dont worry writer one day you'll have the money and that card will be there still from keppler. every 10 cent they trot out a bunch of nice cards that are not priced to sell.
in the meantime you'll find one for $1000 and be much happier.
That is an absolutely horrible Andre Dawson RC. Absolutely insulting that a card of that magnitude that is THAT poorly registered and poorly focused combined with the below average color-strike would garner that grade. This is exactly why I retired my set, but continue to collect it. PSA just does a very poor job with this particular issue. They may do a poor job elsewhere, but I am only able to speak to 1977. That card is a piece of garbage that belongs in a 9 (OF) or NM 7 holder. Absurd grade.
<< <i>That is an absolutely horrible Andre Dawson RC. Absolutely insulting that a card of that magnitude that is THAT poorly registered and poorly focused combined with the below average color-strike would garner that grade. This is exactly why I retired my set, but continue to collect it. PSA just does a very poor job with this particular issue. They may do a poor job elsewhere, but I am only able to speak to 1977. That card is a piece of garbage that belongs in a 9 (OF) or NM 7 holder. Absurd grade.
dgf >>
dg
I think the flip was mislabeled - it's supposed to the read:
<< <i>That is an absolutely horrible Andre Dawson RC. Absolutely insulting that a card of that magnitude that is THAT poorly registered and poorly focused combined with the below average color-strike would garner that grade. This is exactly why I retired my set, but continue to collect it. PSA just does a very poor job with this particular issue. They may do a poor job elsewhere, but I am only able to speak to 1977. That card is a piece of garbage that belongs in a 9 (OF) or NM 7 holder. Absurd grade.
dgf >>
Phil - surely you know that the numerical system PSA uses is primarily based upon the corners and centering. Do you think the grader even knows who Andre Dawson is, or cares if the color is off?
I am actively buying MIKE SCHMIDT gem mint baseball cards. Also looking for any 19th century cabinets of Philadephia Nationals. Please PM with additional details.
Comments
IMO the registry is horrible.
My Auctions
in the meantime you'll find one for $1000 and be much happier.
dgf
<< <i>That is an absolutely horrible Andre Dawson RC. Absolutely insulting that a card of that magnitude that is THAT poorly registered and poorly focused combined with the below average color-strike would garner that grade. This is exactly why I retired my set, but continue to collect it. PSA just does a very poor job with this particular issue. They may do a poor job elsewhere, but I am only able to speak to 1977. That card is a piece of garbage that belongs in a 9 (OF) or NM 7 holder. Absurd grade.
dgf >>
dg
I think the flip was mislabeled - it's supposed to the read:
1977 Topps
3-D Rookie Outfielders
<< <i>That is an absolutely horrible Andre Dawson RC. Absolutely insulting that a card of that magnitude that is THAT poorly registered and poorly focused combined with the below average color-strike would garner that grade. This is exactly why I retired my set, but continue to collect it. PSA just does a very poor job with this particular issue. They may do a poor job elsewhere, but I am only able to speak to 1977. That card is a piece of garbage that belongs in a 9 (OF) or NM 7 holder. Absurd grade.
dgf >>
Phil - surely you know that the numerical system PSA uses is primarily based upon the corners and centering. Do you think the grader even knows who Andre Dawson is, or cares if the color is off?