New eBay BS - my listings ended for having 1/1 in title
A761506
Posts: 1,309 ✭✭✭
I don't know how eBay expects someone to know what they consider misleading since they don't publish a list (at least I couldn't find one), but they went and yanked 3 of my auctions because the title had 1/1 in it, but they say you can only list a card as 1/1 if it's actually stamped 1/1. Had I put "1 of 1", I wonder if that it legal, as I see that all the time. I can't imagine someone would have reported this, it would be ridiculous if they did, but then again, why else would eBay come after it. And they were somewhat obscure items (Bazooka cards).
Geez... I like eBay, but I sure am not happy with them right now.
Geez... I like eBay, but I sure am not happy with them right now.
0
Comments
Best,
Jim
Best,
Jim
Why take the chance of upsetting a good seller? Not a very wise move, even with the listing fees refunded.
It's hard to make money when you remove listings. I'm probably not even going to relist those cards right away either... so eBay just cost themselves about $25 by time all was said and done. Not much on a small scale, but pull a couple hundred thousand listings like that for petty reasons, and you've just lost millions of revenue.
if a card is the highest graded, and a 1/1, i always put "1/1" in the title..
I sent them a nasty email mentioning how they have hundreds of scammers on their site ripping people off on a daily basis and just got back a generic response. Complaining to them is just pissing in the wind.
Sadly a monopoly such as Feebay can make up the rules as they go along.
All the best, Bob C.
61 Topps (100%) 7.96
62 Parkhurst (100%) 8.70
63 Topps (100%) 7.96
63 York WB's (50%) 8.52
68 Topps (39%) 8.54
69 Topps (3%) 9.00
69 OPC (83%) 8.21
71 Topps (100%) 9.21 #1 A.T.F.
72 Topps (100%) 9.39
73 Topps (13%) 9.35
74 OPC WHA (95%) 8.57
75 Topps (50%) 9.23
77 OPC WHA (86%) 8.62 #1 A.T.F.
88 Topps (5%) 10.00
800.717.3229
Steve
At least ebay was specific in telling you that the 1/1 must be stamped on the card. Saying a card is 1/1 just because its the only PSA9 in recorded history can be misleading--pop reports change every second. You can say that it is the only PSA graded so far in the title or sub title, that will be more accurate.
I have no idea of your specific violation as there was no link. But there must be extra sensitivity paid to new collectors. You would not believe how mislead they are until you try and collect something new. I am picking up coin collecting and there are so many things to know before buying a single coin that it is easy to make a mistake and some sellers feast off of that--sadly.
I personally have difficulty getting some sellers on listing violations. So, I am surprised that people on this board are getting harassed as you guys are the cream of the crop when it comes to selling on ebay.
BST: Tennessebanker, Downtown1974, LarkinCollector, nendee
Im a powerseller with 100% feedback and Im not real pleased with feebay right now.
Winpitcher-----THANKS for that number. I think I looked and called friends for two hours last nite trying to find a number to call.Im certainly gonna make a call. Punishing good honest sellers is ridulous.
I also did a search on 1/1s on ebay and saw many other sellers with their cards not pulled.
Collecting Tony Perez PSA and Rookie Baseball PSA
<< <i>I also had two 1/1 listings pulled yesterday as well and they had multiple bids with many in the watch list.
Im a powerseller with 100% feedback and Im not real pleased with feebay right now.
Winpitcher-----THANKS for that number. I think I looked and called friends for two hours last nite trying to find a number to call.Im certainly gonna make a call. Punishing good honest sellers is ridulous.
I also did a search on 1/1s on ebay and saw many other sellers with their cards not pulled. >>
Ebay's reading all 1/1 auctions? Somebody was probably reporting these auctions to ebay. Those cancelled auctions, did ebay return the insertion fees? From what I read (somewhere) feebay will start pocketing the insertion fees.
looks like ebay returned my fees for the cancelled auctions and I did talk to an ebay rep on the phone and explained what is going on. I was given another number to call tomorrow with somebody who might be able to look into this matter a bit further. Tthe thought of someone reporting the auctions crossed my mind as well but when I saw this thread and that it was happening to others I kinda let that thought go.
It gets a bit ridiculous with auctions like Scott Susors reminding you he has a three way tie for the 44th toughest 8 in the 19....whatever set with only 10 grading higher but that is his right and choice to descibe it that way. Most buyers have access to the same pop reports and also have a good idea of which cards are tough in the set they collect. It is my opinion that if you have a 1/1 Psa 10 or 9 ...then by all means you should be able to put that in your listing. The population reports are updated every Monday.
