Home Sports Talk

Arnold the Governator doesn't want 1 NFL in LA - he wants 2!

AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭
Link

"After meeting with the owners, the actor-turned-politician emerged to say he was there to make sure "we're getting not only one NFL team to the Los Angeles area, Southern California, but to actually get two teams. That's why I came. Why limit it?"

What's this guy thinking? The reason teams left LA is no revenue...there's just too many other things to do in LA than sit at a game for 4 hours. LA fans are notorious for arrive late and leaving early. And Arnold thinks the team could support 2 teams?

Comments

  • DeutscherGeistDeutscherGeist Posts: 2,990 ✭✭✭✭
    I don't remember where you live (Washington State?), but this is a California concern and I would not expect others to even care unless they are broad minded. I like Schwarzenegger as my governor and my guess is that sports teams help stimulate the economy and give people an outlet to enjoy life.

    Your argument about the LA market being saturated with sports teams and different things to do around here is valid. However, our population is growing, so I think there is still some market potential. Angels Stadium and Dodgers Stadium are still the same size, more or less, than a decade ago, but the LA population has risen. I am sure the Scwarzenegger team did some number crunching and some research before making their assumptions on how football teams could impact the state and if there was a potential market here for that sport.

    I knew people here arrive late and leave early when it comes to games, but the ticket prices stay the same whether you are here 9 innings or 3.


    On a side note, Schwarzenegger is clever enough to back down on an idea that he sees is not working or is not going to work. He is the type of governor who wants to see things work, produce results and make people happy and content. In a way, I compare him to Julius Caesar's administration of the Roman Republic (now that is an interesting intellectual exercise).
    "So many of our DREAMS at first seem impossible, then they seem improbable, and then, when we SUMMON THE WILL they soon become INEVITABLE "- Christopher Reeve

    BST: Tennessebanker, Downtown1974, LarkinCollector, nendee
  • Funny how those in California tend to believe there is also no life east of Las Vegas! Those in Cali hate it when other's speak on an issue, yet, Cali tends to think what they say is the pulse of the nation! We's losers here in Detroit stay for games when we get our poopers handed to us on a weekly basis!


  • << <i>I don't remember where you live (Washington State?), but this is a California concern and I would not expect others to even care unless they are broad minded. I like Schwarzenegger as my governor and my guess is that sports teams help stimulate the economy and give people an outlet to enjoy life. >>





    First off, you like your governor, I like my president, but many from Cali would call me stupid and uneducated!

    I have been to Cali, I have been to Washington!

    I would much rather camp at Lake Wenatchee like I have a couple times, than ever go to Cali again, and people in the Seattle are much more to my liking, would much rather have someone look at me with a smile in Washington, than have someone look at me in disgust, because I am not a local, because I have a camera!

    Stimulate the economy? If the rich people there cared about that, they would not do their shopping in Europe!
  • stevekstevek Posts: 29,037 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I guess Arnold figures that since the San Francisco/Oakland area has two teams, then the Los Angeles area should also have two teams...logical thinking from an Austrian perspective of most probably not really understanding the history of the NFL.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    This thread has potential...........things can get interesting here, say in a few hours.

    LA can have 3 teams if they choose.

    Steveimage
    Good for you.
  • bishopbishop Posts: 2,917 ✭✭✭
    Rebutal from the Republic of Kalifornia ?
    Topps Baseball-1948, 1951 to 2017
    Bowman Baseball -1948-1955
    Fleer Baseball-1923, 1959-2007

    Al
  • gosteelersgosteelers Posts: 2,668 ✭✭✭
    Yeah, it was great when they had two teams seeing all of those empty seats, especially at the Raiders games. image

    California doesn't support the A's and Raiders now (both teams' attendance sucks), why should they expect to support two teams in the same city?
  • ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 12,868 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think the Governator is just being a politician -- he does not want to appear to favor LA or O.C. over the other, so he is supporting both for now. Realistically, I suspect he beleives the NFL will only put one team in the LA area to start, and then if things go well, will consider placing another one there.
  • MichiganMichigan Posts: 4,942
    The incentive by the NFL in having a team in LA is all about the national TV contract they have with
    various networks and having a team in the second largest TV market is very important.

    My guess is it will get done eventually, either a new franchise or by someone moving.

    (The LA Vikings?) image
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭
    I am from California.

    But this really stood out to me in your post:



    << <i>On a side note, Schwarzenegger is clever enough to back down on an idea that he sees is not working or is not going to work. >>



    Really? How did he do backing down from the idea of the special initiative election, even though every poll during and up to it said 'hey, we don't want this...save it for 2006?' And as a result, every one of his initiatives was thoroughly defeated.

