How come this custom never caught on on this side of the pond?
ColonialCoinUnion
Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭
In UK numismatic listings I often see coins described as 'Good very fine', such as this guy on Ebay:
<< <i>United States Colonial, New York, Talbot Allum & Lee Cent 1795. Female figure holding Liberty Cap. Reverse shows ship sailing right.
Good very fine condition, with slight trace of lustre around figure >>
It certainly does sound refined, doesn't it?
0
Comments
My 1866 Philly Mint Set
<< <i>Female figure holding Liberty Cap. Reverse shows ship sailing right. >>
Plus I bet he pronounces it as 'figger', instead of figure.
<< <i>How about mediocre very fine? >>
After examining this coin carefully, I see it as 'Very fine very fine', shot 'Extremely fine very fine'.
ex; This coin grades XF+
<< <i>How about jolly good, very fine? >>
Didn't wanna get me no trade
Never want to be like papa
Working for the boss every night and day
--"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
What is now proved was once only imagined. - William Blake
Morgan, modern sets, circulated Kennedys, and Wisconsin error leaf quarter Collector
First (and only - so far) Official "You Suck" Award from Russ 2/9/07
<< <i>I like the "slight trace of lustre around figure" - what about the large amount of wear on the figure and ship? Or how about "natural toning helps offset the slight traces of lustre around woman and ship". I just love the way things are described - accentuate the positive, ignore the negative"!!! >>
I think the fact that he graded it Good very fine suggests that there is some wear present. I'd also be willing to bet that this coin would slab as AU50 or better by at least one of the top tier services.
Neither did calling it "the pond," I think