Even if a seller made an error and said they had a 1/1 ...it is still up to the buyer to make the choice of what they are willing to pay if they need that said card. Just like buying the card and not the cert.
The bottom line is these auctions ebay pulled from members of this board were all legit and not fraud .
Ebay should put their efforts into the fake Mantle Rc auctions and all the spoof emails from hackers...etc
By their own definition, a 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, etc. couldn't be used either because it isn't 'stamped' on the card or slab.
If they're going to target 1/1's, then they must continue the quest and target all 1/ofanynumbers!!!!!!
How can they single out 1/1's and not any other combination?????!!!!!
<< <i>Ebay customer service, with a live person
800.717.3229
Steve >>
NOTE: This number has a funny little habit of changing every so often... can't let people catch on to where they can find REAL help
Yes, I collect shiny modern crap
All your Shaq are belong to me
If any of you were the seller of the 1981 Steelers Police Terry Bradshaw PSA 9 1/1 that got pulled, I would be interested. Please PM me.
Thanks,
Ken
Last week I had the 1/1 on the title because it was the only SGC 98 graded.
It was cancelled within the last 7 hours. I relisted it, and it ended less so it
was a waste of time and money. I won't be doing that anymore.
I see it all the time in the title, and it doesn't bother me. I don't report it.
While the card may truly be the only one with that grade at the start of the auction, 6 more may be added to the pop by day 3 of your auction. Is anyone really going back and changing their descriptions to now reflect 1 of 7??
1 of 1 should only be used on serial numbered cards issued and numbered by the manufacturer as 1 of 1, period. I can't think of any other use of 1 of 1 without it being equal to deception/fraud.
But that doesn't irk me as much as sellers trying to sell a Roger Clemens jersey card numbered 22 out of 500 as a "True 1 of 1" because #22 is his jersey number. That's the worst.
shawn
<< <i>1 of 1 should only be used on serial numbered cards issued and numbered by the manufacturer as 1 of 1, >>
so it is ok for the manufacturer to put 1/1 and create rarity, typical modern card collector response right here . a psa card that is the only one at that grade is what it is 1/1 . the manufacturer stamps 1/1 , tweaks 1 border stamps another 1/1 , now you have 2 1/1's of the same crap. ebay is out of line, 1/1,1/2 etc is the only way for the seller to point out hte difficulty in that grade without wasting money on a subtitle to get more space. don't kid yourself , this is fee driven and protecting consumers is the last thing ebay is thinking about
<< <i>but I have to say that if you list something as 1/1 based solely on the fact that its the only example graded to acheive a particular grade, then the auction should be pulled. >>
wrong..
do you sell cards?..
Best,
Jim
So, it was clearly a helpful thing that they cracked down on "PSA 1/1" in a title, which was actually a legitimate search that would return 40-50 results, all of which were pretty clearly within the confines of the search - and no guns or computer parts.
Pure stupidity, and I own a lot of stock in them too.
I think PSA has some sort of working relation with eBay and the sports cards listings, I'd be suprised if they don't have anything to say, as 1/1's and other low pop. cards are a huge drive for their business and without the ability to advertise as such, it definitely can take some of the appeal out of an auction.
i could put a 1961 psa 9 common on ebay, as a 1/1, and does ebay have an "expert" that automatically knows that cards werent being stamped in 1961? (i know, i know, it doesnt take an expert to know that, but does ebay put ANY research into it before they cancel the listings?)
and to pandrews - once in a while, I do sell cards. I would never list a card as 1/1 solely based on the grade of the slab. Sellers who do that do so with the intention of deceiving the uninformed into believing that they are getting a one of a kind item. That's like selling a red Porshe and saying its the only one ever painted red. Very easy for a black Porshe owner to drive to the body shop for a paint job. To list a card as 1/1 based on the grade of the slab is tantamount to fraud. If you listed the auction as "only one to be graded a PSA 10 as of this writing" or "only PSA 10 in the pop report", that would give a clearer picture and would not be deceptive.
<< <i>To list a card as 1/1 based on the grade of the slab is tantamount to fraud. If you listed the auction as "only one to be graded a PSA 10 as of this writing" or "only PSA 10 in the pop report", that would give a clearer picture and would not be deceptive. >>
I whole-heartedly disagree with you. Vintage card collectors [particularly, since populations are less likely to change] use this convention all the time on Ebay. There isn't enough space in an Ebay listing to put "only one to be graded a PSA 10 as of this writing", and if a seller simply has "1/1" in the title, the vast majority of vintage bidders understand that to mean a population 1 card. Same goes for PSA 8s and 9s.
