Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Hand cut Early 1900's ???

poppiepoppie Posts: 598
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
I bought these several weeks ago, because I never saw them before and they were not very expensive. I have no idea of their history, if the are vintage or reprints, etc. Anyone know? I was thinking about sending them in on the PSA pre 1953 special running now. Will PSA holder these? HELP !!!!!image
My focus, 1970 Topps Baseball Raw and Graded, pre 1989 PSA Hockey and 1933 INDIAN GUM ! Yikes!!

Comments

  • poppiepoppie Posts: 598
    This was my second scan ever. Why so huge? I am on dial up and it took 60 seconds to load.
    My focus, 1970 Topps Baseball Raw and Graded, pre 1989 PSA Hockey and 1933 INDIAN GUM ! Yikes!!
  • pontiacinfpontiacinf Posts: 8,915 ✭✭
    dpi must be set way high on the scanner

    way cool cards, but being a coin man I have no idea who does what with them image
    image

    Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
  • Tedw9Tedw9 Posts: 1,424 ✭✭
    They remind me of 1915 W515 set, an old strip card set. I could be wrong, as I believe there are other strip card sets from around that time. I am not sure if PSA will grade them or not, thats a question for another boardie.

    If you don't mind me asking, how much did you pay for them?
    Looking for Carl Willey items.
  • lostdart58lostdart58 Posts: 2,938 ✭✭✭
    The earliest these cards could be would be the late twenties. Cobb managed from 1921- 1926. Alexander was not a Cardinal until 1927.

    Scott a White Sox for only a short time in 1926
    Collector of:Baseball
    1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better

    Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
    Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
    Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete


  • kennylowkennylow Posts: 277
    PSA will holder strip cards, but yours are cut too short and at best, they'll holder them as Authentic. In order to give them a grade, they'd need the card to meet minimum size requirements (I think).

    Your cards look like the W512 set, but I'm not sure. Here's a link to: http://www.oldcardboard.com/w/w512/w512.asp?cardsetID=813
  • poppiepoppie Posts: 598


    << <i>If you don't mind me asking, how much did you pay for them? >>

    $105 for all four. Figured it was worth a try.
    My focus, 1970 Topps Baseball Raw and Graded, pre 1989 PSA Hockey and 1933 INDIAN GUM ! Yikes!!
  • poppiepoppie Posts: 598


    << <i>Your cards look like the W512 set, but I'm not sure. Here's a link to: http://www.oldcardboard.com/w/w512/w512.asp?cardsetID=813 >>

    I think you are correct. Thank you. Ps I overpaid.
    My focus, 1970 Topps Baseball Raw and Graded, pre 1989 PSA Hockey and 1933 INDIAN GUM ! Yikes!!
  • lostdart58lostdart58 Posts: 2,938 ✭✭✭
    Buy the entire set.
    Collector of:Baseball
    1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better

    Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
    Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
    Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete


  • MorrellManMorrellMan Posts: 3,241 ✭✭✭
    as others have said, it is the W512 set - here's mine, complete:
    image
    Mark (amerbbcards)


    "All evil needs to triumph is for good men to do nothing."
  • pandrewspandrews Posts: 7,598 ✭✭✭


    cool cards.. here's my Ruth..
    image
    ·p_A·
  • HoofHeartedHoofHearted Posts: 2,537 ✭✭


    << <i>This was my second scan ever. Why so huge? I am on dial up and it took 60 seconds to load. >>



    poppie,

    If you want to reduce the size of your images, go back into Photobucket, click on the "Edit" button above the image, then choose whether you want to reduce it by 75, 50 or 25%. I start out with 75%, go back and reload the message and go back and forth until I get the size I want.

    lmk if you have any other problems with this stuff!

    hh

    p.s. That some fun stuff you're collecting. It's amazing to see how many others here are so on top of that set! I bow down...I'm not worthy!
    imageimageimageSenators/Twins Type Collection
Sign In or Register to comment.