Home U.S. Coin Forum

There's this raw coin in the ANR auction... (updated with link to coins)

BarryBarry Posts: 10,100 ✭✭✭
I asked a dealer to look at a few coins for me in the ANR auction. We get to talking about another coin in the auction, which I did not ask him to evaluate (it was the next lot up from one I did have him look at). He likes it and asks me why I didn't ask him to look at it - there's a similar PCGS coin I did have him look at (which he didn't like).
Me: It's raw.
Him: Oh, you're one of those.
Me: I once got burned on a raw coin in an auction. Never again.
Him: I like the raw one better than the PCGS coin. Think about it.
Me: I'll think about it (yeah, right)

My feeling is it isn't slabbed for a reason, even if he did like it better than the slabbed one. What would you do?

Comments

  • I have the same problem, but would have to drive thru rush hour to see just 1 coin.image
    morgannut2
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,797 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If I had a track record with the dealer, I might go for it. When in doubt, don't.
  • Agree w/track record idea--Frankly there are some dealers that grade much better than PCGS, unless you need it for the Registry.
    morgannut2
  • BarryBarry Posts: 10,100 ✭✭✭
    I do trust the dealer. However, it obviously got bagged by PCGS, so if and when I decide to sell, that could be a problem.
  • elwoodelwood Posts: 2,414
    I would'nt rule it out. It all depends on how much you value the opinion of your Rep.



    << <i>Him: I like the raw one better than the PCGS coin. >>


    I guess I would want a little more of a detailed description, and an opinion as to why it's raw.
    Please visit my website prehistoricamerica.com www.visitiowa.org/pinecreekcabins
  • robertprrobertpr Posts: 6,862 ✭✭✭
    Him: Oh, you're one of those.

    One of those what? People who don't like problem coins? I would ask him to clarify his statement if I were you.
  • There are a few raw coins in that auction I'd love to have, but am also afraid to bid on them.
    Even if an TPgrader looked at it for me and said it was 'ok', I'd still realize I risk it being body bagged for some reason or another. I don't think you can get that guarantee until it's actually holdered, and then, as with holdered coins that have great toning, there's no guarantee if you break it out, it won't get body bagged as AT at another time...especially if the tpg is going through a cautious phase.
    You could call ANR and ask them about the coin. They're a great bunch of people. I believe their honest. They likely got the coin from a collector who never had them holdered to begin with. Of course, there's no guarantee.
    I've purchased raw coins from Stacks three times. One, I actually payed 5 digits for and was rewarded with it being holdered and given a grade only 1 step below what I had hoped for. The two other coins; one was body bagged and obviously so, the other wasn't what Stack's had claimed it was, and I learned a lot about coins (they did take it back believe it or not).
    Tempting when you see a really nice looking coin without a holder, but worrisome nonetheless.

    M.
  • TrinkettsTrinketts Posts: 1,699


    << <i>I do trust the dealer. However, it obviously got bagged by PCGS, so if and when I decide to sell, that could be a problem. >>



    This wouldnt happen to be that spotted wild blue toned bust half is it ....
    Either write something worth reading or do something worth writing about. -Benjamin Franklin-
  • LongacreLongacre Posts: 16,717 ✭✭✭
    It would depend on the dealer and my faith in his assessment. If he likes it that much, have him gurantee a floor if you decide to sell it to him in the future (taking some form of market fluctuation formula into account).
    Always took candy from strangers
    Didn't wanna get me no trade
    Never want to be like papa
    Working for the boss every night and day
    --"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
  • JulianJulian Posts: 3,370 ✭✭✭
    I am the dealer. I will not tell you which coin.

    Please remember that all coins do not have to be encapsulated to be valuable!!!

    Most professionals and specialist collectors will buy unencapsulated coins because they do know what they are looking at.

    Coins were not produced for collecting.

    Numismatists have decided to do that after the government makes the coins for commerce.

    Long time and serious numismatists do not have to have all of their coins encapsulated.



    PNG member, numismatic dealer since 1965. Operates a retail store, also has exhibited at over 1000 shows.
    I firmly believe in numismatics as the world's greatest hobby, but recognize that this is a luxury and without collectors, we can all spend/melt our collections/inventories.

    eBaystore
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,797 ✭✭✭✭✭
    However, it obviously got bagged by PCGS, so if and when I decide to sell, that could be a problem.

    If you are strongly considering the exit strategy, and the coin is expensive, I would pass. I think you have recent experience in this area which is justifiably causing you to be cautious.

    With all due respect to Julian (whom I respect very immensely), expensive slabbed coins appear to be more liquid than raw.
  • BarryBarry Posts: 10,100 ✭✭✭
    Him: Oh, you're one of those.

    One of those what? People who don't like problem coins? I would ask him to clarify his statement if I were you.


    It was said in jest, but what Julain meant was one of those who doesn't buy raw, expensive coins.

