25s for you Buff collectors
caitlin
Posts: 858 ✭✭✭
Which coin do you prefer?
A collector of high grade TONED BUFFALO NICKELS ,working on a PCGS REGISTRY SET.
0
Comments
Joe.
"The silver is mine and the gold is mine,' declares the LORD GOD Almighty."
Reverse: One on the left, hands down. Strike is miles better, no aspect of the coin on the right (how can that not be a D?) can atone for the comparative weakness in the head, fur, tail and lettering.
On the whole, the coin on the left.
morris <><
** I would take a shack on the Rock over a castle in the sand !! **
Don't take life so seriously...nobody gets out alive.
ALL VALLEY COIN AND JEWELRY
28480 B OLD TOWN FRONT ST
TEMECULA, CA 92590
(951) 757-0334
www.allvalleycoinandjewelry.com
The reverses on some 1925 coins were struck so badly that the mintmark was indistiguishable.
The 1925 obverse master hub....the die that EVERY coin comes from down the road,
was hastily and poorly made. That general weakness shows on EVERY coin minted for the entire year!
ALL obverses, even the most hammered have a strange ghostly look to them. The first two numerals of the date are always a bit weak, because that was evident on the Master Hub.
1925-D and S are at or near the top of the list for the poorest in quality in the entre series! One of the things I have run across even before this post was the knowledge that there are some specimens out there where the mintmark cannot be distinguished at all. The one here hints to that.
The reverses were a MESS. The die steel used in 1925 most likely was not properly hardened, and most new reverses wore out quickly. Denver and San Francisco just used them to their normal die life and what was left at the end sharpnees-wise was a horrible mess.
The picture of the reverse on the left is exceptional..........
The one on the right is typical.......
That's why the Buff series is so tough........finding anything decent now is just a challenge, if not an impossibilty. The decent ones are all squirrelled away.
Hope this helps.........
Pete