55 Proof Franklin

buc

Any thoughts on this coin in it's current grade and holder?

braddick

unfortunutely jwcameo is not known for his honest photos.

With that said though the coin does look nice and certainly with a PCGS price of well over 1K the asking price (BIN) of $309. would seem, at least on the surface, reasonable.

Again, I'd pass simply based on the seller and his use of manipulation of photos. Then again, if you're a gambling man, he does offer a seven day return.

Good luck either way!

Myqqy

It looks like a dcam in any holder if the photos are accurate- I would be concerned about hairlines that don't show in the photo, since I don't have full faith in ICG grading.... but if there's a full return policy, then it might be worth a shot.....

08HALA20

I am not a coin expert by any means, (LUCY or Russ could tell you in a flash)

It sems to me the bell is weak for a dcam or cam also it looks like the frost is smudged (maybe pic)--threads about painted on frost.

In an ICG holder by a "knowledgable" seller? If this was a dcam it would already be in a PCGS or NGC holder.

Downside is quite a biit at $309 BIN.

ROOKIE Joe

joecheck

Looks painted! It doesn't seem very reflective for a DCAM. It should be reflecting the slab lines and it's not.

tsacch

i have bought from him before................the coin will not look like the pic. I bought a full 1955 proof set....granted it did have cameo on every coin, obv and rev, but not nearly like what was in the pic.........if you pay normal price and a no premium, could be a nice coin.

Steve27

"It sems to me the bell is weak for a dcam ..."

I agree, and if it's a scan as opposed to a photo, it is probably only a Cameo at best IMO.

Heywood

You have to think Pr65 cam at best. As was mentioned before, seller has rep for enhancing photos,

I also second the notion that if this coins had any shot at a DCAM, a knowledgable seller would have already cracked it out.

Thr fields also look blurry. (Post slab dip gone bad?)