  • raysrays Posts: 2,399 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Barry
    It depends on the context. I once bought a high grade lettered edge wreath cent from a Superior sale (Frankenfield), ex. Norweb. The coin had never been slabbed by anyone (ie, it had never been bodybagged). It had a pedigree back 50+ years so I felt reasonably sure it would slab.

    There are many raw coins in Stacks' sales that I bid on (after having a dealer examine them for me first).

  • elwoodelwood Posts: 2,414
    Actually, there are a couple coins that I will be bidding on that are raw. If you like the coin who cares as long as you understand what you are buying.
    Please visit my website prehistoricamerica.com www.visitiowa.org/pinecreekcabins
  • stmanstman Posts: 11,352 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>If you like the coin who cares as long as you understand what you are buying. >>



    image
    Please... Save The Stories, Just Answer My Questions, And Tell Me How Much!!!!!
  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭
    There's this raw coin in the ANR auction...


    What would you do?

    i would only buy coins that are raw or slabbed or whatever

    THAT YOU HAVE EXAMINED YOURSELF IN HAND SIGHT SEEN AND ARE COMFORTABLE WITH AS TO THE PRICE YOU ARE WILLING TO PAY based on your experience

    if you cant do all of the above......................................then let the buyer beware
  • JulianJulian Posts: 3,370 ✭✭✭
    fyi, the raw coin went for more than the slabbed one!
    PNG member, numismatic dealer since 1965. Operates a retail store, also has exhibited at over 1000 shows.
    I firmly believe in numismatics as the world's greatest hobby, but recognize that this is a luxury and without collectors, we can all spend/melt our collections/inventories.

    eBaystore
  • VamGuyVamGuy Posts: 1,624
    Julian, One more post and you hit a grand. image

    Make it memorable. image
  • fcfc Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭
    i am still curious why the coin was not slabbed like the majority
    of the rest in the auction.

    too bad we cannot follow this coin as it goes to a TPG after
    this auction and see the results?

    did a forum member win it?
  • lavalava Posts: 3,286 ✭✭✭
    Don't let us idiots make you think you are smart enough to buy raw. Just assume you are an idiot like the rest of us, and you stand little chance in making out on a raw coin. You have a proven track record of falling short. Deep inside you know you are an idiot, no offense. Save your money for the slabs, and leave the raw coins for Laura. Besides, with the tpgs supposedly tightening, who wants to buy raw in this market -- you will likely overpay.

    From one idiot to another. image
    I brake for ear bars.
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,797 ✭✭✭✭✭
    fyi, the raw coin went for more than the slabbed one!

    I must say that it is fitting.
  • BarryBarry Posts: 10,100 ✭✭✭
    Here are links to the 2 coins:
    Lot 35

    Lot 36

    If anyone has an idea as to why PCGS slabbed lot 35, but not lot 36, I'd like to hear it. Do you think the cheek was worked to hide the X?
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,162 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It says graffitti in the fields. Obviously the overall condition of the coin netted out slightly better than the holdered coin with the dig.

    As Mr Eureka once stated - the TPG's tend to punish human mishandling higher than commerce mishandling. This is a great example of such.
  • mozinmozin Posts: 8,755 ✭✭✭
    It would be an easy decision for me. I would pass on both coins based on what Julian said. No way I would buy raw.

    The person who bought the raw coin now likely will need to deal with one of the grading services, in hopes of getting the grade he thinks it will bring. This type of hassle I have learned to avoid. I leave submissions to other people.image
    I collect Capped Bust series by variety in PCGS AU/MS grades.
  • What on earth does the PCGS opinion have to do with anything-- Gee lot 36 is a really nice coin with great detail that some moron long ago put some light intials in the field. The other one (35) is OK, but not as nicely toned or struck etc and has light circulation damage. Either you can live with a pretty example with light initials or not---PCGS won't holder coins with initials (unless a really good doctor removes themimage)
    morgannut2
  • NicNic Posts: 3,386 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I do not understand the "not buy it raw" thing. I look at every purchase as if it was. K
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,797 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would have considered the raw coin in this circumstance. There are coins that transcend the grade or holder--these are truly historic. How many of us can claim that we own a coin that was once personally handled by Thomas Jefferson? (other than BillJones, that is)

    Edit: Now that we know what you are seeking, we will surely run you up next time around. image Gee, these have become expen$ive!
  • ERER Posts: 7,345
    No big deal. Buy lot 36, have some doctor remove the graffitti, and NGC will slab it. Remember the McCoy 1794 dollar that was graffittied? It's NGC AU55 now, sans graffitti.image

    Btw, I'll take Lot 36 over 35 any day.
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭

    I'm curious why the one coin with the major scratch got slabbed and the other with "SI" did not. Hmmmm....

    Either way, I would have gone for the raw coin, but that's just me.

