Way cool half-dime find this evening - actually rather unbelievable.
LanLord
Posts: 11,714 ✭✭✭✭✭
This evening, as I was reviewing my type album (A Library of Coins 2 album type set - I was looking at the first album).
This is an album which I had purchased used from a coin dealer that I buy from quite often, I have had it for 2 years or so.
I noticed that the binding on it never really layed properly as I was looking through it, well, finally tonight, the binding flexed
in one direction, and out of the bottom of the binding rolled a half dime (one that wasn't part of my collection).
Apparently, some years ago, the person that owned the album must not have noticed that a half dime became lodged
in between the paper and the cardboard of the second page (or maybe did notice, but couldn't do anything about it).
Anyway tonight it worked it's way free, and out dropped a 1858 seated half dime in somewhere between F15 and VF20 condition.
Nothing too special other than the fact that it was totally free to me. I was hoping it would be something way cool like an unknown
second specimin of the 1870-S half dime, but no, just a 1858 coin.
Pretty cool none the less!
This is an album which I had purchased used from a coin dealer that I buy from quite often, I have had it for 2 years or so.
I noticed that the binding on it never really layed properly as I was looking through it, well, finally tonight, the binding flexed
in one direction, and out of the bottom of the binding rolled a half dime (one that wasn't part of my collection).
Apparently, some years ago, the person that owned the album must not have noticed that a half dime became lodged
in between the paper and the cardboard of the second page (or maybe did notice, but couldn't do anything about it).
Anyway tonight it worked it's way free, and out dropped a 1858 seated half dime in somewhere between F15 and VF20 condition.
Nothing too special other than the fact that it was totally free to me. I was hoping it would be something way cool like an unknown
second specimin of the 1870-S half dime, but no, just a 1858 coin.
Pretty cool none the less!
0
Comments
Neat find anyway.
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member
Oscar Wilde
Collect for the love of the hobby, the beauty of the coins, and enjoy the ride.
Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society.
<< <i>Every coin is potentially special, even common dates and lower grades. Have you looked for overdates (including over inverted date), doubled digits? This date also has a short pole and recut date varieties. Neat find anyway. >>
Interesting, if I compare the half dime I found to the image in the book by Al Blyth, the "short pole" variety, I believe it may be this one. What it appears to be is that the pole whish should be suspending the liberty hat is missing from just below the extended finger to where the hat is sitting, appearing to be suspended in mid-air.
Anyone an expert in half dimes? Would that be an accurate description of the short pole?
Thanks!
Very cool find Tom. You oughta go through that book with a fine tooth comb and see what else is hiding in there
Good find !!!!
Hell, I don't need to exercise.....I get enough just pushing my luck.
What kind of album tone do you get when you store your coins in the album this way?
Not sure how good the images are.
Here are the:
Obverse
Reverse
Pole: is this a short pole?
Date
That might rule out the short pole variety, anyone with expertise in that one have any information to chime in?
1858 is indeed an interesting year for the half dimes, with many unusual and interesting varieties. Without seeing the coin, and being able to study both the obverse and reverse (and perhaps the 'third side' - the edge) it is impossible to attribute your coin to a specific die marriage. I would caution any collector who attempts to attribute their coins by variety, or die marriage, to look at both sides of the coin before rendering a decision. Many new discoveries have gone unnoticed because of 'lazy' attribution techhniques, where the collector looks only at one diagnostic point, or just one side of the coin.
The so-called "Short Pole" 1858 half dime is designated as the Valentine V5, as the die marriage was known to Valentine, but perhaps not the specific attribute of the 'short pole'. Valentine describes the V5 as:
"Obv: Medium open low date. The shield points to left of 1, skirt-pendant over right center of 5. Die cracks through first three and last three stars.
Rev: Medium lettering."
Valentine's typical ambiguous verbal descriptions would allow many 1858 half dimes, from different die marriages, to meet the description. Al Blythe, in his "The Complete Guide to Liberty Seated Half Dimes" provides a more detailed description where he adds:
"Lapping of the obverse die caused Ms. Liberty to be holding a short pole with the appearance of her index finger suspending the hat at the finger tip."
In my own notes, in my half dime database, I have the following diagnostic information:
OBV: SL-11. Obverse die heavily lapped, reducing detail and virtually eliminating pole above Miss Liberty's hand; hence the "Short Pole" sobriquet. Diagnostic DC *8 -*13. REV: M1 partially filled at center and left side.
The designation "SL-11" refers to the shield line - a method to distinguish different obverse dies by sighting along the right side of the upright of the 1 in the date, projecting this line up to the shield above, and determining which of the vertical shield lines (pales) it intersects. The shield lines are consecutively numbered 1-12 from left to right. For the V5 Short Pole variety, the right side of the upright of the 1 intersects with the shield line 11.
As the cause of the "short pole" designation was severe die lapping, and such lapping was common on half dimes of this era, many different 'varieties' can exhibit the same missing pole. There are similar 'short pole' varieties for other half dimes of this period, including 1858-O.
Al Blythe lists the 1858 V5 Short Pole variety as R3, or relatively common. In the absence of concrete census population data, we are left to guess the relative rarity of this and other varieties, but my own experience would tend to concur with Mr. Blythe's assessment. An interesting coin, and well worth your purchase price.
Don't find better deals than that one eh?