Listen - Ebay can say whatever the heck they want. But standard collecting practice and convention, as used on Ebay over the last five-ten years, basically stipulates that you can use 1/8 or whatever to describe a low population card in the title. It is not deceptive to the people bidding on these auctions.
~ms
<< <i>Sellers who do that do so with the intention of deceiving the uninformed into believing that they are getting a one of a kind item. That's like selling a red Porshe and saying its the only one ever painted red. Very easy for a black Porshe owner to drive to the body shop for a paint job. To list a card as 1/1 based on the grade of the slab is tantamount to fraud. >>
you're very wrong again..
i'd almost be willing to bet that you've sold SGC cards with PSA spammed in the title, too..
I also got the feeling that someone is complaining about the auctions and that is how they are being canceled. I dont think it is a random computer thing.
Why is ebay worrying about 1/1 when they should be taking care of sellers like this jerk...
He has the word PSA in all of his listings (19), and not one card is a PSA card.
Check Out This Guy's Listings.
ebay, leave Honest Sellers alone.
Mary
Also, the argument that 'more cards could get that grade this week' sounds a little ad hoc. I think most hobbyists would agree that using 1/1 is acceptable so long as the card was 1/1 at the time the auction went up.
<< <i>I dont get into the 1 of 1 debate too often but I have to say that if you list something as 1/1 based solely on the fact that its the only example graded to acheive a particular grade, then the auction should be pulled.
While the card may truly be the only one with that grade at the start of the auction, 6 more may be added to the pop by day 3 of your auction. Is anyone really going back and changing their descriptions to now reflect 1 of 7??
1 of 1 should only be used on serial numbered cards issued and numbered by the manufacturer as 1 of 1, period. I can't think of any other use of 1 of 1 without it being equal to deception/fraud. >>
Uh, no-- if you say 1/1, and then go on (as almost everyone does) to say that this is the only card to earn said grade, there's not a lick of deception or fraud involved.
I know common sense isn't really in vogue, but come on now-- If you've got an 86 Topps Nolan Ryan in PSA 10 up on the block and list it as a 1/1 I don't think a single person with even a passing interest in sportscards is going to think that was the only 1986 Topps Ryan that was ever printed.
and to those of you who see nothing wrong with using 1/1 in your auctions to describe the grade, so be it. Its your choice to do that and whether its an accepted hobby practice now or not, I won't be bidding. Best of luck.
<< <i>They've also pulled my auctions for having "cash" as a form of payment. Must cut into their Paypal fees. >>
A couple of you mentioned something similar to the above. Are you saying that if you list anywhere in your description that you accept cash as one of your payment forms that Ebay will pull the auction? I always list "Paypal, cash, money order or personal check."
<< <i>and to those of you who see nothing wrong with using 1/1 in your auctions to describe the grade, so be it. Its your choice to do that and whether its an accepted hobby practice now or not, I won't be bidding. Best of luck. >>
<< <i>
<< <i>and to those of you who see nothing wrong with using 1/1 in your auctions to describe the grade, so be it. Its your choice to do that and whether its an accepted hobby practice now or not, I won't be bidding. Best of luck. >>
>>
My Auctions
<< <i>pandrews - I'm so glad that I have amused you....or is it that you couldn't come up with a witty response and were compelled to use that silly icon? >>
HEY! I'm the one that used that silly icon!
My Auctions
<< <i>pandrews - I'm so glad that I have amused you....or is it that you couldn't come up with a witty response and were compelled to use that silly icon? >>
no, my response would be that i dont give a flying rats ass if you'll "be bidding" or not..
<< <i>rest easy pandrews, you will never have to worry about me buying a PSA graded card from you. >>
or possibly you already have, and don't know it..
i noticed you're even policing the "metal detecting" forum now.. LINK..
how much somebody wanna bet southerncards is the idiot that reported yall's 1/1 auctions?
Maybe he can answer that question for us if he has a pair.
<< <i>Oh it crossed my mind after I read his first post.
Maybe he can answer that question for us if he has a pair. >>
Unlikely
My Auctions
Bowman Baseball -1948-1955
Fleer Baseball-1923, 1959-2007
Al
<< <i>I am with you pandrews....If I had a flying rats ass I would not give it up either....might be valuable >>
as far as "policing" the MD forum, again, much laughter here. Any upstanding citizen should be offended by the proliferation of drug references on a website often frequented by juveniles. Your mockery of my comments leads me to conclude the reality of which side of the bong you stand on.