    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • JRoccoJRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Lets see....... That horrid Peace dollar from a few weeks ago got holdered ---and given the stamp of approval ---(Nod Nod Wink Wink), but this true piece of American history that someone mildly scratched gets bagged------- Why is this just plain wrong.
    Some coins are just plain "Interesting"
  • ccexccex Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭
    My biggest coin buying regret of last year was not buying a raw coin Julian offered me at a show last June. Instead, I held out for one in a slab. The first one like it which I bought was overgraded by ANACS and wasted my time and $30 returning it. The second, (from a Heritage auction) was awarded a grade by NGC higher than Julian's grade on his raw one, and sits in my type set album for the time being, even though it is 10% more expensive with less eye appeal than Julian's raw coin. However, it is the intersting date Julian recommended for my type set.

    I trust very few dealers who tell me that a raw coin is a better value than a slabbed one, since most are trying to turn over their body-bagged inventory. I make a big exception for Julian and perhaps four other dealers I have met in the last 30 years.

    "Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity" - Hanlon's Razor
  • Conder101Conder101 Posts: 10,536
    You trust the dealers opinion on the slabbed coin, but not on the raw coin?

    Why did one get slabbed and not the other? Possibly only one was submitted.

    Of the two I like the one with the very light initials better than the slabbed one with the heavy gash in the obverse field up to the chin, scratches on the head, the multiple scraches on the reverse, and what looks like a bad repair job on the reverse in the field above the eagles left wing. I would have netted the PCGS about two grades lower than the raw coin. The only reason I can think of that it brought that much was because someone bought the number on the holder.

    My first impression seing both of them is that the raw piece is a nice coin but unfortunately with a minor problem. I see the PCGS piece and think "It's a good thing this is a rare and popular coins, because otherwise this is a piece of junk."
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,797 ✭✭✭✭✭
    For a coin that is this expensive, you have to love it to buy it. My initial response, before the additional information (including the identity of the dealer and the coin) still holds. If there is any doubt, PASS. Buyer's remorse can be a powerful emotion. Why risk it? Wait for the piece in which there is no doubt.

    Edit: One more thing: call me any name or hurl any insult that you like. I am not sure that I will ever purchase a $65,000 coin (ie. lot 36), but if I do, it will be holdered. Being idealistic is one thing and practical another.
  • BarryBarry Posts: 10,100 ✭✭✭
    You trust the dealers opinion on the slabbed coin, but not on the raw coin?

    I trust the dealer's opinion, however, that doesn't mean I'm willing to buy a raw coin worth that much money. It also comes down to the ease of future salability.

    Why did one get slabbed and not the other? Possibly only one was submitted.

    This is ANR, not Stacks. I'm sure the coin was submitted and BBed. I don't understand why it was BBed, after seeing the gouge in the field of lot 35, yet it was slabbed.
  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,052 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Lot 36 is much nicer than lot 35. 21 years ago, the price differential would have shown that, since there wouldn't have been some expensioso plastic clouding the issue. The coins were what they were then and are what they are now. The big question is if the buyer of Lot 36 had an estimate in hand from a doctor on what it would cost to get it into an NGC 35 holder. If so, keep a copy of that picture, because it'll show up again. If PCGS had a policy that didn't condemn coins like Lot 36, a historically significant coin would be spared being f**ked with just for the sake of a plastic holder.
  • LincolnCentManLincolnCentMan Posts: 5,347 ✭✭✭✭
    General rules that have kept me out of trouble:

    1) If the coin is over $100 where the value is tied significantly to condition, it has to be in a PCGS, NGC, or ANACS holder.
    2) If the coin is over $500, it's got to be in a PCGS, NGC, or ANACS holder or I refuse to even consider it.
    3) If I feel even slightly uncomfortible about anything, I dont buy.

    Bottom line, it's your money. If you dont like ANYTHING about the transaction, dont do it.

    David
  • DMWJRDMWJR Posts: 6,008 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think it is great when a coin stands on its own merits. Nowdays, it seems that it only occurs with ultra rarities. With a 1792 half disme, the ONLY thing I would be concerned with would be authenticity. If I had ANR's guarantee of authenticity, then I wouldn't hesitate to buy whichever coin I liked the best. To me, lot 36 is clearly the more desirable coin and I wouldn't have let plastic be a factor. Besides, once you get it, you can have NCS or ANACS encapsulate it for authenticity. I don't think any TPG's opinion of the grade really matters when you are talking about a coin of this caliber.

    This is really the heart of the "classics" argument over moderns, and the ultra rarities show it well. The value is not in the plastic, but in the coin. There is nothing wrong with collecting plastic (I'll be the first to admit I have some collected plastic), but you should know what you are collecting. A 1792 Half Disme is a true collector's coin, with no respect to plastic.
    Doug
  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,335 ✭✭✭✭✭
    FWIW, of these two coins I would rather own the raw one. Your opinion may vary.

    FWIW, there are many overgraded raw coins in auctions. There are also many overgraded slabbed coins in auctions. Remember that incredibly butt-ugly 1927-S $20 in the MS-67 slab that was shown on here a few weeks ago? Buy the coin, not the plastic.

    Tom D.
    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file