I like these a whole lot John 1813-O-107A AU53--nice coin 1834-O-104 AU53 -nice also 1835-O-108 AU50 - I'll take this one too Hope I am right on the varieties
I would love to see that 13 go 58 for you John --- as stman always likes to say (and it is soo true) it's all about the luster---I hope its there for you. This 13 reminds me of the thread you had the other day about the dreaded weak strike That was a great thread.
I'll guess 53 on the 1813, and who cares on the bullion rounds.
BTW, that 13 107 isn't all that late of a die state. It comes as the most severely cracked die marriage in the entire series; when you see a terminal die state coin, it is a sight!
Comments
But the fact that you will give the coins to the closest guesser makes it worthwhile!
I'll go with 55, 63, 58
1813-O-107A AU53--nice coin
1834-O-104 AU53 -nice also
1835-O-108 AU50 - I'll take this one too
Hope I am right on the varieties
AU58... Is what I would give it.. Thinking PCGS may hit at 55
When you first look at the 35 you almost want to say MS... But looking close AU55
Camelot
64
64
siliconvalleycoins.com
<< <i>Man!! you guys are tough on that 1813. >>
Who is you guys? I said 55 if the luster is there..... I thought I was very fair.
That was a great thread.
The 1834 might go PCGS AU50. I don't like the left field action, the color marks there, and the plan flaw in the cap.
The 1835 may be BB. It has retoned after some kind of "improvement attempt", and the entire rim looks suspicious from the obverse picture.
It sure is hard to grade 200 year old circulated coins from pictures, even though they are very nice pictures.
david
BTW, that 13 107 isn't all that late of a die state. It comes as the most severely cracked die marriage in the entire series; when you see a terminal die state coin, it is a sight!
roadrunner
Check out some of my 1794 Large Cents on www.coingallery.org