To much white showing on the border to make me buy it. For 10's(Gemmint) I expect perfection to the naked eye.
Collecting; Mark Mulder rookies Chipper Jones rookies Orlando Cabrera rookies Lawrence Taylor Sam Huff Lavar Arrington NY Giants NY Yankees NJ Nets NJ Devils 1950s-1960s Topps NY Giants Team cards
Not to defend them but does it not fit the PSA 10 standards?
A PSA Gem Mint 10 card is a virtually perfect card. Attributes include four perfectly sharp corners, sharp focus and full original gloss. A PSA Gem Mint 10 card must be free of staining of any kind, but an allowance may be made for a slight printing imperfection, if it doesn't impair the overall appeal of the card. The image must be centered on the card within a tolerance not to exceed approximately 55/45 to 60/40 percent on the front, and 75/25 percent on the reverse.
pandrews, I'll give you that one. Doesnt look all that great either although the design is odd and the scan is a little fuzzy. Can you resize it to be the same as the Clark? I'd be interested in seeing the difference if there is one.
<< <i>I would hope that a 10 would have at least decent enough centering that the naked eye wouldnt be able to tell the difference.
Edited: Thursday May 11, 2006 at 8:36 PM by Southerncards >>
didnt you just say something to someone about a wrong word? why did you edit out your "haqe" word? how did you type "haqe" instead of "have"? the q and v arent even close to each other on the keyboard..
My comment was not a smart ass one, rather it was a humerous play on words. If you were able to pull off that trick before I corrected the typo, I'd give you kudos.
Pa-I think ya put up my alomar! Atleast I had one of those arrive in the past week. Centering was eh on it, but for .99 cents I couldn't really complain.
Collecting; Mark Mulder rookies Chipper Jones rookies Orlando Cabrera rookies Lawrence Taylor Sam Huff Lavar Arrington NY Giants NY Yankees NJ Nets NJ Devils 1950s-1960s Topps NY Giants Team cards
^^Not really for 99 cents(Not bad, cheaper than the shipping on a submission). I know to purchase for the card and not the holder but besides being a little oc the card is perfect. Had it been closer to being centered it would've been graded Pristine imho.
Collecting; Mark Mulder rookies Chipper Jones rookies Orlando Cabrera rookies Lawrence Taylor Sam Huff Lavar Arrington NY Giants NY Yankees NJ Nets NJ Devils 1950s-1960s Topps NY Giants Team cards
Face it, a 10 should have no issues to the naked eye. This card is obviously not centered well. One needs to look only at the seller of the card and see why it got a grade of 10.
<< <i>Face it, a 10 should have no issues to the naked eye. This card is obviously not centered well. One needs to look only at the seller of the card and see why it got a grade of 10. >>
You're correct in theory but wrong in reality. Read PSA's definition for GEM MINT 10.
Comments
Mark Mulder rookies
Chipper Jones rookies
Orlando Cabrera rookies
Lawrence Taylor
Sam Huff
Lavar Arrington
NY Giants
NY Yankees
NJ Nets
NJ Devils
1950s-1960s Topps NY Giants Team cards
Looking for Topps rookies as well.
References:
GregM13
VintageJeff
A PSA Gem Mint 10 card is a virtually perfect card. Attributes include four perfectly sharp corners, sharp focus and full original gloss. A PSA Gem Mint 10 card must be free of staining of any kind, but an allowance may be made for a slight printing imperfection, if it doesn't impair the overall appeal of the card. The image must be centered on the card within a tolerance not to exceed approximately 55/45 to 60/40 percent on the front, and 75/25 percent on the reverse.
<< <i>It is definetly off-center based on the baseballs on the boarders, but for a PSA 10 the eye appeal is not there. >>
It meets criteria.
<< <i>I would hope that a 10 would haqe at least decent enough centering that the naked eye wouldnt be able to tell the difference. >>
<< <i>I would hope that a 10 would have at least decent enough centering that the naked eye wouldnt be able to tell the difference.
Edited: Thursday May 11, 2006 at 8:36 PM by Southerncards
>>
didnt you just say something to someone about a wrong word? why did you edit out your "haqe" word? how did you type "haqe" instead of "have"? the q and v arent even close to each other on the keyboard..
you should arrest yourself..
geez
<< <i>I caught my typo and corrected it. Are you the word police? Do you scan my posts hoping to gig me on something? >>
it's so easy.. and yes, when you make a smart ass comment about someones spelling, expect to have your own errors pointed out..
Mark Mulder rookies
Chipper Jones rookies
Orlando Cabrera rookies
Lawrence Taylor
Sam Huff
Lavar Arrington
NY Giants
NY Yankees
NJ Nets
NJ Devils
1950s-1960s Topps NY Giants Team cards
Looking for Topps rookies as well.
References:
GregM13
VintageJeff
<< <i>If you were able to pull off that trick before I corrected the typo, I'd give you kudos. >>
oh, i did indeed quote your typo before you caught it.. see my 8:35 post..
Obviously you don't understand the rules of humor.
<< <i>
<< <i>I would hope that a 10 would haqe at least decent enough centering that the naked eye wouldnt be able to tell the difference. >>
>>
Ouch.
Mark Mulder rookies
Chipper Jones rookies
Orlando Cabrera rookies
Lawrence Taylor
Sam Huff
Lavar Arrington
NY Giants
NY Yankees
NJ Nets
NJ Devils
1950s-1960s Topps NY Giants Team cards
Looking for Topps rookies as well.
References:
GregM13
VintageJeff
<< <i>Face it, a 10 should have no issues to the naked eye. This card is obviously not centered well. One needs to look only at the seller of the card and see why it got a grade of 10. >>
You're correct in theory but wrong in reality. Read PSA's definition for GEM MINT 10.