    Why all the California hate in this thread? Republic of Kalifornia? Huh? What, because it's a liberal state that has major economic clout you feel the need to insult?


  • bishopbishop Posts: 2,917 ✭✭✭
    We have 3 offices in Kalifornia ( LA/SF/SD). It is a great state.....just unique.
    Topps Baseball-1948, 1951 to 2017
    Bowman Baseball -1948-1955
    Fleer Baseball-1923, 1959-2007

    Al
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    I think Kalifornia should should get back less then it does now in Federal tax so states like Mississppi and Arkansas and other poorer states can enjoy a higher standard of living. Sorta like the NBA, NFL and for those that have paid attention the NHL do. They all divide up the revenues .

    Also those living in kalifornia should have a limit as to the amount of income they can keep t. Any extra dollars they earn should be given to the poorer states.

    Steve
    Good for you.
  • ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 12,868 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Why all the California hate in this thread? Republic of Kalifornia? Huh? What, because it's a liberal state that has major economic clout you feel the need to insult? >>



    Wasn't always that way (liberal). In 1976 Calif went for Ford when the nation elected Carter.
  • DeutscherGeistDeutscherGeist Posts: 2,990 ✭✭✭✭
    I think connecticoin got it right. Schwarzenegger is just being a politician and not wanting to favor one thing over another, but secretly knows it will all work out by itself whether LA sustains one team or two.

    The Republic of Kalifornia is the 5th largest economy in the world (barely ahead of France). It is not an underdog people like to cheer about.
    "So many of our DREAMS at first seem impossible, then they seem improbable, and then, when we SUMMON THE WILL they soon become INEVITABLE "- Christopher Reeve

    BST: Tennessebanker, Downtown1974, LarkinCollector, nendee
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭


    << <i>I think Kalifornia should should get back less then it does now in Federal tax so states like Mississppi and Arkansas and other poorer states can enjoy a higher standard of living. Sorta like the NBA, NFL and for those that have paid attention the NHL do. They all divide up the revenues .

    Also those living in kalifornia should have a limit as to the amount of income they can keep t. Any extra dollars they earn should be given to the poorer states.

    Steve >>



    Do you work on continually driving down the quality of your posts? I mean this is perhaps the most moronic, idiotic thing you've ever said.

    Quit trying to equate the great state of california with the revenue sharing that should be happening baseball, you simple minded twit.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    LOL

    Steve
    Good for you.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Do you work on continually driving down the quality of your posts? I mean this is perhaps the most moronic, idiotic thing you've ever said.

    Perhaps, but it is still not as moronic as some of the dribble that has come out of that cement head that you have. You still have me beat. I would prolly have to post 30 more such posts to even attempt coming close to the idiotic rants that you seem to come up with. Now go and hide under your bed until I call for you.


    Steve
    Good for you.
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭
    WP-

    Oh dear boy...what am I going to do with you?

    Your post epitomizes what you are - someone who looks to pick (and lose) fights with me.

    Look, your post was beyond ridiculous, and had no relevance to the prior discussion about the much needed salary cap in baseball.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    LOL

    In your dreams boy, in ya dreams............

    Steve
    Good for you.
  • SoFLPhillyFanSoFLPhillyFan Posts: 3,931 ✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>I think Kalifornia should should get back less then it does now in Federal tax so states like Mississppi and Arkansas and other poorer states can enjoy a higher standard of living. Sorta like the NBA, NFL and for those that have paid attention the NHL do. They all divide up the revenues .

    Also those living in kalifornia should have a limit as to the amount of income they can keep t. Any extra dollars they earn should be given to the poorer states.

    Steve >>



    Do you work on continually driving down the quality of your posts? I mean this is perhaps the most moronic, idiotic thing you've ever said.

    Quit trying to equate the great state of california with the revenue sharing that should be happening baseball, you simple minded twit. >>



    Actually that is not such a bad idea. California sucks up a lot of federal dollars and spends it on things that many in other parts of the country may not agree on...such as support for illegal immigrants?

    But really, if we shared revenue equally with states like Mississippi and Arkansas they would just remain the 49th and 50th worst states for education, etc.
    Kind of like the Mariners. image



    << <i>The Republic of Kalifornia is the 5th largest economy in the world (barely ahead of France). >>



    Don't tell the French - they'll surrender.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    But really, if we shared revenue equally with states like Mississippi and Arkansas they would just remain the 49th and 50th worst states for education, etc.


    Just like the Mariners.


    hehe



    Exactly


    See Axhole that wasn't that hard.

    Steve
    Good for you.
Sign In or Register to comment.