ICG crossover attempt: Grades in

1960NYGiants

Here are 3 pieces I won, very cheap, from recent auctions. All are graded by ICG as MS67, the white smears are scuffs on the holders. Soon, they will be on their way for a vacation on the west coast. Should I crack 'em out 1st? or select cross at any grade? Grade opinioins welcome. I'll post mine a bit later.

PBRat

I have three ICG nickels: 1955, 1956, and 1957. Two are MS66's, the other is a MS67. All three are actually Prooflike coins, that I'd grade as PL65.

I've been meaning to send them in - maybe I'll wait to see how you do




Edited cuz my grammer is bad

bosox

Gene - I think the cent will go 5 red. - Rob

ajaan

Crack, then send. Crossing an ICG slab is the kiss of death IMO.

65, 65, 64. PCGS is getting brutal with Canadian coins.

Stork

Out of curiosity only...why crossover? I have a mish-mash of slabs and have sometimes thought about standardizing (or even, GASP) cracking 'em out and leaving them that way. But.. A) I'm lazy and I'm cheap.

Cathy

ajaan

Registry set is my guess

1960NYGiants

<< <i>Registry set is my guess >>



Ding, ding, ding, ding - spot on. Filling some holes in my sets.

IMHO - the grades are:
1940 one cent: 65 red, very slight chance at 66.
1944 five cents: solid 65.
1957 five cents 63, coin looks baggy to me (was paired with the '44 in the lot).

I admit I have a hard time grading nickel coins - can't always tell the difference between rub and weak strike, especially on QEII.

If the 1st 2 go 65 then I will be way ahead in value. With the grading fees I'll be about $100 into them.

Oh and they will be submitted raw.

PBRat

1957 five cents 63, coin looks baggy to me (was paired with the '44 in the lot).

Does the 1957 appear to be a Prooflike coin?

FilamCoins

How'd you do??

1960NYGiants

I was delayed in sending them in by about 60 days - LOL. Decided to crack them out 1st.

Still waiting for the results of submission #9050313 - 10 of 20 items are crack-outs.

1960NYGiants

Grades in: all were cracked out prior to submitting Rec'd 6/13/06 shipped 8/11/06

10114692 1937 50C CANADA MS62 Was ICCS 63, expected 63
10114697 1880-H 10C CANADA Scratch or Rim Nick Was ANACS 55, expected 50 saw the scratch at bun didn't think it would bb
10114698 1938 10C CANADA MS63 Was NGC 63, expected 63 shot 64
10114699 1891 5C CANADA XF45 Was NGC 45, expected 45 or bb cleaned
10114700 1944 5C CANADA MS64 Was ICG 67, expected 65 hope 66
10114701 1957 5C CANADA MS64 Was ICG 67, expected 63
10114705 1918 1C CANADA Questionable ColorRB Was ICCS 63RD, expected 64rb or bb color - coin had oily film and was acetoned (new verb? LOL)
10114706 1919 1C CANADA Questionable ColorRB Was ICCS 63RD, same as above
10114707 1931 1C CANADA MS63RB Was ICG 65RB, expected 64rb or bb color - acetoned to remove dirt from legends
10114708 1940 1C CANADA MS64RD Was ICG 67RD, expected 65 rd shot 66rd
10114709 1951 1C CANADA MS64RD Was ICCS 65RD, expected 64rd

Tally is:
ICG lost on average 2.75 points
ICCS lost on average 1 point + 2 BB's
NGC was even 2 for 2
ANACS 1 BB

JZrarities

Hmmm...very interesting.

Thanks for the informative post.

JamminJ

Any chance you could post a pic of these two:



<< <i>10114705 1918 1C CANADA Questionable ColorRB Was ICCS 63RD, expected 64rb or bb color - coin had oily film and was acetoned (new verb? LOL)
10114706 1919 1C CANADA Questionable ColorRB Was ICCS 63RD, same as above
>>




I'd love to see what the boys in Newport Beach dislike.