Home U.S. Coin Forum

Guess this grade:

RegulatedRegulated Posts: 2,992 ✭✭✭✭✭
image

What is now proved was once only imagined. - William Blake

Comments

  • AU55?

    Dipped?
  • Gilt-Copper? Gold? From the look of the rims I want to say the coin is the one MS gilt-copper $5 known with a week strike, but since ive never seen it ? ? ? Im going to have to venture low grade MS weakly struck.
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,442 ✭✭✭✭✭
    wear on the leg feathers to a flattened degree... I'll go with XF45

    and for those too lazy to read the Red Book:

    PACIFIC COMPANY
    San Francisco, 1849

    The origin of the Pacific Co. is very uncertain. All data regarding the firm is based on conjecture.
    Edgar H. Adams wrote that he believed that the coins bearing the stamp of the Pacific Company were produced by the coining firm of Broderick and Kohler. The coins were probably handstruck, with the aid of a sledgehammer.


    ~and it's beautiful.... worth a couple hundred grand and an awesome piece of history when in the early days .... assayers were screwing miners.
    much ain't changed , 'cept the names and the processes image
  • So what grade is it?
  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭
    choice unc
  • So what grade is it?
  • 55
  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,350 ✭✭✭✭✭
    AU55

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭
    27.5 -- half of a 55. If the reverse is similar, it can add another 27.5 for a full grade of 55.

    It might be a little better than that. I suspect the flatness on the breast is due primarily to strike, not wear.
  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    I'm with Michael on this one. Appears 64 (at least this side)
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • gripgrip Posts: 9,962 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I'm with Michael on this one. Appears 64 (at least this side) >>



    I agree with the above.Unless the area of flatness is wear.Cant tell without seeing it in hand.
    Al
  • Twosides2acoin, if I can remember correctly there are only two gold $5 coins known with maybe four or so known in gilt-copper. This doesnt look to be a gold version and if it is a gilt-copper is worth much less than you would figure based on the history. For a brief period I handled a pacific $2 1/2 in silver which at the time was the finest known, could still be, and was amazed at how inexpensive it was to its gold $5 & $10 brothers.
  • BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭
    If that is wear on the back of the eagle then XF45. If it is a poor strike then MS61
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,442 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Twosides2acoin, if I can remember correctly there are only two gold $5 coins known with maybe four or so known in gilt-copper. This doesnt look to be a gold version and if it is a gilt-copper is worth much less than you would figure based on the history. For a brief period I handled a pacific $2 1/2 in silver which at the time was the finest known, could still be, and was amazed at how inexpensive it was to its gold $5 & $10 brothers. >>



    image ty ty.... I tend to forget of the off metals
  • Regulated, can you post a nice picture of the obverse. I find it to be absolutely stunning and would like to save it in my photo collection. Thanks.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file