Home U.S. Coin Forum

A la carte cable pricing could have effect on coin market

As many of you may know there is a growing movement in Congress for cable systems to let people
choose what cable channels they want to watch instead of getting groups of channels "bundled" together
like things are done now.

If this comes to pass I would guess many people would dump the shop at home kind of channels
that include the overpriced coin offerings that many people here complain about. Since these are mostly
an impulse buy kind of thing I think many people would opt out on these channels if given a chance.

This could have an effect on the coin market especially if many people drop the channels there would
be less coin sales and less demand at the wholesale level especially for the really common everyday kinds
of coins that they sell.

Comments

  • krankykranky Posts: 8,709 ✭✭✭
    The cable companies will provide the shopping channels for free, since they get a cut of the sales.

    New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.

  • Steve27Steve27 Posts: 13,274 ✭✭✭
    "This could have an effect on the coin market especially if many people drop the channels there would
    be less coin sales and less demand at the wholesale level especially for the really common everyday kinds
    of coins that they sell."

    I hope you're kidding.


    "It's far easier to fight for principles, than to live up to them." Adlai Stevenson
  • GemineyeGemineye Posts: 5,374


    << <i>
    This could have an effect on the coin market especially if many people drop the channels there would
    be less coin sales and less demand at the wholesale level especially for the really common everyday kinds
    of coins that they sell. >>


    image
    ......Larry........image
  • The a la carte cable pricing is a bucket full of you know what.

    You will only save pennys and get a lot less channels.

    We need a better deal than this scam offers.

    ....Tony....
  • secondrepublicsecondrepublic Posts: 2,619 ✭✭✭
    You're thinking about this a little too much. This won't have any measurable effect on coins.
    "Men who had never shown any ability to make or increase fortunes for themselves abounded in brilliant plans for creating and increasing wealth for the country at large." Fiat Money Inflation in France, Andrew Dickson White (1912)
  • MichiganMichigan Posts: 4,942


    << <i>"This could have an effect on the coin market especially if many people drop the channels there would
    be less coin sales and less demand at the wholesale level especially for the really common everyday kinds
    of coins that they sell."

    I hope you're kidding. >>



    I'm not. What is the flaw in this logic? Fewer people watching the channel = fewer sales and less
    demand for coins.
  • slipgateslipgate Posts: 2,301 ✭✭
    All the crap channels would continue to be free. The cable companies know what channels people watch and that would be the channels that were in the al la carte model. My guess is after you selected the 10 or so that you watched, you'd already be at more $$ than a package offering that included everything once again.

    This is what is commonly referred to as, "feel good legislation".

    This topic deserves as much of your thought process at it takes to read this thread.
    My Registry Sets! PCGS Registry
  • OuthaulOuthaul Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I had a la carte cable where I used to live and it was great. For $12.00 per month I got basic cable with the major networks and smoe local channels. For an extra fifty-cents per channel per month I added the History Channel, A&E, and a couple of others. It was a good deal.
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I had a la carte cable where I used to live and it was great. For $12.00 per month I got basic cable with the major networks and smoe local channels. For an extra fifty-cents per channel per month I added the History Channel, A&E, and a couple of others. It was a good deal. >>



    If it becomes mandatory, you can bet that the good deals like that will vanish since the cable companies will no longer have the high profit package deals to subsidize it. Slipgate is right. This is feel good legislation.

    Russ, NCNE
  • DrWhoDrWho Posts: 562 ✭✭
    the cable company should only charge for the wire to the house, not the content/channels, except maybe the local 'free' air channels.

    the content providers, disney, espn, whatever, should pay the cable company to put their stuff on my tube. in fact, they should pay for the access to my house by giving me the wire connection for free. i pay only for the local 'free' air channels.

    THEY should be paying me to watch their junk/krap, not the other way around.

    as for the arguement, 'oh the small market content/channels will go out of business without the blanket cable charge....' well some of that junk needs to be out of business. why am i paying for dog shows? why am i paying for the golf channel, i like to play but not to pay for the channel. and then theres the all day all nite shopping/marketing. why do i pay for all day shopping? they should be paying me.
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭
    The shopping channels PAY the cable and satellite providers to carry their programming. Everyone will keep getting them.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file