The look I like - 1923 Standing Quarter
TommyType
Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭✭✭
Just got this in the mail today. A good way to break my 2 month non-purchasing streak!
Care to grade it?
FH or Not FH?
AT or NT?
Original or Dipped/Retoned?
Care to grade it?
FH or Not FH?
AT or NT?
Original or Dipped/Retoned?
Easily distracted Type Collector
0
Comments
- Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 BC
edited to add lightly dipped and retoned, not FH
<< <i>Just got this in the mail today. A good way to break my 2 month non-purchasing streak!
Care to grade it?
FH or Not FH?
AT or NT?
Original or Dipped/Retoned? >>
For the interested parties:
- Grade: NGC MS-63 (They could call it 64 without any complaint from me...but then I probably wouldn't have paid for it).
- NOT FH...that was an easy one.
- NT from my guess....couldn't imagine anyone claiming AT, but who knows.
- Can't claim to be an expert on originality, so I won't offer a guess. Interested in any further opinions.
I'm happy with her!
collections: Maryland related coins & exonumia, 7070 Type set, and Video Arcade Tokens.
The Low Budget Y2K Registry Set
Grade not sure..... Not a series I have studied much at all.....
http://my.affinity.is/cancer-research?referral_code=MjI4Nzgz
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
<< <i>Looks MS65...not FH...nice coin, and I like the toning...good rivet detail as well as vertical and horizontal lines on shield...scr >>
Exactly. The reverse should look fine in hand since the dullness isn't on only the high spots.
The coin looks great.