Now if I can find an 1902-O for the trifecta! image
    Jeff

    image

    Semper ubi sub ubi
  • RampageRampage Posts: 9,474 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I cherried my 96-O off of eBay for $9.99 plus $3 S&H back 5 or so years ago (has it been that long already?). The 1900-O I won a couple of months ago and maybe paid like $25 for it off of eBay. Now if I can find an 1902-O for the trifecta! image >>



    Jeff, is that the one you posted a link to a while back? You saw the diagnostics of the coin I had posted that led you to that coin? Is that the same one? If it is, I accept tips. image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file