Is it fixable by a good dip or just screwed for good now? >>
It really depends on how long ago it was dipped. The telltale sign that it wasn't properly neutralized is the splotchy gold color that has developed on the surfaces. If it's been there long enough, it would be very difficult to correct. There's also the potential for a bad chemical reaction if a different agent is used in the process. It's sure one that I would not want to try.
Cameo proofs are not that unusual for the Barber series. The mint knew how to make great cameo proof coins in the 1800s. For the Barber halves, the early years 1892 -1899, cameo proofs are easier to find. Post 1900 Proofs are usually brilliant proofs.
That 1910 is a cameo but like you said, the toning is distracting.
Comments
Russ, NCNE
(25) 1801-1804 Bust Dollar, Large Eagle DCAM
<< <i>Bad dip on the TT coin.
Russ, NCNE >>
Is it fixable by a good dip or just screwed for good now?
<< <i><< Bad dip on the TT coin.
Russ, NCNE >>
Is it fixable by a good dip or just screwed for good now? >>
It really depends on how long ago it was dipped. The telltale sign that it wasn't properly neutralized is the splotchy gold color that has developed on the surfaces. If it's been there long enough, it would be very difficult to correct. There's also the potential for a bad chemical reaction if a different agent is used in the process. It's sure one that I would not want to try.
Russ, NCNE
That 1910 is a cameo but like you said, the toning is distracting.
FrederickCoinClub