Home U.S. Coin Forum

How come this custom never caught on on this side of the pond?


In UK numismatic listings I often see coins described as 'Good very fine', such as this guy on Ebay:



<< <i>United States Colonial, New York, Talbot Allum & Lee Cent 1795. Female figure holding Liberty Cap. Reverse shows ship sailing right.

Good very fine condition, with slight trace of lustre around figure >>



It certainly does sound refined, doesn't it?



Comments

  • NicNic Posts: 3,386 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I almost want to buy it, just based on the description. Fond memories of more simple times ....... K
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,417 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Is it better than "Bad Very Fine?"
    All glory is fleeting.
  • CladiatorCladiator Posts: 18,059 ✭✭✭✭✭
    How about mediocre very fine?
  • ColonialCoinUnionColonialCoinUnion Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Female figure holding Liberty Cap. Reverse shows ship sailing right. >>



    Plus I bet he pronounces it as 'figger', instead of figure.
  • ColonialCoinUnionColonialCoinUnion Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭


    << <i>How about mediocre very fine? >>



    After examining this coin carefully, I see it as 'Very fine very fine', shot 'Extremely fine very fine'.
  • CladiatorCladiator Posts: 18,059 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I guefs you could achieve the fame thing, with perhaps a bit lefs confufion to the general population, by using a + or - fymbol. I've feen this type of grade labeling on feveral dealers webfites.

    ex; This coin grades XF+
  • BarryBarry Posts: 10,100 ✭✭✭
    How about jolly good, very fine?
  • LongacreLongacre Posts: 16,717 ✭✭✭


    << <i>How about jolly good, very fine? >>



    image
    Always took candy from strangers
    Didn't wanna get me no trade
    Never want to be like papa
    Working for the boss every night and day
    --"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
  • RegulatedRegulated Posts: 2,992 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like it. But I also like it when colour is spelt with the letter U.

    image

    What is now proved was once only imagined. - William Blake
  • I like the "slight trace of lustre around figure" - what about the large amount of wear on the figure and ship? Or how about "natural toning helps offset the slight traces of lustre around woman and ship". I just love the way things are described - accentuate the positive, ignore the negative"!!!
    TheZooKrew
    Morgan, modern sets, circulated Kennedys, and Wisconsin error leaf quarter Collector
    First (and only - so far) Official "You Suck" Award from Russ 2/9/07
  • ColonialCoinUnionColonialCoinUnion Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I like the "slight trace of lustre around figure" - what about the large amount of wear on the figure and ship? Or how about "natural toning helps offset the slight traces of lustre around woman and ship". I just love the way things are described - accentuate the positive, ignore the negative"!!! >>



    I think the fact that he graded it Good very fine suggests that there is some wear present. I'd also be willing to bet that this coin would slab as AU50 or better by at least one of the top tier services.
  • XpipedreamRXpipedreamR Posts: 8,059 ✭✭
    How come this custom never caught on on this side of the pond?





    Neither did calling it "the pond," I think image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file