Garrett Ace ?'s
30AnvZ28
Posts: 1,619
Is the 300 better then the 250 because I can get one for about $10 more then the 250.
0
Comments
<< <i>The Ace 250 is junk. So many false targets I finally had to just sell the thing and buy something else. I should've known better, though, that I wouldn't get a Lexus for the price of a Chevy. >>
I have to agree with him 100%. I bought one as well and absolutely hated it, i ended up selling it and got another cheapy bounty hunter for 1/3 the price.
Complete random signals, pin pointer sucks...not a good machine IMHO
Maybe you guys had defective units ? Highly mineralized soil ? Cracked coils ? Weak batteries ? Electrical interference ?
I don't know, but from my experience its by far the best detector under $500. Light weight, accurate, sensitive and simple and I found well over $3,000 worth of goodies in my first season at depths up to 8 inches - And in woodchip play areas, it just cannot be beat.
Obviously, yes, a top line Whites would out perform it. Not everyone has $1,000 + to lay down on something like that - And to compare it with a cheap bounty hunter is really, really bad advice IMO ... Though what the heck, I suppose radio shack/walmart employees must eat, same as the rest of us.
30AnvZ28, as stated, the 300 is not a viable option anymore.
I'd go with the 250 pro pack if I was you, which includes the standard coil and a larger one for greater depth, for under $300.
Or the standard 250 with a single coil for $50 less.